|
|
Post by dodgydave on Apr 4, 2024 13:26:36 GMT
If there is M.A.D and you survive there will be no streaming. I wouldn't worry about it. Even if you survive the first strikes, you won't survive the nuclear winter. Literally billions will die within the first year. The only people that will survive are people living in very remote areas, who already have good survival skills... and maybe a handful of billionaires would have built secret bunkers in the middle of nowhere. Even Presidents hiding in secret bunkers would have a tough time, once the diesel runs out they would have to move to another bunker... and eventually they will run out of bunkers. |
|
|
|
Post by bancroft on Apr 4, 2024 17:44:01 GMT
If there is M.A.D and you survive there will be no streaming. I wouldn't worry about it. Even if you survive the first strikes, you won't survive the nuclear winter. Literally billions will die within the first year. The only people that will survive are people living in very remote areas, who already have good survival skills... and maybe a handful of billionaires would have built secret bunkers in the middle of nowhere. Even Presidents hiding in secret bunkers would have a tough time, once the diesel runs out they would have to move to another bunker... and eventually they will run out of bunkers. Agree on remoteness and the nuclear winter yet on the latter and living on a windy island with winds difficult to know how damaging that would be. Radiation poisoning would kill most. |
|
|
|
Post by dodgydave on Apr 5, 2024 1:28:52 GMT
I wouldn't worry about it. Even if you survive the first strikes, you won't survive the nuclear winter. Literally billions will die within the first year. The only people that will survive are people living in very remote areas, who already have good survival skills... and maybe a handful of billionaires would have built secret bunkers in the middle of nowhere. Even Presidents hiding in secret bunkers would have a tough time, once the diesel runs out they would have to move to another bunker... and eventually they will run out of bunkers. Agree on remoteness and the nuclear winter yet on the latter and living on a windy island with winds difficult to know how damaging that would be. Radiation poisoning would kill most. No, starvation would kill the most. If America and Russia launch at each other it is estimated that 5 billion would die within 2 years, most through starvation as crops fail due to the amount of soot in the atmosphere (cause by the firestorms). |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 5, 2024 5:42:52 GMT
I wouldn't worry about it. Even if you survive the first strikes, you won't survive the nuclear winter. Literally billions will die within the first year. The only people that will survive are people living in very remote areas, who already have good survival skills... and maybe a handful of billionaires would have built secret bunkers in the middle of nowhere. Even Presidents hiding in secret bunkers would have a tough time, once the diesel runs out they would have to move to another bunker... and eventually they will run out of bunkers.
Radiation poisoning would kill most.Hiroshima and Nagasaki are thriving cities today no radiation and a huge population. Not so in Chernobyl tho it all depends on geographics... |
|
|
|
Post by dodgydave on Apr 5, 2024 13:11:09 GMT
Agree on remoteness and the nuclear winter yet on the latter and living on a windy island with winds difficult to know how damaging that would be.
Radiation poisoning would kill most. Hiroshima and Nagasaki are thriving cities today no radiation and a huge population. Not so in Chernobyl tho it all depends on geographics... Those were atom (fission) bombs exploded at a random altitude, which luckily for them was too high, so much of the radiation drifted away. Modern nukes are hydrogen bombs (exploding a fission bomb to create fusion). The shock wave, blast, heat and radiation produced covers a far bigger range. They have also done thousands of test to establish the perfect altitude to cause the most destruction. I've seen a prediction of what would happen if India and Pakistan fired their nukes at each other. Crops all over the world would be 20-40% down for a decade and 2 billion people would die within 2 years... and that is just from 100 nukes! |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 5, 2024 14:05:24 GMT
Hiroshima and Nagasaki are thriving cities today no radiation and a huge population. Not so in Chernobyl tho it all depends on geographics... which luckily for them was too high, so much of the radiation drifted away. Modern nukes are hydrogen bombs (exploding a fission bomb to create fusion). The shock wave, blast, heat and radiation produced covers a far bigger range. They have also done thousands of test to establish the perfect altitude to cause the most destruction. I've seen a prediction of what would happen if India and Pakistan fired their nukes at each other. Crops all over the world would be 20-40% down for a decade and 2 billion people would die within 2 years... and that is just from 100 nukes! It doesn't mater what type of fission is used. Radiation is Radiation. Chernobyl is a no-go area whereas long Island is not. Bikini Island is still an atomic wasteland and so is the Enewalk Atoll.....The Bravo test wasn’t the first H-bomb that the US. detonated—that distinction belonged to Ivy Mike, a device exploded in November 1952 in the Enewak Atoll in the Marshall Islands......But it was the first thermonuclear weapon that was small enough to be utilized as a weapon. While its designers had achieved a technological first, they also made a critical mistake, by drastically underestimating the size of the yield that would be created by its fusion fuel. |
|
|
|
Post by bancroft on Apr 5, 2024 17:20:37 GMT
Agree on remoteness and the nuclear winter yet on the latter and living on a windy island with winds difficult to know how damaging that would be. Radiation poisoning would kill most. No, starvation would kill the most. If America and Russia launch at each other it is estimated that 5 billion would die within 2 years, most through starvation as crops fail due to the amount of soot in the atmosphere (cause by the firestorms). I doubt that because people would desert their posts at nuclear power stations and so you would get melt-downs impacting many more. |
|
|
|
Post by distant on Apr 5, 2024 18:51:39 GMT
Or have you bought into the streaming 'revolution'?
I've never signed up for a streaming service, I don't like signing up for anything on the internet. |
|
