|
Post by Handyman on Oct 29, 2024 21:12:48 GMT
Oh I see I was until this point tempted to take the allegations against Robinson seriously If in doubt and need some back up mention Russian connections. Until they check and find out they will not know if he has Russian connections or not
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Oct 29, 2024 21:22:04 GMT
If in doubt and need some back up mention Russian connections. Until they check and find out they will not know if he has Russian connections or not LOL
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Oct 29, 2024 21:32:11 GMT
Until they check and find out they will not know if he has Russian connections or not LOL You never know he might have bought a case of Vodka from Putin
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Oct 30, 2024 7:52:35 GMT
So to recap, man in possession of an Al-Qaeda training manual, stabs three random strangers: Not a terrorist offence.
Man who refuses to hand over PIN, terrorist.
We are really are living in clown world.
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Oct 30, 2024 13:45:50 GMT
So to recap, man in possession of an Al-Qaeda training manual, stabs three random strangers: Not a terrorist offence. Man who refuses to hand over PIN, terrorist. We are really are living in clown world. The Young Man who is suspected of Murdering the young girls and attempted has been charged, when the Police found the terrorist manual and evidence of manufacturing Ricin he was further charged under the Terrorism Act Robinson was stopped by Police entering the UK 28th July 2024 and for reasons we do not know took his phone and requested his PIN number which they have the power to ask for he refused Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000 provides police officers with unique powers to examine people who pass through the United Kingdom’s borders. It allows them to stop, question and when necessary, search and detain individuals and goods travelling through the UK’s borders to determine whether they may be involved or concerned in the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism.As he refused he was either bailed or instructed to attend Folkstone Police Station last weekend which he did, in the meantime it is highly probable Kent Police asked a Court to authorise them to open his Phone to see what is on it, he was charged for refusal to do so back in July and bailed to attend Court, it does mean he is a Terrorist or suspected of Terrorism The Police do ask suspects in the UK arrested on a regular basis to give them their PIN Numbers for phones, laptops etc , Drug Dealers, Drug Suppliers, Paedophiles etc, if they refuse the Police apply to a Court to authorise them to do so its called RIPA The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (c. 23) (RIP or RIPA) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, regulating the powers of public bodies to carry out surveillance and investigation, and covering the interception of communications.[1] It was introduced by the Tony Blair Labour government ostensibly to take account of technological change such as the growth of the Internet and strong encryption.
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Oct 30, 2024 14:03:06 GMT
Is it possible some people have been given long custodial sentences for spreading misinformation that turned out to be essentially correct?
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Oct 30, 2024 14:11:46 GMT
Is it possible some people have been given long custodial sentences for spreading misinformation that turned out to be essentially correct? No idea how would I know
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Oct 30, 2024 14:18:18 GMT
Is it possible some people have been given long custodial sentences for spreading misinformation that turned out to be essentially correct? I would think it highly likely.
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Oct 30, 2024 14:30:30 GMT
Is it possible some people have been given long custodial sentences for spreading misinformation that turned out to be essentially correct? No idea how would I know Take a guess based on common sense.
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Oct 30, 2024 14:45:08 GMT
Take a guess based on common sense. In order to even contemplate a wild guess I would need to at least to know something about what these people did and said, as I don't I am not going to take a stab in the dark
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Oct 30, 2024 14:55:04 GMT
Take a guess based on common sense. In order to even contemplate a wild guess I would need to at least to know something about what these people did and said, as I don't I am not going to take a stab in the dark Well, if you recall events at the time, one of the significant contentions of the government was that the riots had been incited by people who spread a 'false rumour' - and that these people would be found and prosecuted. So, based on this, could you not take a stab in the dark on the basis of likelihood?
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Oct 30, 2024 15:44:10 GMT
In order to even contemplate a wild guess I would need to at least to know something about what these people did and said, as I don't I am not going to take a stab in the dark Well, if you recall events at the time, one of the significant contentions of the government was that the riots had been incited by people who spread a 'false rumour' - and that these people would be found and prosecuted. So, based on this, could you not take a stab in the dark on the basis of likelihood? There is no doubt that false rumours happened , if I recall correctly a rumour named a totally innocent young man that had a similar sounding name, if I recall correctly some years ago a man who lived alone on the South coast a rumour started that he was a Paedophile as recent arrest or arrests had been made locally Some people who lived near him attacked his house and daubed his house stating a Paedophile lives here get out and threw bricks at his house, all because some moron had heard he was a Philatelist and thought that meant he was a Paedophile and the rumour spread, he simply collected Stamps
|
|
|
Post by borgr0 on Oct 30, 2024 15:46:17 GMT
That is a compelling point by Handyman above ^
Equally, Orac's point in the other post is very true about spreading misinfo
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Oct 30, 2024 15:59:55 GMT
Well, if you recall events at the time, one of the significant contentions of the government was that the riots had been incited by people who spread a 'false rumour' - and that these people would be found and prosecuted. So, based on this, could you not take a stab in the dark on the basis of likelihood? There is no doubt that false rumours happened , if I recall correctly a rumour named a totally innocent young man that had a similar sounding name, if I recall correctly some years ago a man who lived alone on the South coast a rumour started that he was a Paedophile as recent arrest or arrests had been made locally Some people who lived near him attacked his house and daubed his house stating a Paedophile lives here get out and threw bricks at his house, all because some moron had heard he was a Philatelist and thought that meant he was a Paedophile and the rumour spread, he simply collected Stamps Indeed. Iirc the same thing happened to a Paediatrician some years ago . What’s more a local man living near Southend was accused of being a paedo by a so called Paedophile hunter . He was not a paedo and killed himself soon after.
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Oct 30, 2024 16:02:07 GMT
Well, if you recall events at the time, one of the significant contentions of the government was that the riots had been incited by people who spread a 'false rumour' - and that these people would be found and prosecuted. So, based on this, could you not take a stab in the dark on the basis of likelihood? There is no doubt that false rumours happened , if I recall correctly a rumour named a totally innocent young man that had a similar sounding name, if I recall correctly some years ago a man who lived alone on the South coast a rumour started that he was a Paedophile as recent arrest or arrests had been made locallyI sense you would rather talk about something else. Fair enough
|
|