|
Post by Totheleft on Nov 20, 2024 9:45:29 GMT
so half of the muslim population blow up and stab children Not what i said - read again in one breath your saying over half the muslim population are hostile towards us then you say a large population of muslims are hostile with browing and stabbing children think its not hard to draw the conclusion 2+2 =4
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Nov 20, 2024 9:50:58 GMT
Not what i said - read again in one breath your saying over half the muslim population are hostile towards us then you say a large population of muslims are hostile with browing and stabbing children think its not hard to draw the conclusion 2+2 =4 Making things up……again
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Nov 20, 2024 9:59:12 GMT
Not what i said - read again in one breath your saying over half the muslim population are hostile towards us then you say a large population of muslims are hostile with browing and stabbing children No. I said blowing up and stabbing children is froth on the surface
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Nov 20, 2024 10:09:53 GMT
in one breath your saying over half the muslim population are hostile towards us then you say a large population of muslims are hostile with browing and stabbing children No. I said blowing up and stabbing children is froth on the surface you mean like the tip of the ice burg
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Nov 20, 2024 10:43:20 GMT
so half of the muslim population blow up and stab children thought it was against forum rules to stereotype According to polls in the past a very large percentage of the Muslim population want what the Islamists want - Sharia and blasphemy laws. The terrorism, murders and rape of English children is there to stir up a reaction which the state uses to appease the Islamists. Persecution is worse than death. The process goes all the way back to Medina and some may refer to it as Jihad. I know you support it, because you support it toward Israel and the UK. Well at least prosecution isn't a problem. "The Muslim prison population is now 13,200. It means Muslims are 15 percent of all prisoners but five percent of the British population." So we know that Muslims will be prosecuted if they break the Law.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 20, 2024 10:50:14 GMT
According to polls in the past a very large percentage of the Muslim population want what the Islamists want - Sharia and blasphemy laws. The terrorism, murders and rape of English children is there to stir up a reaction which the state uses to appease the Islamists. Persecution is worse than death. The process goes all the way back to Medina and some may refer to it as Jihad. I know you support it, because you support it toward Israel and the UK. Well at least prosecution isn't a problem. "The Muslim prison population is now 13,200. It means Muslims are 15 percent of all prisoners but five percent of the British population." So we know that Muslims will be prosecuted if they break the Law. Not necessarily. They could be committing far more crimes and a fewer percentage prosecuted.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Nov 20, 2024 10:53:42 GMT
Understand contract and the breaking of one very clearly. The students use to just do there studies then some return home It was the conservatives who brought in the contract has you call it to be Allowed to stay a further 2yrs working in there chosen fields. It seems to me these people was a assets to the country why not has i said make them more secured Because their doing that destroys the ability of our own to get those same qualifications and do those jobs That ability depends upon the education system which has too often been designed to produce academic elitists as if academic elitism was a cure for all the countries ills.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Nov 20, 2024 10:59:53 GMT
in one breath your saying over half the muslim population are hostile towards us then you say a large population of muslims are hostile with browing and stabbing children No. I said blowing up and stabbing children is froth on the surface Some Muslims fit into British society without a problem others clearly don't. The problem is that --"There have been Muslims in Britain since the 16th century, with communities developing from the late-1900s in the port cities of London, Cardiff, Glasgow, Liverpool, Tyneside, and Hull."-- That is the reality we have to live with. Do you have an answer to it?
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 20, 2024 11:03:40 GMT
No. I said blowing up and stabbing children is froth on the surface Some Muslims fit into British society without a problem others clearly don't. The problem is that --"There have been Muslims in Britain since the 16th century, with communities developing from the late-1900s in the port cities of London, Cardiff, Glasgow, Liverpool, Tyneside, and Hull."-- That is the reality we have to live with. Do you have an answer to it? 16th century society was far different from today and Muslims obviously were not as numerous or had the kind of Government support that they enjoy today . In other words it’s completely irrelevant.
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Nov 20, 2024 11:05:45 GMT
No. I said blowing up and stabbing children is froth on the surface you mean like the tip of the ice burg Not quite It's like the chaotic surface on a deep body of water.
