|
Post by Bentley on Jun 24, 2024 16:12:27 GMT
MOST Tory Newspapers have lashed out at Farage for his comments on Ukraine, including The Telegraph and The Daily Mail, even Boris Johnson has called his claims "repugnant". Some of the worst criticism of Farage has come from the Tories NOT Labour, and NOT from the BBC. The Financial Times has heavily criticised Farage, and The Ministry of Defence has also come out with a Myth Busting statement, which pushes against Nigel Farages claim that "NATO is encircling Russia", the MoD statement includes a video which explains and points out that only 11% of Russias land borders are with NATO. Meanwhile, over in that bastion of the Free Press, RUSSIA, the media there have jumped on Farage's claims, and so he's now become a hero in Russia. Well, he's a right little Quisling isn't he ? Of course the west will condemn him and lefties will hitch a ride in the bandwagon . Sensible people will be happy that he has the guts to open up the subject again .
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jun 24, 2024 16:15:47 GMT
According to Witchy the Guardian is a little Quisling “ Russia’s military offensive against Ukraine is an act of aggression that will make already worrisome tensions between Nato and Moscow even more dangerous. The west’s new cold war with Russia has turned hot. Vladimir Putin bears primary responsibility for this latest development, but Nato’s arrogant, tone‐deaf policy toward Russia over the past quarter‐century deserves a large share as well. Analysts committed to a US foreign policy of realism and restraint have warned for more than a quarter‐century that continuing to expand the most powerful military alliance in history toward another major power would not end well. The war in Ukraine provides definitive confirmation that it did not.” www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/feb/28/nato-expansion-war-russia-ukraine?CMP=Share_iOSApp_OtherHeres another ”Among others, Biden’s CIA director, William J. Burns, has been warning about the provocative effect of NATO expansion on Russia since 1995. That’s when Burns, then a political officer in the U.S. Embassy in Moscow, reported to Washington that “hostility to early NATO expansion is almost universally felt across the domestic political spectrum here. Lost in the outrage over Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is the fact that many in the West have long warned that widespread NATO expansion into Eastern Europe coul… theconversation.com/ukraine-war-follows-decades-of-warnings-that-nato-expansion-into-eastern-europe-could-provoke-russia-177999And another “Chomsky believes that the main 'background' of this war, a factor that is missing in mainstream media coverage, is "NATO expansion." www.commondreams.org/views/2022/06/25/not-justification-provocation-chomsky-root-causes-russia-ukraine-warMore Quislings ( according to Witchy )from the Guardian . ”The current confrontation between Russia and the west is fuelled by many grievances, but the greatest is the belief in Moscow that the west tricked the former Soviet Union by breaking promises made at the end of the cold war in 1989-1990 that Nato would not expand to the east. In his now famous 2007 speech to the Munich Security Conference, Vladimir Putin accused the west of forgetting and breaking assurances, leaving international law in ruins.” www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jan/12/russias-belief-in-nato-betrayal-and-why-it-matters-today?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jun 24, 2024 17:04:20 GMT
According to Witchy the Guardian is a little Quisling.... I know - it's pathetic isn't it?. When people like the Pope and Joe Biden are held up as a quislings you know that some people have lost the plot totally.. Why cant some people understand that there are a range of views - not all that you may agree with.
|
|
|
Post by witchfinder on Jun 25, 2024 7:36:34 GMT
I made an interesting observation tonight on SKY News, the news anchor made reference to Rishi Sunaks decision to leave the D Day commemorations. He said it was a huge error, but then went on to say that it "was a mistake of his own making".
You would never hear a BBC News reader say such a thing, and over and over again I see both Channel 4 News and SKY News making statements and comments that you would never hear on BBC News.
Krishnan Guru-Murthy of Channel 4 News goes to extrodinary lengths to to criticise, sometimes ridicule politicians if they attempt to to duck a question, or give "standard avoidance answer".
But of course by far the worst News outlet on TV is GB News, the only one which is obviously and blatantly politically biased, hence the several warnings and ticking off's by OFCOM.
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Jun 25, 2024 7:43:50 GMT
According to Witchy the Guardian is a little Quisling “ Russia’s military offensive against Ukraine is an act of aggression that will make already worrisome tensions between Nato and Moscow even more dangerous. The west’s new cold war with Russia has turned hot. Vladimir Putin bears primary responsibility for this latest development, but Nato’s arrogant, tone‐deaf policy toward Russia over the past quarter‐century deserves a large share as well. Analysts committed to a US foreign policy of realism and restraint have warned for more than a quarter‐century that continuing to expand the most powerful military alliance in history toward another major power would not end well. The war in Ukraine provides definitive confirmation that it did not.” www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/feb/28/nato-expansion-war-russia-ukraine?CMP=Share_iOSApp_OtherHeres another ”Among others, Biden’s CIA director, William J. Burns, has been warning about the provocative effect of NATO expansion on Russia since 1995. That’s when Burns, then a political officer in the U.S. Embassy in Moscow, reported to Washington that “hostility to early NATO expansion is almost universally felt across the domestic political spectrum here. Lost in the outrage over Russia’s invasion of Ukraine is the fact that many in the West have long warned that widespread NATO expansion into Eastern Europe coul… theconversation.com/ukraine-war-follows-decades-of-warnings-that-nato-expansion-into-eastern-europe-could-provoke-russia-177999And another “Chomsky believes that the main 'background' of this war, a factor that is missing in mainstream media coverage, is "NATO expansion." www.commondreams.org/views/2022/06/25/not-justification-provocation-chomsky-root-causes-russia-ukraine-warMore Quislings ( according to Witchy )from the Guardian . ”The current confrontation between Russia and the west is fuelled by many grievances, but the greatest is the belief in Moscow that the west tricked the former Soviet Union by breaking promises made at the end of the cold war in 1989-1990 that Nato would not expand to the east. In his now famous 2007 speech to the Munich Security Conference, Vladimir Putin accused the west of forgetting and breaking assurances, leaving international law in ruins.” www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jan/12/russias-belief-in-nato-betrayal-and-why-it-matters-today?CMP=Share_iOSApp_OtherThat should have Witchy running. Alas, it's been ignored and he's popped back in with more bollocks.
