|
Post by morayloon on Nov 20, 2022 16:14:19 GMT
Wednesday 23rd November will be a fateful day for Scotland. The Supreme Court will announce its judgement on whether or not ScotGov can run a Referendum. Five men will decide the relationship that Scotland has with the UK. Is it one of equality between the nations, where one nation can freely leave if it wants to? Or, is it one of subservience to English rule? One in which we are trapped with no avenue to leave the Union! If the latter, will it increase support for Independence? One can only hope that is the reaction to such a ruling.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Nov 21, 2022 10:27:26 GMT
Wednesday 23rd November will be a fateful day for Scotland. The Supreme Court will announce its judgement on whether or not ScotGov can run a Referendum. Five men will decide the relationship that Scotland has with the UK. Is it one of equality between the nations, where one nation can freely leave if it wants to? Or, is it one of subservience to English rule? One in which we are trapped with no avenue to leave the Union! If the latter, will it increase support for Independence? One can only hope that is the reaction to such a ruling. Well you can only freely leave if you get permission from 5 guys in London...
|
|
|
Post by om15 on Nov 21, 2022 14:39:35 GMT
But it didn't want to.
It voted to remain part of the UK, this inconvenient but crucial fact is being continually overlooked by the vocal minority that are still boring us with their dreams of a tartan utopia free of the bastard English and safe in the arms of Brussels, dream on, the Jocks don't want it.
|
|
|
Post by borchester on Nov 21, 2022 14:56:32 GMT
Wednesday 23rd November will be a fateful day for Scotland. The Supreme Court will announce its judgement on whether or not ScotGov can run a Referendum. Five men will decide the relationship that Scotland has with the UK. Is it one of equality between the nations, where one nation can freely leave if it wants to? Or, is it one of subservience to English rule? One in which we are trapped with no avenue to leave the Union! If the latter, will it increase support for Independence? One can only hope that is the reaction to such a ruling. Well, let us hope that Wee Krankie does not use this as an excuse to bottle out.
It does not matter what happens in London. If the Scottish government decides to call Indy2 then it is unlikely that the Lobster backs will be sent up north to return the Scots to their true loyalty.But the results of the referendum look uncertain and the poison dwarf can't afford to lose another one so she may use the Supreme Court judgement to call the whole thing off.
|
|
|
Post by jaydee on Nov 22, 2022 10:50:59 GMT
Wednesday 23rd November will be a fateful day for Scotland. The Supreme Court will announce its judgement on whether or not ScotGov can run a Referendum. Five men will decide the relationship that Scotland has with the UK. Is it one of equality between the nations, where one nation can freely leave if it wants to? Or, is it one of subservience to English rule? One in which we are trapped with no avenue to leave the Union! If the latter, will it increase support for Independence? One can only hope that is the reaction to such a ruling. Well, let us hope that Wee Krankie does not use this as an excuse to bottle out.
It does not matter what happens in London. If the Scottish government decides to call Indy2 then it is unlikely that the Lobster backs will be sent up north to return the Scots to their true loyalty.But the results of the referendum look uncertain and the poison dwarf can't afford to lose another one so she may use the Supreme Court judgement to call the whole thing off.
Howe does it not matter what happens in London. And how will the First Minister may use the judgement to call the whole thing of. As a Johnston apologist how do you work that one out. Or are the eyes still glazed. Your problem being with a indy ref. Apart from the fact that when Scotland does go its merry way. Bankrupt England will have to borrow a further £100 billion at a minimum just to stand still.
|
|
|
Post by borchester on Nov 22, 2022 10:56:58 GMT
Well, let us hope that Wee Krankie does not use this as an excuse to bottle out.
It does not matter what happens in London. If the Scottish government decides to call Indy2 then it is unlikely that the Lobster backs will be sent up north to return the Scots to their true loyalty.But the results of the referendum look uncertain and the poison dwarf can't afford to lose another one so she may use the Supreme Court judgement to call the whole thing off.
Howe does it not matter what happens in London. And how will the First Minister may use the judgement to call the whole thing of. As a Johnston apologist how do you work that one out. Or are the eyes still glazed. Your problem being with a indy ref. Apart from the fact that when Scotland does go its merry way. Bankrupt England will have to borrow a further £100 billion at a minimum just to stand still. Here we go.
Jaydee is already parroting the official SNP line and is laying the groundwork for the cancellation of Indy2
|
|
|
Post by jaydee on Nov 22, 2022 11:02:24 GMT
But it didn't want to. It voted to remain part of the UK, this inconvenient but crucial fact is being continually overlooked by the vocal minority that are still boring us with their dreams of a tartan utopia free of the bastard English and safe in the arms of Brussels, dream on, the Jocks don't want it. The continual inconvenient fact was provided there was no material change in circumstances. But let me make it easy for you. There are a million and one reasons why Scotland should remain part of the UK. Your ilk or the economy is not one of them. Or is it two. So perhaps you could answer a inconvenient fact, which in your case has been a 100% failure. What economic benefit would Scotland gain remaining part of the UK. It is a very simple question. Which silly Englishmen seem to have a problem with. You do understand that the policy of the SNP is to leave the UK. That means it does not want to leave England. And you still have not explained what is the reason of your continual hate filled drivel about the Scots that affects your sad life. Its eating you up.
