|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Aug 20, 2024 18:22:06 GMT
The fact that you want someone sacked for something they didn't do tells me all about the "fair society" that you believe in. Well THATS how the left work Shout about what the non left believe in hope they'll lose their fucking job I hope you criticised Diane Abbott for wanting BNP members sacked. |
|
|
|
Post by patman post on Aug 20, 2024 18:50:31 GMT
The fact that you want someone sacked for something they didn't do tells me all about the "fair society" that you believe in. Well THATS how the left work Shout about what the non left believe in hope they'll lose their fucking job I hope you criticised Diane Abbott for wanting BNP members sacked. The Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo) outlawed joining the BNP for police and staff in England and Wales 20 years ago. No member of the police service, whether police officer or police staff, may be a member of an organisation whose constitution, aims, objectives or pronouncements contradict the general duty to promote race equality. The ban specifically included the BNP.
Some 30 years ago, Stoke Newington Police Station was pulled down and rebuilt because of the local force's relationship with and attitudes to the local community. The front steps — a stumbling point for many of those helping the police with their inquiries — were not included in the new design. At the time, many Stoke Newington officers were from Dagenham — a notorious BNP stronghold.
Some activities of Stoke Newington police was noticed in Parliament:
That this House condemns those nasty, vile and corrupt police officers at Stoke Newington police station who have been engaged in drug trafficking and perverting the course of justice; is appalled that these officers should have betrayed the trust of people in Hackney in general as well as the trust of those who live in and around Sandringham Road, particularly those represented by the Montague Residents Association; notes that these officers have made a mockery of the way in which Hackney Council has co-operated with the police to get rid of drug dealing in Sandringham Road; notes that it now seems certain that at meetings and by letter Chief Superintendent Roy Clarke from Stoke Newington police station has misled the honourable Member for Hackney South and Shoreditch about the true nature of the problems because he himself has been duped by his own police officers; believes that this is a savage reflection of the greed and corruption of Tory Britain; and calls on the Home Secretary to set up an independent judicial enquiry.
I reckon sacking for some beliefs and actions is correct and justifiable...
|
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Aug 20, 2024 20:28:46 GMT
The fact that you want someone sacked for something they didn't do tells me all about the "fair society" that you believe in. Well THATS how the left work Shout about what the non left believe in hope they'll lose their fucking job I hope you criticised Diane Abbott for wanting BNP members sacked. Nope it is exactly what Rightists repeatedly did against New Labour politicians. Rightists and the Tory press excel in denigration and insinuation against Labour. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Aug 20, 2024 20:33:50 GMT
Anyways, I am quite enjoying watching Labour shit in their own hands and clap. There's going to be a whole lot of chickens coming home to roost.  Says the extremist who believes in his own crystal ball LOL |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Aug 20, 2024 23:31:17 GMT
Well THATS how the left work Shout about what the non left believe in hope they'll lose their fucking job I hope you criticised Diane Abbott for wanting BNP members sacked. The Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo) outlawed joining the BNP for police and staff in England and Wales 20 years ago. No member of the police service, whether police officer or police staff, may be a member of an organisation whose constitution, aims, objectives or pronouncements contradict the general duty to promote race equality. The ban specifically included the BNP.
Some 30 years ago, Stoke Newington Police Station was pulled down and rebuilt because of the local force's relationship with and attitudes to the local community. The front steps — a stumbling point for many of those helping the police with their inquiries — were not included in the new design. At the time, many Stoke Newington officers were from Dagenham — a notorious BNP stronghold.
Some activities of Stoke Newington police was noticed in Parliament:
That this House condemns those nasty, vile and corrupt police officers at Stoke Newington police station who have been engaged in drug trafficking and perverting the course of justice; is appalled that these officers should have betrayed the trust of people in Hackney in general as well as the trust of those who live in and around Sandringham Road, particularly those represented by the Montague Residents Association; notes that these officers have made a mockery of the way in which Hackney Council has co-operated with the police to get rid of drug dealing in Sandringham Road; notes that it now seems certain that at meetings and by letter Chief Superintendent Roy Clarke from Stoke Newington police station has misled the honourable Member for Hackney South and Shoreditch about the true nature of the problems because he himself has been duped by his own police officers; believes that this is a savage reflection of the greed and corruption of Tory Britain; and calls on the Home Secretary to set up an independent judicial enquiry.
I reckon sacking for some beliefs and actions is correct and justifiable...
Do you have any views that aren't rooted in the decades before you were born? |
|
|
|
Post by sandypine on Aug 21, 2024 6:59:52 GMT
Well THATS how the left work Shout about what the non left believe in hope they'll lose their fucking job I hope you criticised Diane Abbott for wanting BNP members sacked. The Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo) outlawed joining the BNP for police and staff in England and Wales 20 years ago. No member of the police service, whether police officer or police staff, may be a member of an organisation whose constitution, aims, objectives or pronouncements contradict the general duty to promote race equality. The ban specifically included the BNP.
Some 30 years ago, Stoke Newington Police Station was pulled down and rebuilt because of the local force's relationship with and attitudes to the local community. The front steps — a stumbling point for many of those helping the police with their inquiries — were not included in the new design. At the time, many Stoke Newington officers were from Dagenham — a notorious BNP stronghold.
Some activities of Stoke Newington police was noticed in Parliament:
That this House condemns those nasty, vile and corrupt police officers at Stoke Newington police station who have been engaged in drug trafficking and perverting the course of justice; is appalled that these officers should have betrayed the trust of people in Hackney in general as well as the trust of those who live in and around Sandringham Road, particularly those represented by the Montague Residents Association; notes that these officers have made a mockery of the way in which Hackney Council has co-operated with the police to get rid of drug dealing in Sandringham Road; notes that it now seems certain that at meetings and by letter Chief Superintendent Roy Clarke from Stoke Newington police station has misled the honourable Member for Hackney South and Shoreditch about the true nature of the problems because he himself has been duped by his own police officers; believes that this is a savage reflection of the greed and corruption of Tory Britain; and calls on the Home Secretary to set up an independent judicial enquiry.