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Jun 25, 2024 7:59:28 GMT
This won't make the slightest bit of difference to all those mostly elderly knuckle draggers who revel in similar obnoxiousness themselves and cheer it. But outside such core appeal they will put more people off than persuade them. That such obnoxiousness works for people of a certain type though is being amply demonstrated already by this thread. By all the usual suspects. Jokesy will be along in a minute, and Bentley too, speaking shit to each other as if any of you actually matter. Jonksy is banned, do keep up, srb! Jonksy's banned! What for, what happened ?
|
|
|
Post by Hutchyns on Jun 25, 2024 8:24:46 GMT
witchfinder
In the early days of television, there was a lot of hand-wringing at the BBC as to whether the person reading the news could/should be shown on air. The concern was that even an accidental or most minor facial expression might indicate some approval or disapproval, and that at a time when the news was confined solely to the facts with no judgment, let allow opinion could be mingled or inserted into the news.
Of course things have moved on considerably, and with its methods of presentation, and the stories it promotes and those that it passes over, even the BBC leaves you in no doubt what opinion it is correct to hold on each and every subject covered ..... but as indicated, Sky and Channel 4 are still off the scale compared to anything the BBC does in allowing opinion and judgement to impinge upon factual news.
|
|
|
The BBC
Jun 25, 2024 8:25:31 GMT
via mobile
Post by andrewbrown on Jun 25, 2024 8:25:31 GMT
Jonksy is banned, do keep up, srb! Jonksy's banned! What for, what happened ? See Tincs comment on the locked George Galloway thread.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2024 8:29:32 GMT
Jonksy is banned, do keep up, srb! Jonksy's banned! What for, what happened ? I believe the left, with the help of Andrew and Vinny, collectively reported him to get him banned. These people are perfectly fine with Witchfinder practically celebrating the slaughter of Jewish kids during the Hamas terrorist attacks. A celebration that was in realtime.
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Jun 25, 2024 8:35:04 GMT
Jonksy's banned! What for, what happened ? See Tincs comment on the locked George Galloway thread. Talk about a massive overreaction. Outraged lefties wont be happy until free speech is completely banned.
|
|
|
The BBC
Jun 25, 2024 9:06:14 GMT
via mobile
Post by andrewbrown on Jun 25, 2024 9:06:14 GMT
Jonksy's banned! What for, what happened ? I believe the left, with the help of Andrew and Vinny, collectively reported him to get him banned. These people are perfectly fine with Witchfinder practically celebrating the slaughter of Jewish kids during the Hamas terrorist attacks. A celebration that was in realtime.
No he didn't That's a plain misrepresentative lie.
|
|
|
The BBC
Jun 25, 2024 9:07:04 GMT
via mobile
Post by andrewbrown on Jun 25, 2024 9:07:04 GMT
See Tincs comment on the locked George Galloway thread. Talk about a massive overreaction. Outraged lefties wont be happy until free speech is completely banned. Freedom of speech doesn't mean you can say anything.
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jun 25, 2024 9:16:58 GMT
Jonks just comes out and says it... unlike others who sneakingly go about it hoping no one will notice.
|
|
|
The BBC
Jun 25, 2024 10:14:48 GMT
via mobile
Post by andrewbrown on Jun 25, 2024 10:14:48 GMT
Jonks just comes out and says it... unlike others who sneakingly go about it hoping no one will notice. Saying that people deserved to die because they are Muslims is inexcusable. In spite of my differences with people on this board, I don't think anyone else actually thinks that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2024 10:29:22 GMT
I believe the left, with the help of Andrew and Vinny, collectively reported him to get him banned. These people are perfectly fine with Witchfinder practically celebrating the slaughter of Jewish kids during the Hamas terrorist attacks. A celebration that was in realtime.
No he didn't That's a plain misrepresentative lie. Yes he did. While the terrorist attacks was ongoing, when kids were being slaughtered by armed Hamas terrorists, he stated, in realtime (as it was happening), on his Sidfiddler account (multiaccount) that "they reap what they sow". I understand that you're perfectly fine with that, but I am not. They were just innocent civilians starting out in life. The fact that not a single self-righteous lefty had a problem with that demonstrates the problem, where immoral scum try and dictate morals to everyone else with their faux outrage. I agree that Jonksy's post was immoral, but I will not and never will be subdued by your extreme double standards.
|
|