Man charged with blowing up ULEZ camera...

Love this, Moby is pretty good too...

It seems strange that counter terror police were involved when the cause explicitly is not to cause terror but to destroy the camera. It appears as though for Islamic terrorism or ethnic minority terrorism they move heaven and earth to avoid terror charges or involving counter terrorism police. For everyone else they come out at the drop of a hat including heckling Tony Blair at a Labour party conference.

Full marks to that man for trying though. When you tot up driving fines, vat, parking, income tax, and all the other charges that span existence, there is a case for government wanting to destroy Britain.

He has not been charged with Terrorism , because there is no evidence to prove it was an act of Terrorism, he was charged under the appropriate Explosives Act as he is alleged to have made explosives to destroy a ULEZ Camera

In order to prove an Offence under the Terrorism Act 

The following elements of the definition of terrorism need to be proved:


there has been an actual or contemplated use or threat of action involving serious violence against a person, endangering a person’s life or creating a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or a section of the public;


the use or threat of action also involved the use of firearms or explosives; or


if the use or threat of action did not involve the use of firearms or explosives then it is necessary to consider whether the use or threat of action was designed to influence the government or an international governmental organisation or to intimidate the public or a section of the public); and that

the use or threat of action is made for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause.


The actions of individuals who travel from the UK overseas to participate in fighting, may be caught by the provisions of section 1 of the Terrorism Act 2000.

The man charged with the dreadful Murders in Southport and the Attempted Murders also had one charge under the Terrorism Act which was Possession and a Terrorist Manual which in itself is not an Act of Terror  

The police now are an arm of the goveernment, a disturbing development. You would think an englishman would resist such, that the top policeman would refuse to tell lies. Not the case. My own perception of being english is that the english are not corruptable, now not the case.

Livelihoods are at stake, defy that phone call and your career is on skid row.

I have tried to explain what is classed in Law as an Act of Terrorism and what is not as laid down by Law, as I stated earlier the ULEZ Camera was destroyed by an Explosion hence the Terrorist Police were called in to investigate it, as they have Explosive Experts attached to them, you would not expect a Traffic Cop to investigate it

To prove what was used to cause an explosion which was strong enough to blow the camera to bits and damage vehicles near to it, having secured that evidence and arrested the suspect and interviewed him as to why he did what he did he has now been charged they considered what he is alleged to have done did not constitute an act of Terrorism but was a Criminal Offence under the Explosive Act. IMHO that says to me his intention was to blow up the camera not people  

The suspect charged with the Murders in Southport and Attempted Murder of others children, was charged with one Offence of possession of a Terrorist Manual  under the Terrorism Act, simply possession one is covered by that Act, but not an act of Terrorism in itself. He was charged with making Ricin , I don't think they found any but he obviously had made some, is that an act of Terrorism ? it appear not as they charged him under another serious Act of making it 

Tommy Robinson was stopped by Anti Terrorist Police and refused to give them his PIN number to his mobile phone bailed and later charged with refusing to give them his PIN an offence yes but not an act of Terrorism, but IMO the media made a big deal about it, he was charged with Terrorism LOB , the Offence he was charged with is usually dealt with at a Magistrates Court, and Magistrates don't deal with Terrorism   

I don't get this two tier Police at all there isn't , the Police do not decide what Charges are brought against anyone from low level Offences to Murder or Terrorism the CPS do and have done since 1980