|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Apr 8, 2024 13:46:49 GMT
Yes I watched a discussion about this earlier on GB News. And people talk about integration and multiculturalism, Ha. Muslims do not integrate, regardless of country Islam is not compatible with anything, other than Islam. They hate us with a passion Red, unless you are Islam to them your life is meaningless, hence the reason they will NEVER integrate with non-Islams, they one and only true goal is to rule the country they dwell in, they will not rest until the UK is under Sharia law, and non-Islamic religions will be put to death. In 2009 a report from Civitas said there were no fewar than 85 'sharia' courts in this country. It would seem, when it comes to Islam, British law is not good enough. And I have every confidence that outraged lefties will scream racist at anyone who dares to raise so much as a quizzical eyebrow. |
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Apr 8, 2024 14:08:23 GMT
Oh stop being such a drama queen it does not become you, which bit of people are on trial for murder attempted murder, GBH with intent week in week out year in year out, Who is being a drama queen FFS handy? You always leep to our fucking useless plods defence FFS.. When they screw up, or bent I most certainly don't, at least I know how they have to work, how they deal with people, and what rules they have to adhere to 24/7 |
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Apr 8, 2024 14:13:22 GMT
They hate us with a passion Red, unless you are Islam to them your life is meaningless, hence the reason they will NEVER integrate with non-Islams, they one and only true goal is to rule the country they dwell in, they will not rest until the UK is under Sharia law, and non-Islamic religions will be put to death. In 2009 a report from Civitas said there were no fewar than 85 'sharia' courts in this country. It would seem, when it comes to Islam, British law is not good enough. And I have every confidence that outraged lefties will scream racist at anyone who dares to raise so much as a quizzical eyebrow. Are there 'Sharia courts' in Britain? While there are undoubtedly lots of different councils and tribunals dealing with Sharia principles, they aren't courts of law. Most are Sharia 'councils' set up to make decisions on purely religious matters, although there are some bodies that mix Sharia principles with legally binding arbitration. But none can overrule the regular courts. Sharia councils Getting married for the purposes of your religion doesn't necessarily mean you are married in the eyes of the state. Equally, the paperwork required for a civil divorce needn't be recognised by your religion. For this reason, many Sharia councils exist to issue Islamic divorce certificates, and give advice on other aspects of religious law. They're often attached to mosques. Family law and Sharia Other services related to family issues might be offered by a Sharia council. Family mediation is one example. Some campaigners worry about using mediation by religious bodies to work out agreements about children and finances after a marriage breaks down. In 2014 Baroness Cox, a member of the House of Lords, tried to introduce a law to ensure that women aren't disadvantaged in mediation by religious bodies, and make clear that they aren't a court. But, formally, this is already the case. While feuding couples have to at least consider mediation before going to court, it doesn't override family law. A court has to sign off on any agreement made after divorce for it to be legally binding, and won't do so if the judge thinks it's unfair. In 2013, the High Court was asked by an Orthodox Jewish couple to accept the ruling of a Jewish religious court on post-divorce family arrangements. The judge said that while the agreement would carry weight, it would be non-binding—neither party could get around English law by agreeing to abide by the decision of another tribunal. Rather than open the door to "Sharia divorces", as some newspapers reported, the judgment confirmed that agreements made in a religious form are ultimately subject to English law. Sharia arbitration bodies The way Sharia might become legally enforceable is where a Sharia organisation is used for arbitration. This means taking a commercial or personal dispute to a neutral forum and agreeing to be bound by what it decides. It's up to the people having the dispute who they agree to be the arbiter, and they can even choose to apply rules other than English law to the affair—so long as there is no conflict between the two. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Apr 8, 2024 14:24:40 GMT
In 2009 a report from Civitas said there were no fewar than 85 'sharia' courts in this country. It would seem, when it comes to Islam, British law is not good enough. And I have every confidence that outraged lefties will scream racist at anyone who dares to raise so much as a quizzical eyebrow. Are there 'Sharia courts' in Britain? While there are undoubtedly lots of different councils and tribunals dealing with Sharia principles, they aren't courts of law. Most are Sharia 'councils' set up to make decisions on purely religious matters, although there are some bodies that mix Sharia principles with legally binding arbitration. But none can overrule the regular courts. Sharia councils Getting married for the purposes of your religion doesn't necessarily mean you are married in the eyes of the state. Equally, the paperwork required for a civil divorce needn't be recognised by your religion. For this reason, many Sharia councils exist to issue Islamic divorce certificates, and give advice on other aspects of religious law. They're often attached to mosques. Family law and Sharia Other services related to family issues might be offered by a Sharia council. Family mediation is one example. Some campaigners worry about using mediation by religious bodies to work out agreements about children and finances after a marriage breaks down. In 2014 Baroness Cox, a member of the House of Lords, tried to introduce a law to ensure that women aren't disadvantaged in mediation by religious bodies, and make