|
|
Post by sheepy on Jun 18, 2024 7:37:41 GMT
Seems to me every time Hitler is mentioned against anything that might be political opposition, the Anarchists turn up and smash the place up.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Jun 18, 2024 7:51:04 GMT
If you're so concerned by this why do you still vote for an anti-Semitic party? I don't. You don't vote Labour?
Seems unlikely.
|
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Jun 18, 2024 9:47:02 GMT
As I implied earlier, I'm not here to be denigrated by Rightists. Earned or not, you may have been given a lot of respect in your last job, on here you are just a Right-wing fool. Says the pretend psychologist.  |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Jun 18, 2024 9:49:21 GMT
Thatcher, and all those Rightists who follow her hard line politics. Thousands of small businesses destroyed. People out of work almost hit 4Million. 3million children pushed into relative poverty which meant probably a million families living in relative poverty. Around a million people denied dole money because the government didn't recognise them as unemployed (just people with no job) because there were no jobs for them to apply for. Many Privatizations in order to secure 'money now' to support the extreme moves of the hard right Conservative government. Privatizations that are still costing the economy millions of pounds today. Two huge economic black holes where the NHS and state education used to be. Thatcher encouraged Private Health and forced some to go private in order to relieve their pain, whether they could afford it or not. Thatcher! Christ are you serious, so you're only going back to 1979 then, lol. Anyone who doesn't agree with C2s lefty politics of envy is hard right according to him |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Jun 18, 2024 9:52:45 GMT
Why would Blair have been bothered what happened to the NHS, he knew him and his family would never be using it, he's worth about £80 million + now, same as Starmer I bet you wont see him sitting in A&E along with his 'poor' voters. Both Blair and Starmer are capitalists that obviously care about the "many not the few" including caring for misguided Rightists like yourself. When Tory governments screw up the NHS I don't hear you complaining about the reality that they wont be sitting in the A&E for hours along with their misguided voters. --- As is happening right now. Starmer has a just for him , specially arranged by law pension scheme Just for him and no one else Thats for the few , not for the many |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Jun 18, 2024 9:54:46 GMT
I think I've wasted enough of my time on your juvenile ramblings.
Only time you've ''wasted'' is on trying to avoid the simple question I asked . I''l rephrase the question . How does Sir Keir Starmer's just for him and no-one else personally named special pension law fit in with your recorded statement of purported fact that a Labour government will bring people together and stop ''them and us'' Surely it's a prime example of ''for the few , not the many''? I have already pointed out that Starmer's pension was normal procedure when leaving the post he had held. i.e. not a contrived situation to specially favour Starmer. Your question is an inappropriate contrived creation of your own. Contrived - just for him personally His name is stated on the title of the statutory instrument itself |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jun 18, 2024 10:00:33 GMT
You don't vote Labour?
Seems unlikely.
There's nothing worse than a closet lefty dumfuck. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jun 18, 2024 15:26:56 GMT
You don't vote Labour?
Seems unlikely.
I don't vote for an anti-Semitic party, and I'm not playing your typically childish Rightist game. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jun 18, 2024 15:29:25 GMT
You don't vote Labour?
Seems unlikely.
There's nothing worse than a closet lefty dumfuck. Whoever they are they probably hang about with your matey Rightist dumbfuckers  |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jun 18, 2024 15:31:11 GMT
I have already pointed out that Starmer's pension was normal procedure when leaving the post he had held. i.e. not a contrived situation to specially favour Starmer. Your question is an inappropriate contrived creation of your own. Contrived - just for him personally His name is stated on the title of the statutory instrument itself It is recognised as 'Normal Practice'. Otherwise provide the actual proof that it wasn't. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Jun 18, 2024 16:11:52 GMT
Why do you post psychobabble? Why are you showing your ignorance again? You’re the one posting the psycho babble , not me. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2024 16:36:28 GMT
This is a very shit attention seeking troll thread even by this forum's standards.
|
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Jun 18, 2024 16:42:00 GMT
Contrived - just for him personally His name is stated on the title of the statutory instrument itself It is recognised as 'Normal Practice'. Otherwise provide the actual proof that it wasn't. Are you really innately as stupid as your posts make you look or do you have to work at it? Your demanded proof has already been provided but just for you please list precisely if anymore than one single person benefits from the statutory instrument (law) entitled: The Pensions Increase (Pension Scheme for Keir Starmer QC) Regulations 2013Sir Keir Starmer - for the few , not the many |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jun 19, 2024 5:31:58 GMT
Thatcher! Christ are you serious, so you're only going back to 1979 then, lol. Anyone who doesn't agree with C2s lefty politics of envy is hard right according to him A silly childish lie ^^^ |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jun 19, 2024 5:37:21 GMT
It is recognised as 'Normal Practice'. Otherwise provide the actual proof that it wasn't. Are you really innately as stupid as your posts make you look or do you have to work at it? Your demanded proof has already been provided but just for you please list precisely if anymore than one single person benefits from the statutory instrument (law) entitled: The Pensions Increase (Pension Scheme for Keir Starmer QC) Regulations 2013 Sir Keir Starmer - for the few , not the many Your problem is you can't recognise Tory propaganda shite when you see it. Which makes you look innately stupid. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65037136 |
|