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Nov 22, 2022 11:04:28 GMT
Scotland does not want to leave the UK.
It already voted.
|
|
|
Post by jaydee on Nov 22, 2022 11:07:16 GMT
How does it not matter what happens in London. And how will the First Minister may use the judgement to call the whole thing of. As a Johnston apologist how do you work that one out. Or are the eyes still glazed. Your problem being with a indy ref. Apart from the fact that when Scotland does go its merry way. Bankrupt England will have to borrow a further £100 billion at a minimum just to stand still. Here we go.
Jaydee is already parroting the official SNP line and is laying the groundwork for the cancellation of Indy2
Ah the glazed eyed one line wonder is still looking for brownie points. So let me ask you again. Second time. How does it not matter what happens in London. And how will the First Minister may use the judgement to call the whole thing of. That is what you said. And what part of what you said do you not understand. Now explain. How is the FM preparing the cancellation of indy2. That the cretin Britnat fascist in Westminster are terrified of happening.
|
|
|
Post by borchester on Nov 22, 2022 11:16:18 GMT
Scotland does not want to leave the UK. It already voted. Sassenach lies!
And if you don't believe me ask Morayloon and Jaydee.
I would like to ask Thomas because although he is as big a Scots Nat nut as anyone else, he has a sense of humour as well. But sadly Tommy appears to have lost interest in this board.
|
|
|
Post by jaydee on Nov 22, 2022 11:37:36 GMT
Scotland does not want to leave the UK. It already voted. Sassenach lies!
And if you don't believe me ask Morayloon and Jaydee.
I would like to ask Thomas because although he is as big a Scots Nat nut as anyone else, he has a sense of humour as well. But sadly Tommy appears to have lost interest in this board.
Are you having a glazed eye hissy fit or just incapable of backing up your garbage. Or answering questions. So let me ask you again. How does it not matter what happens in London. And how will the First Minister may use the judgement to call the whole thing of.. Then explain how the FM is preparing the cancellation of indy2. That is what you said. And matey you misunderstand as silly Englishmen do. The purpose of the result of the Supreme court. It is being asked if a Indy ref will have lawful meaning, as it is a so called retained matter. It does not mean the Scottish government cannot call a indyref. The Scottish government can call as many referendums at it likes. That is a devolved matter. In short the so called legal or illegal decision is neither here nor there. The Scottish government will call a indy rfef on the date announced. It does not matter one monkeys fart if it is legal or illegal. It is the result that will count. And that matey cannot be ignored. Or if not on that date. The SNP will make it a defacto vote on the next election. So stop ranting Johnston apologist rubbish, who nobody in Scotland voted for. Or interested in your glazed eyed version. Why would you want to ask anybody anything. You have promoted yourself to the position of a self deluded Englishmen, being a self proclaimed expert on Scottish matters. .
|
|
|
Post by om15 on Nov 22, 2022 11:56:02 GMT
The Voice from the Bins. The Buckie seems to be flowing well this morning.
|
|
|
Post by jaydee on Nov 22, 2022 12:04:01 GMT
The Voice from the Bins. The Buckie seems to be flowing well this morning. Oh dear as desperation kicks in. You been in contact with a certain hate filled despicable clown. You missed out drugs and anti English. Can you tell me your reason for coming on the Scottish forum. And point out where I said the English drink raw sewage. That is the latest lie you spewed.
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Nov 23, 2022 17:57:15 GMT
Wednesday 23rd November will be a fateful day for Scotland. The Supreme Court will announce its judgement on whether or not ScotGov can run a Referendum. Five men will decide the relationship that Scotland has with the UK. Is it one of equality between the nations, where one nation can freely leave if it wants to? Or, is it one of subservience to English rule? One in which we are trapped with no avenue to leave the Union! If the latter, will it increase support for Independence? One can only hope that is the reaction to such a ruling. Well you can only freely leave if you get permission from 5 guys in London... It’s been a while but did the SNP or did they not vote for Blair’s destruction of the United Kingdom bill ? The one that explicitly gave powers to call referenda on constitutional matters not to the upstart separatist chambers but with the mother of parliaments. And did they or did they not campaign on the basis the 2014 vote was a once in a generation opportunity, which received a vote to stay part of the union. If the SNP didn’t like the devolution bill maybe they should have voted it down ….
|
|
|
Post by jaydee on Nov 23, 2022 18:27:11 GMT
Well you can only freely leave if you get permission from 5 guys in London... It’s been a while but did the SNP or did they not vote for Blair’s destruction of the United Kingdom bill ? The one that explicitly gave powers to call referenda on constitutional matters not to the upstart separatist chambers but with the mother of parliaments. And did they or did they not campaign on the basis the 2014 vote was a once in a generation opportunity, which received a vote to stay part of the union. If the SNP didn’t like the devolution bill maybe they should have voted it down …. The destruction of the United Kingdom has already happened. Down the the little Englander fascist wanker's and Britnats who call themselves a government in Westminster. Assisted by the Labour tartans Tories. And in terms of the upstarts separatist in Westminster. All have been elected. As Scotland sits with 3 Prime Ministers this year. Non of whom were voted by the Scots. Not to mention as the Britnats seem to forget the once in a generation went with the caveat provided there was no material change in circumstances. But trust me it is not going away. What was that about the mother of parliament.
|
|