|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 20, 2024 5:22:18 GMT
We do - inchoate offences like attempts and conspiracies, breaches of H&S legislation, etc.
More pertinently, do you suggest the medical profession should ignore the conduct of a member which was reckless with regard to the safety of others.
I am not even remotely convinced her actions were such. The ruling handed down has a lot more to do with the politics of making lawful protest almost impossible to achieve, leaving protestors no route but to break the law, than it does with the alleged risk of the actions of the protestors. All The Best When has JSO ever made a lawful protest? |
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Apr 20, 2024 6:58:33 GMT
So that makes all Doctors guilty does it? Well, in that case: LINK let's sack every CEO and add them to the Sex Offender Register. All The Best No, but you are the one saying that completing a course as one makes you immune from prosecution or the consequences of your actions If completing the course confers immunity, why not allow same to scum like Anjem Choudhury who started one then pissed his medical career up the wall in a drunken haze. |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Apr 20, 2024 7:17:58 GMT
Did I post that? Would you be happy to see her as your GP? Would you trust her? Issue with lefties like you is that you post one thing ( don't strike her off she's ''special'' because she's a doctor) and when the idiocy of your position is pointed out (another 'special' doctor bombed an airport) come over with a touch of the vapours and all unnecessary. Oh, I am not the one who exemplified idiocy by posting a story about an entirely different doctor, carrying out an entirely different crime, in an entirely different city to justify striking off a GP who has done nothing to harm anyone other voice an opinion some other idiots don't like. That was YOUI'd be perfectly happy to have Dr Susan Benn as my GP, she hasn't hurt anyone (except the feelings of those special snowflakes who don't like hearing opinion they can't understand), Dr Abdullah on the other hand has sought to harm people, so I would not be happy to have him as my GP. All The Best You are the one suggesting that someone who takes a medical degree at university should be immune from the consequences of their illegal actions because they are ''special''. Does your definition of ''specialness' extend to those with degrees like dentists, vets , teachers, paramedics? What about other useful people (but maybe no degrees ) like dustmen , electricians, plumbers etc? - why are they also not ''special''and iyo also immune from the consequences of their illegalities? Your posturing makes no sense |
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Apr 20, 2024 7:27:57 GMT
I'd be perfectly happy to have Dr Susan Benn as my GP, she hasn't hurt anyone (except the feelings of those special snowflakes who don't like hearing opinion they can't understand), Dr Abdullah on the other hand has sought to harm people, so I would not be happy to have him as my GP. All The Best No, she hasn't hurt anyone, but she was part of a group that took some pretty foolhardy risks which might have resulted in serious injury or death. I can't see how the profession can ignore that. This is a link to an application to have the injunction discharged which details the risks and some of the behaviour. Interesting reading The terminal is one of several facilities accorded special protection after Blair was found in a state of total unpreparedness fir the fuel protests of 2001 I’m surprised they didn’t set the SAS on them |
|
|
|
Post by ProVeritas on Apr 20, 2024 7:37:41 GMT
I am not even remotely convinced her actions were such. The ruling handed down has a lot more to do with the politics of making lawful protest almost impossible to achieve, leaving protestors no route but to break the law, than it does with the alleged risk of the actions of the protestors. All The Best It's a point of view.
How about, do you suggest the medical profession should ignore the conduct of a member which is alleged to have been reckless with regard to the safety of others? It would entirely depend on how real any alleged risk caused by any alleged recklessness was. One size fits all laws almost never work. All The Best |
|
|
|
Post by Dogburger on Apr 20, 2024 7:38:32 GMT
Digressing slightly but still on JSO dickheads... Just Stop Oil protesters found guilty of aggravated trespass and criminal damageFive Just Stop Oil protesters have been convicted of aggravated trespass after they disrupted a performance of Les Miserables in London’s West End last year. Two of them were also found guilty of criminal damage. The estimated cost to the theatre of cancelling the performance was £60,000. The left wing anarchists pleaded not guilty, however Hannah Taylor, 23, Lydia Gribbin, 28, Hanan Ameur, 22, Noah Crane, 18, and Poppy Bliss, 19, were found guilty of aggravated trespass and will be sentenced at a later date. www.irishnews.com/news/uk/just-stop-oil-protesters-found-guilty-of-aggravated-trespass-at-west-end-show-PG52FVJYL5ICVKH5B27Y6SNORM/I sincerely hope these five privileged pampered entitled lefties get a minimum six months in Wormwood Scrubs. 6 years would be better but regardless the GP wont be able to practice from a cell |
|
|
|
Post by Equivocal on Apr 25, 2024 5:52:50 GMT
A few points:-
Dr Benn has not been a practising medic for around two years.
Dr Benn self reported all of the issues
Dr Benn had earlier criminal convictions which the Trbunal did not consider worthy of sanction.
The Tribunal only considered the risk from diverting public services, not the dangerous activity of other protestors.
Dr Benn has further criminal cases in the pipeline (no pun intended).
The result was 5 months suspension - to reflect.
Dr Benn stated she won't be changing her behaviour.
My conclusion:- a pointless exercise, but good publicity from JSO's perspective.
|
|
