|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Sept 19, 2024 17:10:19 GMT
what makes you think they told the landlord the truth when booking the function room Did they? |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Sept 19, 2024 18:18:27 GMT
They had PAID to use the room. Read the article... Errm, I did. That makes no difference. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Sept 19, 2024 18:20:12 GMT
They had PAID to use the room. Read the article... Errm, I did. That makes no difference. Of course it makes a fucking difference. So you are stating that he took money from that group under false pretences.. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Sept 19, 2024 18:21:15 GMT
Errm, I did. That makes no difference. Of course it makes a fucking difference. So you are stating that he took money from that group under false pretences.. No, I'm saying that he still retains the right to withdraw permission. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Sept 19, 2024 18:23:34 GMT
Of course it makes a fucking difference. So you are stating that he took money from that group under false pretences.. No, I'm saying that he still retains the right to withdraw permission. We all know you would stick up for the arsehole andrea. And what gave the arsehole the right to hound that group when they had vacated his pub? |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Sept 19, 2024 18:34:25 GMT
Of course it makes a fucking difference. So you are stating that he took money from that group under false pretences.. No, I'm saying that he still retains the right to withdraw permission. Anyone with a atom of sense would know the landlord took the booking and money knowing full well the booking was controversial, not only has the snivelling little rat landlord took money under false pretenses, he's also got FREE PUBLICITY to his woke lefty shithole boozer, well I hope it spectacularly backfire on him like it normally does ....... daft twat. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Sept 19, 2024 18:50:11 GMT
A view from the comments section
“ Firstly, trespass is a civil offence, and you can't retroactively use it for a group who have booked and paid to be in a room, thus they are not trespassing. If the group were not causing trouble, and in a private room, they were entitled to the Landlord ensuring their privacy. To take action to have them removed, merely someone didn't like what they were saying is a breach of contract and they should have informed the security and landlord that they have no legal grounds to remove them, merely because someone not in the room complained about their discussion.
Also, by following them to another pub, and taking action to remove them from that one, the security team are using illegal tactics to harrass this group.”
|
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Sept 19, 2024 21:47:43 GMT
Pubs used to be a place for discussion, but as we can see the authoritarian left won't allow it anywhere.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Sept 19, 2024 22:17:36 GMT
No, I'm saying that he still retains the right to withdraw permission. Anyone with a atom of sense would know the landlord took the booking and money knowing full well the booking was controversial, not only has the snivelling little rat landlord took money under false pretenses, he's also got FREE PUBLICITY to his woke lefty shithole boozer, well I hope it spectacularly backfire on him like it normally does ....... daft twat. Typical fucking lefty who is just in it for the money. If that landlord was down in this neck of the woods his pub would be boycotted and would die a natural. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Sept 19, 2024 22:24:23 GMT
Don’t forget the pub is in Brighton. Brighton is the woke centre of the universe .
|
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Sept 20, 2024 7:10:59 GMT
No, I'm saying that he still retains the right to withdraw permission. Anyone with a atom of sense would know the landlord took the booking and money knowing full well the booking was controversial, not only has the snivelling little rat landlord took money under false pretenses, he's also got FREE PUBLICITY to his woke lefty shithole boozer, well I hope it spectacularly backfire on him like it normally does ....... daft twat. Did hetake money? The function room might of been free |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Sept 20, 2024 7:17:10 GMT
Anyone with a atom of sense would know the landlord took the booking and money knowing full well the booking was controversial, not only has the snivelling little rat landlord took money under false pretenses, he's also got FREE PUBLICITY to his woke lefty shithole boozer, well I hope it spectacularly backfire on him like it normally does ....... daft twat. Did hetake money? The function room might of been free Read the frigging article lefty. |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Sept 20, 2024 7:33:20 GMT
Of course it makes a fucking difference. So you are stating that he took money from that group under false pretences.. No, I'm saying that he still retains the right to withdraw permission. Not if there is a hire agreement for the room and usually there is. He can only kick them out then if they are breaking the terms of that contract and it is hard to see what terms they were breaking and realistically he would have to define them. |
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Sept 20, 2024 8:24:34 GMT
Did hetake money? The function room might of been free Read the frigging article lefty. Cant take what the DM says serious |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Sept 20, 2024 8:31:06 GMT
Read the frigging article lefty. Cant take what the DM says serious Pot and kettle ^ 😁 |
|
