|
|
Post by wapentake on Nov 5, 2024 11:29:52 GMT
Bunch of right wingers spend time moaning about something that doesn't affect them one iota (except at weekends). If that's what you think is wrong with the world, it can't be that bad a place. But it does affect them and I’m not right wing btw and despite my age still do some work. Recently there was an email reminding people of the he she him blah blah. In my working and everyday life I've been called mate,squire,chief,pal,twatty bollocks and much more lol.Women are often referred to as love,flower,petal is any of this remotely offensive and you think there’s something wrong with us? |
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Nov 5, 2024 11:40:11 GMT
Bunch of right wingers spend time moaning about something that doesn't affect them one iota (except at weekends). If that's what you think is wrong with the world, it can't be that bad a place. It affects everyone if people get turned down for jobs because of diversity quotas. Let's say that someone gets turned down for a Doctor's job despite having spent years at University and being as qualified and professional as he can be, but being white male and straight gets turned down. That's the danger with this diversity agenda. The most qualified people for the job should always get it, but the moronic push for diversity insists on discrimination against the majority. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 5, 2024 11:49:56 GMT
Bunch of right wingers spend time moaning about something that doesn't affect them one iota (except at weekends). If that's what you think is wrong with the world, it can't be that bad a place. The same could be aimed at you lefties who seem to be obsessed with forcing us to accept Dave the scaffolder should have the right to put on a frock and identity as a woman . When others refuse to accept leftie ideology , lefties tell us that those others are obsessed by it . |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Nov 5, 2024 11:56:54 GMT
Bunch of right wingers spend time moaning about something that doesn't affect them one iota (except at weekends). If that's what you think is wrong with the world, it can't be that bad a place.  |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Nov 5, 2024 12:01:13 GMT
Bunch of right wingers spend time moaning about something that doesn't affect them one iota (except at weekends). If that's what you think is wrong with the world, it can't be that bad a place. Indeed. It hasn’t passed unnoticed by women that trans rights can be just another way men can oppress women . I doubt that feminists foresaw men pretending to be women and taking over sports and women’s spaces when they claimed gender was a social construct. |
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Nov 5, 2024 12:04:00 GMT
Russia's Putin is against it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Nov 5, 2024 12:30:29 GMT
Orwell said it first, but Foucault said it better: 'who controls the language controls the discourse, and he who controls the discourse has the power' (paraphased)
On hearing this all proggies and other lefties spring to their feet, snap to attention and salute the closest virtual flagpole.
|
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Nov 5, 2024 21:15:52 GMT
And to prove the loonies have taken over the asylum a council worker has lost an unfair dismissal claim because putting adult human male on his emails instead of he/him was causing offence. link |
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Nov 6, 2024 8:53:03 GMT
Sir Keir Starmer's government has begun using LGBT+ instead of LGBT across all departments. Ministers are said to have approved the change in acronym following the general election. In response to a written answer, Lord Collins of Highbury said "yes" when asked whether the decision had come from ministers. He added... ..."The Government uses the term LGBT+ to reflect the breadth and diversity of the community as well as the preferences of most LGBT+ people. This term also resonates with language used by international partners and institutions. www.express.co.uk/news/politics/1971334/sir-keir-starmers-government-adoptsHave you ever heard a bigger load of left wing woke bullshit in your life? If that's not an advert for Reform UK, I'd like to know what is... Yes I have Good god how are you expected to remember all that? Best stick to Oi you lol They / Them / Their ... God that brings up a memory Decades ago the BBC ran a version of Frankenstein with James Mason in the role of the creator of the first reanimated woman... Talking with 'The Creature' Masons character asks 'what is your name' The Creature replies from a piece of Scripture he has found 'my name is legion, for we are many' Mason's character says 'yes, there must be three of you in there at least' |
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Nov 7, 2024 8:52:04 GMT
Bunch of right wingers spend time moaning about something that doesn't affect them one iota (except at weekends). If that's what you think is wrong with the world, it can't be that bad a place. The same could be aimed at you lefties who seem to be obsessed with forcing us to accept Dave the scaffolder should have the right to put on a frock and identity as a woman . When others refuse to accept leftie ideology , lefties tell us that those others are obsessed by it . The thing is, and I've said it before on here, I don't actually CARE if Dave the Scaffolder wears a dress and a wig and demands they be addressed as Davina as long as the five inch heels they wear on the site have safety shoe certification... Our HR team have sadly recently appointed a diversity and inclusivity champion. We were recently asked to complete a form advising how we wished to be addressed. I emailed back 'Probably the only employee who knows how to make a nuclear bomb, and who also knows how to dispose of a body leaving no forensic evidence' I copied in our IT director, who already knows it's true.... So far, they have agreed to just call me John..... |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Nov 7, 2024 9:02:38 GMT
It affects everyone if people get turned down for jobs because of diversity quotas. This isn't a change in the law. |
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Nov 7, 2024 10:32:01 GMT
It affects everyone if people get turned down for jobs because of diversity quotas. This isn't a change in the law. Yet. |
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Nov 7, 2024 23:01:32 GMT
It affects everyone if people get turned down for jobs because of diversity quotas. This isn't a change in the law. Yet Harriet Harman dictated while a minister that the black, the brown, the gay, and the women who apply for a job be considered ahead of any white married heterosexual men because there were not enough people paid to d sign nuclear bombs who showed instability in the sex God or Darwin had deemed they be born as And the only exception to that was the union post her husband held And the only reason this isn't law is Cameron got the seat we threw Gordon Brown out of back in 2010 |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Nov 7, 2024 23:55:06 GMT
This isn't a change in the law. Yet Harriet Harman dictated while a minister that the black, the brown, the gay, and the women who apply for a job be considered ahead of any white married heterosexual men because there were not enough people paid to d sign nuclear bombs who showed instability in the sex God or Darwin had deemed they be born as And the only exception to that was the union post her husband held And the only reason this isn't law is Cameron got the seat we threw Gordon Brown out of back in 2010 Well it may not be legally acceptable to discriminate on the basis of skin colour, but it rather depends who's been discriminated against. In reality discrimination is perfectly acceptable it happens all the time, it's called diversity. As I'm sure you all know my son applied to join the police and was told that all places for white entrants had been taken, he was invited to reapply in two years time. He didn't even get an interview because he had white skin. Can you imagine for a moment the reaction if a young black man was told... sorry son, all places for black entrants have been taken. Try again in a couple of years! Yes indeed, the outrage would be heard across the world, the BBC would see to that. The inquiry would cost tens of millions, and the poor young black man who was so horribly discriminated against would be awarded eye watering compensation a knighthood and a day would be named after him. And every year the BBC would remind the nasty white racist majority that they have to thrash themselves and beg forgiveness. Martin Luther King said people should be judged by the content of their character, not the colour of their skin. Wise words. Sadly, woke lefties today would consider the greatest civil rights leader of the 20th century, to be a racist. |
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Nov 8, 2024 10:27:34 GMT
I think I shall ignore it with gay abandon. Gay used to mean a women of loose morals. You know the type. |
|
