|
|
Post by Rebirth on Oct 26, 2024 12:47:36 GMT
100% British Patriots! Are taking to the streets......RIP Peter Lynch. Our fucking excuse for a government should be fucking ASHAMED of their treatment of a 61 year old father of four with three grandchildren! DISGUSTING! I would say the British regime support Islamists. This was made obvious when the police were ordered to stand down at the Hamas marches to the point the British people thought the police were weak. The moment a few pale faces showed up the police turned into something you'd expect to see in Moscow. |
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Oct 26, 2024 12:50:15 GMT
I have a good enough idea. The state disagrees with his politics. You may guess right or you may guess wrongly, IMO it appears to me they have a reason for wanting to see what is on his Phone and who or what organisations he is contact with . Here is what he has been charged with He is accused of being in contempt of court following the airing of a film at a protest in central London and after attending Folkestone Police station on Friday, he was separately charged with failing to provide his mobile phone Pin to police under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000, IMO not charged with an Act of Terrorism, but failing to comply with legislation which is part of the Terrorism Act It's a load of fucking bullshit. A real terrorist would be like the Baader-Meinhof Gang or the IRA, not a man who hangs around London giving out leaflets or whatever he does at these gigs. It's just a waste of our taxes. The judges and lawyers are making a killing out of all this self-developed bullshit. |
|
|
|
Post by patman post on Oct 26, 2024 12:54:50 GMT
100% British Patriots! Are taking to the streets......RIP Peter Lynch. Our fucking excuse for a government should be fucking ASHAMED of their treatment of a 61 year old father of four with three grandchildren! DISGUSTING! The government is the executive branch of the three branches* of the state. The courts/judiciary is another branch which, in the case of Peter Lynch, judged him and applied the law. He was sentenced to two years and eight months after he pleaded guilty to being part of the unrest at the Holiday Inn Express in Rotherham on 4 August.**
Lynch had suffered a heart attack earlier in the year and had also been diagnosed with diabetes. He had gone to the hotel to protest against immigration. Part of his defence was that he had a general conspiracy theory against anyone and any form of authority, and had taken a placard referencing Deep State and space agency Nasa. In other words, Lynch was a possible dangerous nutter, who should have had greater regard for his own health and stayed away.
Seems to me that it's always a good idea to stay away from potentially violent demos, whether pro or anti any cause.
Sadly, in the case of Peter Lynch, he didn't even live long enough to serve the 40% of his time...
*Parliament is the third branch of the state.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Oct 26, 2024 12:59:17 GMT
You may guess right or you may guess wrongly, IMO it appears to me they have a reason for wanting to see what is on his Phone and who or what organisations he is contact with . Here is what he has been charged with He is accused of being in contempt of court following the airing of a film at a protest in central London and after attending Folkestone Police station on Friday, he was separately charged with failing to provide his mobile phone Pin to police under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000, IMO not charged with an Act of Terrorism, but failing to comply with legislation which is part of the Terrorism Act It's a load of fucking bullshit. A real terrorist would be like the Baader-Meinhof Gang or the IRA, not a man who hangs around London giving out leaflets or whatever he does at these gigs. It's just a waste of our taxes. The judges and lawyers are making a killing out of all this self-developed bullshit. Apparently misinformation is one sided, it's only the Right wing who spread misinformation, everyone who is at that Tommy Robinson march has been accused of being 'Far Right', now if we had as good 'Rightist' lawyers like they have lefty lawyers, people should challenge the government and demand to prove they are Far Right, and if they can't prove these people wrongly labeled Far Right then take them to Court for Misinformation, that's what many were locked up for during the Riots.