clear that they aren't a court. But, formally, this is already the case. While feuding couples have to at least consider mediation before going to court, it doesn't override family law. A court has to sign off on any agreement made after divorce for it to be legally binding, and won't do so if the judge thinks it's unfair. In 2013, the High Court was asked by an Orthodox Jewish couple to accept the ruling of a Jewish religious court on post-divorce family arrangements. The judge said that while the agreement would carry weight, it would be non-binding—neither party could get around English law by agreeing to abide by the decision of another tribunal. Rather than open the door to "Sharia divorces", as some newspapers reported, the judgment confirmed that agreements made in a religious form are ultimately subject to English law. Sharia arbitration bodies The way Sharia might become legally enforceable is where a Sharia organisation is used for arbitration. This means taking a commercial or personal dispute to a neutral forum and agreeing to be bound by what it decides. It's up to the people having the dispute who they agree to be the arbiter, and they can even choose to apply rules other than English law to the affair—so long as there is no conflict between the two. H, officially sharia courts are not courts of law. However for Muslims in this non Islamic country, they 'unofficially' most certainly are official. The government tend to look the other way to avoid accusations of 'islamophobia'. It's a bit like bigamy which is illegal in this country, unless you're a Muslim. Muslims don't integrate they aren't even encouraged to integrate, they live by their own rules. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 8, 2024 14:54:24 GMT
Who is being a drama queen FFS handy? You always leep to our fucking useless plods defence FFS.. When they screw up, or bent I most certainly don't, at least I know how they have to work, how they deal with people, and what rules they have to adhere to 24/7 And when they do the job they are paid todo I am the first one to praise them.....I know the authorities take the piss by expecting them to look after those who have mental illness etc.. |
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Apr 8, 2024 15:16:23 GMT
Are there 'Sharia courts' in Britain? While there are undoubtedly lots of different councils and tribunals dealing with Sharia principles, they aren't courts of law. Most are Sharia 'councils' set up to make decisions on purely religious matters, although there are some bodies that mix Sharia principles with legally binding arbitration. But none can overrule the regular courts. Sharia councils Getting married for the purposes of your religion doesn't necessarily mean you are married in the eyes of the state. Equally, the paperwork required for a civil divorce needn't be recognised by your religion. For this reason, many Sharia councils exist to issue Islamic divorce certificates, and give advice on other aspects of religious law. They're often attached to mosques. Family law and Sharia Other services related to family issues might be offered by a Sharia council. Family mediation is one example. Some campaigners worry about using mediation by religious bodies to work out agreements about children and finances after a marriage breaks down. In 2014 Baroness Cox, a member of the House of Lords, tried to introduce a law to ensure that women aren't disadvantaged in mediation by religious bodies, and make clear that they aren't a court. But, formally, this is already the case. While feuding couples have to at least consider mediation before going to court, it doesn't override family law. A court has to sign off on any agreement made after divorce for it to be legally binding, and won't do so if the judge thinks it's unfair. In 2013, the High Court was asked by an Orthodox Jewish couple to accept the ruling of a Jewish religious court on post-divorce family arrangements. The judge said that while the agreement would carry weight, it would be non-binding—neither party could get around English law by agreeing to abide by the decision of another tribunal. Rather than open the door to "Sharia divorces", as some newspapers reported, the judgment confirmed that agreements made in a religious form are ultimately subject to English law. Sharia arbitration bodies The way Sharia might become legally enforceable is where a Sharia organisation is used for arbitration. This means taking a commercial or personal dispute to a neutral forum and agreeing to be bound by what it decides. It's up to the people having the dispute who they agree to be the arbiter, and they can even choose to apply rules other than English law to the affair—so long as there is no conflict between the two. H, officially sharia courts are not courts of law. However for Muslims in this non Islamic country, they 'unofficially' most certainly are official. The government tend to look the other way to avoid accusations of 'islamophobia'. It's a bit like bigamy which is illegal in this country, unless you're a Muslim. Muslims don't integrate they aren't even encouraged to integrate, they live by their own rules. I agree some of them will never integrate at all, the ones I know and have worked with have |
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Apr 8, 2024 15:19:27 GMT
This is really nasty
A father and son who murdered and mutilated two men with a blowtorch and forced nails into the eyes of one of their victims have been jailed for at least 34 years.
Fullscreen button
Ian MacLeod, 66, and Dean MacLeod, 42, killed Derek Johnston, 37, and Desmond Rowlings, 66, at a flat in Edinburgh in 2022.
The city's high court was told that a hammer was left embedded in Mr Johnston's head and the letters "YLT" were burned into his forehead with a blowtorch.
The killers severed one of his ears and part of his nose and forced nails into his eyes.
Mr Johnston suffered at least 28 separate injuries to his head, neck and limbs.
His body was found in the bath covered with a rug.
Mr Rowlings also had "VT", "YT" and "YLT" burned onto his body. The killers severed parts of his nose and upper lip and cut off his ears.
