|
|
Post by Handyman on Sept 24, 2024 19:13:30 GMT
The majority of people who are now in their 60's 70', and 80's have paid NI and Income Tax on their earnings for years some for 50 years, if they had not there would NO NHS and No State Pension
|
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Sept 25, 2024 21:50:32 GMT
And Labour's answer is to waste more taxpayers money on the wrong policies, like fat busting jabs for children instead of PE lessons.
|
|
|
|
Post by patman post on Sept 26, 2024 14:40:12 GMT
How much do products of immigrant inbreeding with close family cost the NHS? Not only can they not work but they require intensive care on the NHS. In addition, they and their carers will receive all sorts of benefits, mobility aids, and their houses will have to be adapted to meet their needs, and it all adds up to a drain on the country. That is not all. Black and Asians more susceptible to heart disease and Type 2 diabetes by a factor of 4, black people much more likely to suffer mental health issues, black and brown immigrants arrive from countries with poor health regimes and often poor diets requiring significant health care at the outset of free care. Black men more likely to suffer prostate cancer. Black women more likely to suffer late stage cancer diagnosis. Type 2 diabetes accounts for more than 10% of the NHS costs so is a significant problem. I guess there could be an argument for specific health care to be concentrated on where diseases are most prevalent — eg, in Europe where Europeans are most susceptible such as hereditary and type 1 haemochromatosis, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's, type 2 diabetes, and cystic fibrosis — the most common genetic disease among people of European descent.
A study, published in the journal Nature, finds that European-Americans have developed a huge batch of potentially harmful genetic mutations — many more than African-Americans... |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Sept 26, 2024 15:39:29 GMT
That is not all. Black and Asians more susceptible to heart disease and Type 2 diabetes by a factor of 4, black people much more likely to suffer mental health issues, black and brown immigrants arrive from countries with poor health regimes and often poor diets requiring significant health care at the outset of free care. Black men more likely to suffer prostate cancer. Black women more likely to suffer late stage cancer diagnosis. Type 2 diabetes accounts for more than 10% of the NHS costs so is a significant problem. I guess there could be an argument for specific health care to be concentrated on where diseases are most prevalent — eg, in Europe where Europeans are most susceptible such as hereditary and type 1 haemochromatosis, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer's, type 2 diabetes, and cystic fibrosis — the most common genetic disease among people of European descent.
A study, published in the journal Nature, finds that European-Americans have developed a huge batch of potentially harmful genetic mutations — many more than African-Americans... And as your link says most are rare diseases. My point was that in terms of susceptibility to many common conditions the ethnic minority population are generally more susceptible by varying factors up to 7. Some of these conditions are ones that have a huge impact on NHS costs such as Type 2 diabetes which we all agree is becoming increasingly more common but is much more likely to affect Sub Continent and African people than white Europeans. The bringing in of small numbers of people is a boon to the general genetic well being of any population I do not dispute that but if we are to consider NHS costs, and the often reference to the cost of an aging population, it makes no to little sense to bring in in large numbers of those whose initial health care form infancy has been poor and who are demonstrably much more susceptible to conditions that are large existing costs to the NHS. |
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Sept 27, 2024 13:33:34 GMT
Labour's answer: Let them freeze.
|
|