I reckon sacking for some beliefs and actions is correct and justifiable...
You do indeed but the promotion of race equality is not a political stance it is the acceptance of race equality that is the political goal clearly stated. That acceptance is at odds with many organisations and belief systems in the UK yet is only activated in the case of BNP who do not promote race inequality as all they sought was identical rights that all races throughout the world do. The BPA state clearly that the races are unequal by their membership stance. How can a belief system that says one who believes is the best of people and one who does not is as of cattle be accepted as being OK when others that do not even come close to this belief are outlawed. It is strange unequal and dangerous times we live in. |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 21, 2024 7:09:14 GMT
Is it? Every single person who genuinely believes in free speech is in favor of permitting people to say or express things they don't endorse. Governments permit opposition parties to broadcast party political broadcasts doesn't mean they endorse the message. Yes. What party political message did the balloon broadcast ? What party did the message support ? I never said that the balloon broadcast a party political message, I used the example of a government permitting an opposition party political broadcast to explain to you the difference between permitting and endorsing something. |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 21, 2024 7:26:28 GMT
Permitting something and endorsing it are not the same, though they are related concepts. - **Permitting** something means allowing it to happen or not taking action to prevent it. When you permit something, you acknowledge that it can occur, but you aren't necessarily expressing approval or support for it. It can simply mean you are tolerating or accepting it as permissible under certain rules or circumstances. - **Endorsing** something, on the other hand, means actively supporting, approving, or recommending it. Endorsement is a stronger statement that indicates agreement with or advocacy for the thing in question. In essence, permission is more passive, while endorsement is active. You can permit something without endorsing it, meaning you allow it to happen without necessarily agreeing with or supporting it. Bollocks. Allowing the POTUS to be insulted and subject to ridicule was not a passive act. Don’t insult your own intelligence by posting this shit. I thought little hornet posted utter crap by comparing it with allowing party political broadcasts but you have even supposed that . So you want to stifle the British people's freedom of expression because a balloon hurt your feelings? Sounds rather snowflakey to me. |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 21, 2024 7:35:24 GMT
Unfortunately, the idiots in London keep electing him. Hmmm... No.
As with the current government, only about 1 in 6 of the electorate voted Khan.
The majority voted "None of the above".
Both Khan and Starmer won their respective elections under the rules agreed by all parties who contested them. The majority of the electorate didn't vote for the last Tory government, I don't recall you ever mentioning that. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Aug 21, 2024 7:45:46 GMT
Yes. What party political message did the balloon broadcast ? What party did the message support ? I never said that the balloon broadcast a party political message, I used the example of a government permitting an opposition party political broadcast to explain to you the difference between permitting and endorsing something. He doesn't get it. |
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 21, 2024 7:48:05 GMT
I never said that the balloon broadcast a party political message, I used the example of a government permitting an opposition party political broadcast to explain to you the difference between permitting and endorsing something. He doesn't get it. Or is pretending he doesn't. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 21, 2024 8:15:15 GMT
Or is pretending he doesn't. Well if anyone with a atom of sense didn't realise at the time of the Trump balloon that it had political racial overtones, be in no doubt now.
Khan has OPENLY admitted he doesn't want Trump as President, and wants a Black President, he has also spoken on behalf of the Labour government, to which Starmer has not refuted that Labour are endorsing Harris, Labour are breaching Parliamentary code by interfering in US Presidential elections, and of course getting away with it because they are Labour and they are making up their own rules.
|
|
|
|
Post by happyhornet3 on Aug 21, 2024 9:03:02 GMT
Or is pretending he doesn't. Well if anyone with a atom of sense didn't realise at the time of the Trump balloon that it had political racial overtones, be in no doubt now.
Khan has OPENLY admitted he doesn't want Trump as President, and wants a Black President, he has also spoken on behalf of the Labour government, to which Starmer has not refuted that Labour are endorsing Harris, Labour are breaching Parliamentary code by interfering in US Presidential elections, and of course getting away with it because they are Labour and they are making up their own rules.
Haven't a number of Tory MPs openly expressed their support for Trump? |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 21, 2024 9:09:44 GMT
Well if anyone with a atom of sense didn't realise at the time of the Trump balloon that it had political racial overtones, be in no doubt now.
Khan has OPENLY admitted he doesn't want Trump as President, and wants a Black President, he has also spoken on behalf of the Labour government, to which Starmer has not refuted that Labour are endorsing Harris, Labour are breaching Parliamentary code by interfering in US Presidential elections, and of course getting away with it because they are Labour and they are making up their own rules.
Haven't a number of Tory MPs openly expressed their support for Trump? Have they openly disrespected or trashed Biden, like the Labour party have with Trump, including Lammy, Thornberry who have openly called him a sex pest, why Trump hasn't sued the pair of wasters I'll never know. Name one Tory who has defamed a US President present or past? Labour get away with things the Tories can't .... FACT. |
|
|
|
Post by Rebirth on Aug 21, 2024 9:42:02 GMT
The fact that you want someone sacked for something they didn't do tells me all about the "fair society" that you believe in. Well THATS how the left work Shout about what the non left believe in hope they'll lose their fucking job I hope you criticised Diane Abbott for wanting BNP members sacked. You can't expect them to acknowledge their own double-standards.
Sadiq Khan's extremist mates down at the extremists are us London Mosque are blaming Israel and the Jews for the riots. Hamas Islamists don't feel safe in Britain.
|
|
