|
|
Post by happyjack on Oct 5, 2024 9:50:22 GMT
And I repeat again that it might seem like a perfectly reasonable first thought if you are an anti-immigration obsessive, but that would only be because your obsession has fucked you up to the point where you no longer recognise what is reasonable and what is not. You dont seem to realise how ridiculous your argument is . 1 Think about the victim “ poor thing “ then think ‘ I wonder what kind of person would do that “ = commendable 2 Wonder what kind of person would do that then think “ poor thing “ about the victim = contemptible. It’s a risible subjective non argument . To read that report and immediately think “illegal immigrant” rather than of the victim, as Jonksy has said that the majority of those who can do joined up thinking would do, is contemptible. And anyone who thinks that is risible is almost certainly an anti-immigrant obsessive who no longer understands what is reasonable and what is not. |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Oct 5, 2024 9:52:56 GMT
And I repeat again that it might seem like a perfectly reasonable first thought to anti-immigration obsessives, but that would only be because their obsession has fucked them up to the point where they no longer recognise what is reasonable and what is not. The irony.
No one's first thought was his immigration status (well, apart from yours obviously).
Everyone else was appalled by the crime and then considered the wholly unnecessary nature of it and the process that lead up to it.
Not according to Jonksy. Here’s what he said on the first page “It's the first thing that comes into the head of the majority of those who can understand joined up thinking..”. That obviously passed you by |
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Oct 5, 2024 9:53:48 GMT
You lack understanding of basic norms in this country and when that is pointed out to you you lie about it. You have spent most of the thread attacking other members for their honesty which is based on the information they have been given. You object to honesty, you post lies and you refuse to accept any responsibility for your shameless behaviour when exposed. You lost all arguments, all potential respect and all further attempts to be seen as genuine. You now lie about me being anti-immigrant when I have not given you any reason to accuse me of such a thing.
You are clearly not here for honest discussion.
Yes I do and no I don’t. If you want to have a discussion then you first have to grasp what I have said which is something that you have failed to do so far, despite it being repeatedly and clearly stated. You need to free your mind from any anti-immigration prejudices that it may carry and read what my words actually say rather than what those prejudices might be forcing you to think it is that I am saying. Maybe you are not up to that but that’s for you to decide. You rely on smearing people based on those lies of yours, which everyone else can see. You're not competent enough to bait me. All that matters now is that you're exposed and defeated, and all you can do now is to continue to troll the thread posting lie after lie. Sad, isn't it?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Oct 5, 2024 9:58:33 GMT
To read that report and immediately think “illegal immigrant” rather than of the victim, as Jonksy has said that the majority of those who can do joined up thinking would do, is contemptible... Why? If the immigrant wasn't here, the crime couldn't have happened. If you can't grasp that then it's you that has a problem with joined up thinking. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Oct 5, 2024 10:01:10 GMT
You dont seem to realise how ridiculous your argument is . 1 Think about the victim “ poor thing “ then think ‘ I wonder what kind of person would do that “ = commendable 2 Wonder what kind of person would do that then think “ poor thing “ about the victim = contemptible. It’s a risible subjective non argument . To read that report and immediately think “illegal immigrant” rather than of the victim, as Jonksy has said that the majority of those who can do joined up thinking would do, is contemptible. And anyone who thinks that is risible is almost certainly an anti-immigrant obsessive who no longer understands what is reasonable and what is not. Only in the world of self deluded virtue signallers . To wonder what kind of person would do that and suspect that it was a person who colluded with criminal traffickers to enter this country is quite reasonable, especially when one sees the name . It’s ironic that you display a knee jerk judgement in response to what you claim is a knee jerk judgmental attitude ..ironic and hypocritical. |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Oct 5, 2024 10:07:06 GMT
To read that report and immediately think “illegal immigrant” rather than of the victim, as Jonksy has said that the majority of those who can do joined up thinking would do, is contemptible... Why? If the immigrant wasn't here, the crime couldn't have happened. If you can't grasp that then it's you that has a problem with joined up thinking. What immigrant? We seem to have gone from people immediately thinking “ illegal immigrant” to the certainty that the accused is an immigrant. |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Oct 5, 2024 10:07:40 GMT
Yes I do and no I don’t. If you want to have a discussion then you first have to grasp what I have said which is something that you have failed to do so far, despite it being repeatedly and clearly stated. You need to free your mind from any anti-immigration prejudices that it may carry and read what my words actually say rather than what those prejudices might be forcing you to think it is that I am saying. Maybe you are not up to that but that’s for you to decide. You rely on smearing people based on those lies of yours, which everyone else can see. You're not competent enough to bait me. All that matters now is that you're exposed and defeated, and all you can do now is to continue to troll the thread posting lie after lie. Sad, isn't it?