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Nov 21, 2024 9:00:47 GMT
Not what i said - read again in one breath your saying over half the muslim population are hostile towards us then you say a large population of muslims are hostile with browing and stabbing children think its not hard to draw the conclusion 2+2 =4 No Orac never crosses that line, he implies like hell but never says. That's why he's not a racist. 😅 😂 🤣
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Nov 21, 2024 11:16:22 GMT
No. I said blowing up and stabbing children is froth on the surface Some Muslims fit into British society without a problem others clearly don't. The problem is that --"There have been Muslims in Britain since the 16th century, with communities developing from the late-1900s in the port cities of London, Cardiff, Glasgow, Liverpool, Tyneside, and Hull."-- That is the reality we have to live with. Do you have an answer to it? This is the same sort of revisionism that has thousands of Africans living in London in the middle ages. It's bunk - in this case, misdirection by vague statements. To give you an idea just off center most of these claims are, a systematic survey and estimate was made in about 1900 - the number of blacks living in London was estimated to be no more than 100. I guess you could technically also call that a 'community' if you really tried. The amount of horse-shit you have to wade through to talk about what has been clearly done to the country since the sixties, is just staggering
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Nov 21, 2024 13:42:52 GMT
Some Muslims fit into British society without a problem others clearly don't. The problem is that --"There have been Muslims in Britain since the 16th century, with communities developing from the late-1900s in the port cities of London, Cardiff, Glasgow, Liverpool, Tyneside, and Hull."-- That is the reality we have to live with. Do you have an answer to it? This is the same sort of revisionism that has thousands of Africans living in London in the middle ages. It's bunk - in this case, misdirection by vague statements. To give you an idea just off center most of these claims are, a systematic survey and estimate was made in about 1900 - the number of blacks living in London was estimated to be no more than 100. I guess you could technically also call that a 'community' if you really tried. The amount of horse-shit you have to wade through to talk about what has been clearly done to the country since the sixties, is just staggering Miranda Kaufman has done some research of this and can only find some 350 black people living in England in Tudor times. Most of those would either not have had any issue or intermarried with locals and the following generations assimilated.
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Nov 21, 2024 16:48:57 GMT
Some Muslims fit into British society without a problem others clearly don't. The problem is that --"There have been Muslims in Britain since the 16th century, with communities developing from the late-1900s in the port cities of London, Cardiff, Glasgow, Liverpool, Tyneside, and Hull."-- That is the reality we have to live with. Do you have an answer to it? This is the same sort of revisionism that has thousands of Africans living in London in the middle ages. It's bunk - in this case, misdirection by vague statements. To give you an idea just off center most of these claims are, a systematic survey and estimate was made in about 1900 - the number of blacks living in London was estimated to be no more than 100. I guess you could technically also call that a 'community' if you really tried. The amount of horse-shit you have to wade through to talk about what has been clearly done to the country since the sixties, is just staggering Muslims in Liverpool before the 1950s > "The Liverpool Muslim Society, founded in 1953 by the late Al-Haj Ali Hizzam, a member of Liverpool's Muslim Community, and originally operated from a room in his house, is based at the mosque. The current mosque was built in 1974, having taken 10 years to get approval from the city's planning department. See more Whatever the case, asylum seekers are here, do you have a legal, workable answer to the Problem? If you don't I suggest you start to understand that whinging has never sorted anything out.
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Nov 21, 2024 17:29:28 GMT
This is the same sort of revisionism that has thousands of Africans living in London in the middle ages. It's bunk - in this case, misdirection by vague statements. To give you an idea just off center most of these claims are, a systematic survey and estimate was made in about 1900 - the number of blacks living in London was estimated to be no more than 100. I guess you could technically also call that a 'community' if you really tried. The amount of horse-shit you have to wade through to talk about what has been clearly done to the country since the sixties, is just staggering Whatever the case, asylum seekers are here, do you have a legal, workable answer to the Problem? My point is of course that the numbers were very small, while yours appears to be "they weren't zero, so there - you have to accept being invaded" - ie we are talking a t crossed purposes. This is pretty standard fair for those trying to normalise btw. One of roles of government is to change the law. The legal way to prevent it currently is to make the option of arriving illegally unattractive.
|
|