|
|
Post by Totheleft on Nov 22, 2024 11:40:00 GMT
ok your saying if immigrants go to war with a population and they win the war the population has no right to be there few its lucky are immigrants are so peaceful I'm not talking about right or wrong, I'm talking about the consequences of defeat. Clearly, if the uk public stand by while their government arranges handing their territory to their foreign friends, the uk public will end up will no right to be there. If the UK public loses some kind of internal war against these invaders, then we can perhaps expect the kind of treatment that is handed out to losers in Africa etc - ie literal slavery / death camps. wow really slavery and death camps SCARY |
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Nov 22, 2024 11:42:10 GMT
Once again, ten thousand? Is that all?
There's nearly a million illegal immigrants in the UK.
|
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Nov 22, 2024 12:19:04 GMT
An invasion is people making entry without proper authority or invitation to do so. A group walking through your back door and into your house are invaders. so legal immigrants arnt invaders thank you That is moot as indicated by Orac above. The proper authority in a democratic society is the electorate and they have demonstrated time and again what authority they are granting when they were asked. |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Nov 22, 2024 12:27:24 GMT
so legal immigrants arnt invaders thank you That is moot as indicated by Orac above. The proper authority in a democratic society is the electorate and they have demonstrated time and again what authority they are granting when they were asked. ok people say the labour party are synonymous with immigration and it seem the cons have gone that way and reform want less immigration yet only picked up a minority of votes in comparison to the other 2.and dose mean the voting public want immigration |
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Nov 22, 2024 12:28:57 GMT
so legal immigrants arnt invaders thank you That is moot as indicated by Orac above. The proper authority in a democratic society is the electorate and they have demonstrated time and again what authority they are granting when they were asked. wens peoples r waycis nd shud b Igknawed. imygrunts iz Moor speshal dan u nd guvornmant shud ignur peeples voats. man dates No. |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Nov 22, 2024 12:32:03 GMT
Once again, ten thousand? Is that all? There's nearly a million illegal immigrants in the UK. I'd say that was a massive under-estimate. They have been flowing in un-interrupted for years |
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Nov 22, 2024 14:29:17 GMT
That is moot as indicated by Orac above. The proper authority in a democratic society is the electorate and they have demonstrated time and again what authority they are granting when they were asked. wens peoples r waycis nd shud b Igknawed. imygrunts iz Moor speshal dan u nd guvornmant shud ignur peeples voats. man dates No.  |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Nov 22, 2024 14:53:18 GMT
Nope, you missed out the huge increase in migration that is down to asylum seekers which is much later than the 1960s. Yes - the era of mass immigration started in sixties (arguably the fifties) and you accept that legal solution are not only possible but likely. I don't think you have a point to make here.
I'm unsure why you responded to me. You agree with me. I might agree with you if you can quote a period of mass migration into the UK in the earlier post 1960s era, that is equal to the influx of asylum seekers since the mid 2,000s. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Nov 22, 2024 14:56:19 GMT
so legal immigrants arnt invaders thank you That is moot as indicated by Orac above. The proper authority in a democratic society is the electorate and they have demonstrated time and again what authority they are granting when they were asked. So we don't need rules, regulations or laws. Hmm, interesting. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Nov 22, 2024 14:58:03 GMT
That is moot as indicated by Orac above. The proper authority in a democratic society is the electorate and they have demonstrated time and again what authority they are granting when they were asked. So we don't need rules, regulations or laws. Hmm, interesting. No, we need rules, regulations and laws that reflect the wishes of the electorate. Not ones which go against them. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Nov 22, 2024 14:58:20 GMT
Once again, ten thousand? Is that all? There's nearly a million illegal immigrants in the UK. Credit where it is due, and criticism where that is due. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Nov 22, 2024 14:59:49 GMT
So we don't need rules, regulations or laws. Hmm, interesting. No, we need rules, regulations and laws that reflect the wishes of the electorate. Not ones which go against them. That's what we have got. All within the law of course. |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Nov 22, 2024 16:58:35 GMT
Yes - the era of mass immigration started in sixties (arguably the fifties) and you accept that legal solution are not only possible but likely. I don't think you have a point to make here.
I'm unsure why you responded to me. You agree with me. I might agree with you if you can quote a period of mass migration into the UK in the earlier post 1960s era, that is equal to the influx of asylum seekers since the mid 2,000s. As far as I know, no point i made rested on that - so this is junk |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Nov 22, 2024 19:39:47 GMT
Good for you,but I would and it’s not my idea of fun it’s a slur to defeat an argument instead of debate. They come as a pair. If you get into an exchange with Zanygame expect things to vanish.
Of lovely Coco. A chance for you to attack Zany again. What you live for. So cute. |
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Nov 22, 2024 19:49:20 GMT
What attack would that be, little one?
|
|