Evidence of my lies, please |
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Oct 5, 2024 10:10:24 GMT
Yes I do and no I don’t. If you want to have a discussion then you first have to grasp what I have said which is something that you have failed to do so far, despite it being repeatedly and clearly stated. You need to free your mind from any anti-immigration prejudices that it may carry and read what my words actually say rather than what those prejudices might be forcing you to think it is that I am saying. Maybe you are not up to that but that’s for you to decide. You rely on smearing people based on those lies of yours, which everyone else can see. You're not competent enough to bait me. All that matters now is that you're exposed and defeated, and all you can do now is to continue to troll the thread posting lie after lie. Sad, isn't it?
I provide the evidence to Happyjacks lies, and all he does is tell more lies, so I'm not playing his troll game any longer. To read that report and immediately think “illegal immigrant” rather than of the victim, as Jonksy has said that the majority of those who can do joined up thinking would do, is contemptible... Why? If the immigrant wasn't here, the crime couldn't have happened. If you can't grasp that then it's you that has a problem with joined up thinking. He's using this crime to attack the innocent. |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Oct 5, 2024 10:10:44 GMT
To read that report and immediately think “illegal immigrant” rather than of the victim, as Jonksy has said that the majority of those who can do joined up thinking would do, is contemptible. And anyone who thinks that is risible is almost certainly an anti-immigrant obsessive who no longer understands what is reasonable and what is not. Only in the world of self deluded virtue signallers . To wonder what kind of person would do that and suspect that it was a person who colluded with criminal traffickers to enter this country is quite reasonable, especially when one sees the name . It’s ironic that you display a knee jerk judgement in response to what you claim is a knee jerk judgmental attitude ..ironic and hypocritical. That last bit is a bit too cryptic for me but the rest of what you say is only reasonable if the person saying it is an anti-immigrant obsessive who no longer understands what is reasonable and what is not. |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Oct 5, 2024 10:11:43 GMT
You rely on smearing people based on those lies of yours, which everyone else can see. You're not competent enough to bait me. All that matters now is that you're exposed and defeated, and all you can do now is to continue to troll the thread posting lie after lie. Sad, isn't it?
I provide the evidence to Happyjacks lies, and all he does is tell more lies, so I'm not playing his troll game any longer. Why? If the immigrant wasn't here, the crime couldn't have happened. If you can't grasp that then it's you that has a problem with joined up thinking. He's using this crime to attack the innocent. Where is you evidence that I lie? |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Oct 5, 2024 10:14:37 GMT
Only in the world of self deluded virtue signallers . To wonder what kind of person would do that and suspect that it was a person who colluded with criminal traffickers to enter this country is quite reasonable, especially when one sees the name . It’s ironic that you display a knee jerk judgement in response to what you claim is a knee jerk judgmental attitude ..ironic and hypocritical. That last bit is a bit too cryptic for me but the rest of what you say is only reasonable if the person saying it is an anti-immigrant obsessive who no longer understands what is reasonable and what is not. You are being judgmental about other people being judgmental. Only a deluded virtue signaller would be unaware of the irony . |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Oct 5, 2024 10:14:56 GMT
You rely on smearing people based on those lies of yours, which everyone else can see. You're not competent enough to bait me. All that matters now is that you're exposed and defeated, and all you can do now is to continue to troll the thread posting lie after lie. Sad, isn't it?
I provide the evidence to Happyjacks lies, and all he does is tell more lies, so I'm not playing his troll game any longer. Why? If the immigrant wasn't here, the crime couldn't have happened. If you can't grasp that then it's you that has a problem with joined up thinking. He's using this crime to attack the innocent. Once again, evidence of my lies, please. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Oct 5, 2024 10:25:46 GMT
What immigrant? We seem to have gone from people immediately thinking “ illegal immigrant” to the certainty that the accused is an immigrant. He's a Somalian immigrant. |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Oct 5, 2024 10:26:48 GMT
What immigrant? We seem to have gone from people immediately thinking “ illegal immigrant” to the certainty that the accused is an immigrant. He's a Somalian immigrant. So he is not an illegal immigrant then? |
|
|
|
Post by happyjack on Oct 5, 2024 10:28:40 GMT
You are being judgmental about other people being judgmental. Only a deluded virtue signaller would be unaware of the irony . He keeps making demands to prove he's telling lies, even though he just posts more lies as a reponse to every post that corrects his dishonest claims and lies. Once it's established that it's just a sociopathic troll there's no progress to be made from that point. In which case, if what you say is true, then you will have plenty of evidence to back up your claim that I am telling all these lies. Let’s see it please |
|
