Lets do it too.

What you propose is easily achieved by (a) repealing the Equality Act or (b) removing one or more specific 'protected characteristics' - age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage and civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex or sexual orientation - from the scope of the Act.

All it takes is a 'stroke of the pen', and the political will to do it.

Mr Farage's 'Contract with You' commits Reform to replace the Equality Act, but he doesn't say what with.

Anti white is being sold as equality.
Any argument against anti whiteness or white race baiting will be met by accusations of racism.
Ironic really.

Common sense and woke are very uneasy bedfellows. People who are afflicted with woke, and it is an affliction, belive feelings are more important than the truth and in particular, their feelings are more important than yours. And that's the start point. In other words, unless you're woke, you cant win. Which is why common sense and woke are very uneasy bedfellows.

And it must be said, as far as someone who is afflicted with woke is concerned, this shouldn't need to be explained. If it does then you're a nasty racist far right sexist islamophobic nazi bigot who needs to be shouted down and cancelled.   

Well somebody has to fly the flag for ethno-nationalism so I'll give it a go:

Separateness (in Afrikaans, apartheid) has attractions, but among its most obvious weaknesses were

(1) other times that it has been tried, the obvious lack of gelijkheid (equality),

(3) the fact that racial and cultural distinctions don't correspond closely enough to make it anything other than unfair and inefficient for the purpose that you propose.

(4) the fact that we have one economy, and breaking up the workforce and the market would turn it upside down and inside out, and

Thank you for the considered response, you make some obvious points that emphasise the challenges ahead.

As for muddling through, yes I agree that is traditionally the default approach amongst the GBP, as in 'Hanging on in quiet desperation is the English way', however it seems more likely that future events and developments may result in matters being taken out of their hands.

Much will depend on (a) whether the current strategy of betting the farm on 'integration and acculturation' proves to have been a sound investment, and (b) the extent to which political control comes to rest with the 'new' population as the demographic transformation proceeds.

I think we can learn much from studying other formerly 'white' societies which have gone though or are facing similar transformation. California in particular is a very interesting case, one where the 'Anglo' population became just another ethnic minority over twenty years ago.

There was little movement in the political landscape for quite a number of years since the incumbent Anglo politicians came to understand that in order to remain office they had to attend to the needs and wishes of their minority constituents even, if necessary, assigning them a higher priority than their erstwhile Anglo constituents. Although Britain is still a long way behind California from the perspective of demographic replacement we can already see signs of a similar political mindset developing here.

California's population led its political transformation since it was not until 2017 that Anglos became a minority in the state legislature. One of the very new initiatives taken by the 'ethnic' legislature was to declare California a 'sanctuary' state which would not cooperate with the federal authorities on immigration matters. In 2021 the legislature approved a new ordinance requiring all public schools in the state to provide courses in 'ethnic studies'. We can consider this as 'The Shape of Things to Come' in California and other states that have already, or soon will attain 'majority minority' status.

As we watch all this unfolding the question becomes: How likely is it that the UK will follow California's lead, and how will the host population respond?