It works both ways, we just haven't got lawyers of the same caliber as the lefty lawyers, if we did they would be representing people locked up in prison for spreading misinformation, because every media outlet that accuses protesters in the Tommy Robinson march as 'Far Right' needs to be taken to court ... put up or shut the fuck up.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Oct 26, 2024 13:00:10 GMT
100% British Patriots! Are taking to the streets......RIP Peter Lynch. Our fucking excuse for a government should be fucking ASHAMED of their treatment of a 61 year old father of four with three grandchildren! DISGUSTING! The government is the executive branch of the three branches* of the state. The courts/judiciary is another branch which, in the case of Peter Lynch, judged him and applied the law. He was sentenced to two years and eight months after he pleaded guilty to being part of the unrest at the Holiday Inn Express in Rotherham on 4 August.**
Lynch had suffered a heart attack earlier in the year and had also been diagnosed with diabetes. He had gone to the hotel to protest against immigration. Part of his defence was that he had a general conspiracy theory against anyone and any form of authority, and had taken a placard referencing Deep State and space agency Nasa. In other words, Lynch was a possible dangerous nutter, who should have had greater regard for his own health and stayed away.
Seems to me that it's always a good idea to stay away from potentially violent demos, whether pro or anti any cause.
Sadly, in the case of Peter Lynch, he didn't even live long enough to serve the 40% of his time...
*Parliament is the third branch of the state.
And what bunch of cunts have changed the laws in less than a hundred days? |
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Oct 26, 2024 13:01:27 GMT
Imagine quoting the BBC to attack Robinson. The BBC is a mouthpiece for the far-left who intentionally fail to mention Hamas as the proscribed terrorist organisation that it is, whilst supporting anti-terror laws being used on British people who only advocate protest.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Oct 26, 2024 13:06:12 GMT
The government is the executive branch of the three branches* of the state. The courts/judiciary is another branch which, in the case of Peter Lynch, judged him and applied the law. He was sentenced to two years and eight months after he pleaded guilty to being part of the unrest at the Holiday Inn Express in Rotherham on 4 August.**
Lynch had suffered a heart attack earlier in the year and had also been diagnosed with diabetes. He had gone to the hotel to protest against immigration. Part of his defence was that he had a general conspiracy theory against anyone and any form of authority, and had taken a placard referencing Deep State and space agency Nasa. In other words, Lynch was a possible dangerous nutter, who should have had greater regard for his own health and stayed away.
Seems to me that it's always a good idea to stay away from potentially violent demos, whether pro or anti any cause.
Sadly, in the case of Peter Lynch, he didn't even live long enough to serve the 40% of his time...
*Parliament is the third branch of the state.
And what bunch of cunts have changed the laws in less than a hundred days? Look at how the Labour party politicians in London tried to stir up racial hatred after some lowlife drug pushing gun-toting criminal was shot. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Oct 26, 2024 13:07:48 GMT
No mention the anti-Tommy Robinson marchers branded Far Left, and even if they did idiots would say nothing wrong with being Far Left. It's the typical double standard hypocrisy that the left have a exclusive club.
|
|
|
|
Post by patman post on Oct 26, 2024 13:11:37 GMT
My point is if we are going to get away from the Westminster bubble and two party tosspots is through someone like Farage or reform itself whether that be the actual party or real reforms.
What does Robinson bring to the table? Fooling people in to giving him cash under false pretences doesn’t that ring any bells like the expenses scandal?
I know you’re not really interested but imo he’s a dishonest carpetbagger and his posturing almost ruined a grooming gang case whilst he pursued his own glorification.
Whilst the country is in a state we do have some worthwhile values and way of life which can still be saved, he represents none of them and only puts on an act to pursue his own self enrichment.
Ive seen some representations of the people who gave their all in two world wars the very best of this country looking at today and saying why did we bother,I have no doubt if they viewed Robinson they’d say what a ****. You are comparing politicians with Robinson, why? It seems to me you have a hatred for him simply because he is Tommy Robinson, as I said previously, you know nothing about him, and for the record... I know a few old soldiers and I promise you they are far more sympathetic to Tommy Robinson than Keir Starmer. Not surprising — it's well documented that regimented mainly-male state organisations — such as the military, police and prison officers — attract to their ranks a greater number of violent misogynists, populists and racists than might be encountered in the wider population.
