|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 21, 2024 10:50:44 GMT
I never said they were. I was questioning the influence Trump would have over British elections. If you need me to explain that to you I question why you are on a political forum. What was the last British GE that you would say was decisively influenced by incumbent US President? |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 21, 2024 10:54:36 GMT
If you need me to explain that to you I question why you are on a political forum. What was the last British GE that you would say was decisively influenced by incumbent US President? Trump can destroy Labour with trade deals, not cooperating with them, in fact be damn right hostile to them, like they are with him.
By the time the next GE comes round Trump will have made sure Labour are damaged goods, while Farage will score political points and benefit from it, the Trump does not directly influence the British people, it is the damage he can do indirectly to trash Labour.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Aug 21, 2024 10:59:28 GMT
I've got news for you, it isn't the British people voting in US Presidential elections. I never said they were. I was questioning the influence Trump would have over British elections. Why? The thread is about Khan and his abuse of office. |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 21, 2024 11:01:49 GMT
What was the last British GE that you would say was decisively influenced by incumbent US President? Trump can destroy Labour with trade deals, not cooperating with them, in fact be damn right hostile to them, like they are with him.
By the time the next GE comes round Trump will have made sure Labour are damaged goods, while Farage will score political points and benefit from it, the Trump does not directly influence the British people, it is the damage he can do indirectly to trash Labour.
So we still won't have the Trump trade deal that was being mooted during the Brexit years? Situation normal then. |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 21, 2024 11:02:18 GMT
I never said they were. I was questioning the influence Trump would have over British elections. Why? The thread is about Khan and his abuse of office. FS brought it up, take up with him. |
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Aug 21, 2024 11:10:25 GMT
Why? The thread is about Khan and his abuse of office. FS brought it up, take up with him. Only so far as to highight Khan's abuse of office. All you've done is attempt to defend Khan's abuse of office whilst making outlandish claims that he speaks for the country. |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 21, 2024 11:13:34 GMT
FS brought it up, take up with him. Only so far as to highight Khan's abuse of office. All you've done is attempt to defend Khan's abuse of office whilst making outlandish claims that he speaks for the country. I challenged a comment FS made about Trump, he introduced Trump to the discussion. When did I say he spoke for the country? |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 21, 2024 11:14:52 GMT
I'm not posting a false claim, I made no claim. Would you like to answer my question now? You posted a false claim and hid behind a question mark. Would you like to answer my question now? I have answered your question, I didn't make a false claim I asked a question. Your failure to answer my question is noted, I'll leave it there. |
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Aug 21, 2024 11:16:22 GMT
Only so far as to highight Khan's abuse of office. All you've done is attempt to defend Khan's abuse of office whilst making outlandish claims that he speaks for the country. I challenged a comment FS made about Trump, he introduced Trump to the discussion. When did I say he spoke for the country? When you started relying on dodgy polls to big up Harris over Trump, which is an irrelevant comparison and has absolutely no meaning in regards to Khan's abuse of office that FS was addressing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 21, 2024 11:17:30 GMT
You posted a false claim and hid behind a question mark. Would you like to answer my question now? I have answered your question, I didn't make a false claim I asked a question. Your failure to answer my question is noted, I'll leave it there. You didn’t answer a question. You just posted a denial. Your failure to answer my question is noted, Yes you will leave it there won’t you? |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 21, 2024 11:21:55 GMT
Only so far as to highight Khan's abuse of office. All you've done is attempt to defend Khan's abuse of office whilst making outlandish claims that he speaks for the country. I challenged a comment FS made about Trump, he introduced Trump to the discussion. When did I say he spoke for the country? I was responding to your challenge why a British poll favoured Harris over Trump, I do not think such poll exists, except maybe in your own head. |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 21, 2024 11:23:29 GMT
I challenged a comment FS made about Trump, he introduced Trump to the discussion. When did I say he spoke for the country? When you started relying on dodgy polls to big up Harris over Trump, which is an irrelevant comparison and has absolutely no meaning in regards to Khan's abuse of office that FS was addressing.
Which polls would you consider reliable? It was entirely relevant to FS' comments. |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 21, 2024 11:25:21 GMT
I challenged a comment FS made about Trump, he introduced Trump to the discussion. When did I say he spoke for the country? I was responding to your challenge why a British poll favoured Harris over Trump, I do not think such poll exists, except maybe in your own head. The conversation started by me responding to this comment from you: "Khan has OPENLY admitted he doesn't want Trump as President, and wants a Black President, he has also spoken on behalf of the Labour government, to which Starmer has not refuted that Labour are endorsing Harris, Labour are breaching Parliamentary code by interfering in US Presidential elections, and of course getting away with it because they are Labour and they are making up their own rules." And: "This is how dumb Labour are, if Trump becomes President it's likely the only UK politician he will deal with is Farage, dumb Labour do not know how powerful and influential a US President can be, Trump will put Farage on the road to electoral victory, while destroying Labour doing so ... they really are thick, and I mean thick." If you don't want to continue the discussion then stop contributing. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 21, 2024 11:34:08 GMT
I was responding to your challenge why a British poll favoured Harris over Trump, I do not think such poll exists, except maybe in your own head. The conversation started by me responding to this comment from you: "Khan has OPENLY admitted he doesn't want Trump as President, and wants a Black President, he has also spoken on behalf of the Labour government, to which Starmer has not refuted that Labour are endorsing Harris, Labour are breaching Parliamentary code by interfering in US Presidential elections, and of course getting away with it because they are Labour and they are making up their own rules." And: "This is how dumb Labour are, if Trump becomes President it's likely the only UK politician he will deal with is Farage, dumb Labour do not know how powerful and influential a US President can be, Trump will put Farage on the road to electoral victory, while destroying Labour doing so ... they really are thick, and I mean thick." If you don't want to continue the discussion then stop contributing. What point are you making, the OP was Khan trashing Trump while endorsing Harris, and according to him he speaks on behalf of the Labour party (which they have not denied so far), your response was some dodgy British poll favouring Harris over Trump for the Presidential election, and I pointed out it's not the UK people who will be voting in the US Presidential race, I then pointed out that if Trump does become the next US President he will seek revenge on Khan/Labour for trashing him.
What UK serving government in their right mind would get involved in US Presidential elections knowing full well that who ever wins they will need to do business with, are they completely and utterly MAD?
|
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Aug 21, 2024 11:35:19 GMT
When you started relying on dodgy polls to big up Harris over Trump, which is an irrelevant comparison and has absolutely no meaning in regards to Khan's abuse of office that FS was addressing.
Which polls would you consider reliable? It was entirely relevant to FS' comments. No it wasn't. It had no relevance whatsoever and you know it. If you support Khan's abuse of office then just say so. |
|