Mr Rowlings had 136 distinct injuries to his head, neck, chest, back and limbs. The court was told some of these were groups of injuries so the total number inflicted was considerably greater.
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Apr 8, 2024 23:28:22 GMT
This is really nasty A father and son who murdered and mutilated two men with a blowtorch and forced nails into the eyes of one of their victims have been jailed for at least 34 years. Fullscreen button Ian MacLeod, 66, and Dean MacLeod, 42, killed Derek Johnston, 37, and Desmond Rowlings, 66, at a flat in Edinburgh in 2022. The city's high court was told that a hammer was left embedded in Mr Johnston's head and the letters "YLT" were burned into his forehead with a blowtorch. The killers severed one of his ears and part of his nose and forced nails into his eyes. Mr Johnston suffered at least 28 separate injuries to his head, neck and limbs. His body was found in the bath covered with a rug. Mr Rowlings also had "VT", "YT" and "YLT" burned onto his body. The killers severed parts of his nose and upper lip and cut off his ears. Mr Rowlings had 136 distinct injuries to his head, neck, chest, back and limbs. The court was told some of these were groups of injuries so the total number inflicted was considerably greater. God almighty, that is truly awful. And weak lefties who have never seen anything will insist they should not be executed. Soft on crime means crime gets worse, we reap what we sow. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 9, 2024 3:33:29 GMT
This is really nasty A father and son who murdered and mutilated two men with a blowtorch and forced nails into the eyes of one of their victims have been jailed for at least 34 years. Fullscreen button Ian MacLeod, 66, and Dean MacLeod, 42, killed Derek Johnston, 37, and Desmond Rowlings, 66, at a flat in Edinburgh in 2022. The city's high court was told that a hammer was left embedded in Mr Johnston's head and the letters "YLT" were burned into his forehead with a blowtorch. The killers severed one of his ears and part of his nose and forced nails into his eyes. Mr Johnston suffered at least 28 separate injuries to his head, neck and limbs. His body was found in the bath covered with a rug. Mr Rowlings also had "VT", "YT" and "YLT" burned onto his body. The killers severed parts of his nose and upper lip and cut off his ears. Mr Rowlings had 136 distinct injuries to his head, neck, chest, back and limbs. The court was told some of these were groups of injuries so the total number inflicted was considerably greater. God almighty, that is truly awful. And weak lefties who have never seen anything will insist they should not be executed. Soft on crime means crime gets worse, we reap what we sow. Shocking footage shows 'bleeding' police officers wrestle to restrain 'machete-wielding' man on a South Londonistan street as frightened families look on......,We can all see what colour this arsehole is regardless of upsetting the usual woke lefty snowflake virtual signallers...
|
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Apr 9, 2024 5:43:26 GMT
Masum is accused of making the threats against Ms Akter the day after he allegedly attacked her in November last year. He was given bail ahead of a trial later to be held in September. He was also barred from having any contact with her. He pleaded not guilty to the charges.
|
|
|
|
Post by Hutchyns on Apr 9, 2024 6:36:38 GMT
Masum is accused of making the threats against Ms Akter the day after he allegedly attacked her in November last year. He was given bail ahead of a trial later to be held in September. He was also barred from having any contact with her. He pleaded not guilty to the charges. Once he explained he had a holiday to Barcelona already booked and paid for, 'bail' despite the death threats, was always going to be the outcome.  |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Apr 9, 2024 7:21:48 GMT
Masum is accused of making the threats against Ms Akter the day after he allegedly attacked her in November last year. He was given bail ahead of a trial later to be held in September. He was also barred from having any contact with her. He pleaded not guilty to the charges. So we were right in the first instance a 'mugshot' and he was known to police, they've referred themselves to the police complaints authority, little comfort for the dead woman and her young children. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Apr 9, 2024 9:01:44 GMT
Looks like they've found him in Aylesbury. Hope he has a fair trial and then gets locked up never to be released.
|
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Apr 9, 2024 9:09:37 GMT
Masum is accused of making the threats against Ms Akter the day after he allegedly attacked her in November last year. He was given bail ahead of a trial later to be held in September. He was also barred from having any contact with her. He pleaded not guilty to the charges. So we were right in the first instance a 'mugshot' and he was known to police, they've referred themselves to the police complaints authority, little comfort for the dead woman and her young children. Yes you were correct, the Police have quite rightly referred themselves to the Police Complaints Authority due to the fact they had recent contact with the victim it is normal practise as far as I am aware |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Apr 9, 2024 9:13:11 GMT
Looks like they've found him in Aylesbury. Hope he has a fair trial and then gets locked up never to be released. On the contrary, it will be unfair to the victim, her children and family, because they'll have to be put through the ordeal of listening to this whinging whining scum telling the Courts how hard his life has been for him, why we should all feel sorry for him and not the victim and her family, working in Primark was not what he expect from the UK, he wanted a big house, fast cars, plenty of money and young girls galore, and the system has failed him, let him down, it's our fault ..blah blah blah blah .. same fuckin bullshit crap. |
|