The Army, the Met, and Wandsworth prison officers are currently in the frame for such behaviour...
|
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Oct 26, 2024 13:13:52 GMT
No mention the anti-Tommy Robinson marchers branded Far Left, and even if they did idiots would say nothing wrong with being Far Left. It's the typical double standard hypocrisy that the left have a exclusive club. Of course not, they're establishment drones marching for the Orwellian state paid for by corrupt Labour party Unions. It's why Labour is utterly dependent on importing the third world.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Oct 26, 2024 13:15:01 GMT
violent misogynists, populists and racists BLM |
|
|
|
Post by patman post on Oct 26, 2024 13:16:51 GMT
The government is the executive branch of the three branches* of the state. The courts/judiciary is another branch which, in the case of Peter Lynch, judged him and applied the law. He was sentenced to two years and eight months after he pleaded guilty to being part of the unrest at the Holiday Inn Express in Rotherham on 4 August.**
Lynch had suffered a heart attack earlier in the year and had also been diagnosed with diabetes. He had gone to the hotel to protest against immigration. Part of his defence was that he had a general conspiracy theory against anyone and any form of authority, and had taken a placard referencing Deep State and space agency Nasa. In other words, Lynch was a possible dangerous nutter, who should have had greater regard for his own health and stayed away.
Seems to me that it's always a good idea to stay away from potentially violent demos, whether pro or anti any cause.
Sadly, in the case of Peter Lynch, he didn't even live long enough to serve the 40% of his time...
*Parliament is the third branch of the state.
And what bunch of cunts have changed the laws in less than a hundred days? Certainly none of those violently demonstrating have achieved anything positive — it was left to the law-abiding members of various communities to clear up the mess... |
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Oct 26, 2024 13:17:40 GMT
It's a load of fucking bullshit. A real terrorist would be like the Baader-Meinhof Gang or the IRA, not a man who hangs around London giving out leaflets or whatever he does at these gigs. It's just a waste of our taxes. The judges and lawyers are making a killing out of all this self-developed bullshit. Apparently misinformation is one sided, it's only the Right wing who spread misinformation, everyone who is at that Tommy Robinson march has been accused of being 'Far Right', now if we had as good 'Rightist' lawyers like they have lefty lawyers, people should challenge the government and demand to prove they are Far Right, and if they can't prove these people wrongly labeled Far Right then take them to Court for Misinformation, that's what many were locked up for during the Riots.
It works both ways, we just haven't got lawyers of the same caliber as the lefty lawyers, if we did they would be representing people locked up in prison for spreading misinformation, because every media outlet that accuses protesters in the Tommy Robinson march as 'Far Right' needs to be taken to court ... put up or shut the fuck up.
It's why I learnt law. There is a piece of tax case law with my name on it. I won the appeal agaisnt a bent judge, so now the bent judge and her fuckwit mistake is enshrined in law. Any lawyer doing tax who comes across the same fuckwit of a problem can quote my case and win as well.
Anyway, here are some of his rights.
State interference with any of these rights is strictly forbidden.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Oct 26, 2024 13:19:47 GMT
And what bunch of cunts have changed the laws in less than a hundred days? Certainly none of those violently demonstrating have achieved anything positive — it was left to the law-abiding members of various communities to clear up the mess... When has shouting a few words been dangerous or violent. Why is it we have to protest in our own country for our own rights? |
|
|
|
Post by patman post on Oct 26, 2024 13:28:54 GMT
Certainly none of those violently demonstrating have achieved anything positive — it was left to the law-abiding members of various communities to clear up the mess... When has shouting a few words been dangerous or violent. Why is it we have to protest in our own country for our own rights? Amazing how forceful some words can be when they cause the damage, destruction and injuries witnessed in the summer riots.
What rights are you having to protest for...?
|
|
