|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 13, 2024 13:55:34 GMT
The problem with this plan is, they will take the £3k and a free one way economy ticket to Rwanda. Once in Rwanda they will quickly discover they don't get all the benefits and freebies they got in this country so they will use the £3k to buy a first class ticket back to Londonistan and of course, it would be against their human rights to stop them. In fact, it would probably be racist. which is why it needs to be conditional upon getting the three grand that they sign up to agree they can never try it on again with us. THEN it becomes rather a good deal Yes on the face of it that seems reasonable. But after an immigrant HAS agreed to such a deal then weeks later he turned up back in this country, would the ECtHR and lefty lawyers such as Starmer insist signing such a document was against his human rights in the first place? In view of what's happened in the past I tend to think they would. At which point the whole legal circus would start again. Personally I don't think any scheme like this stands a chance of working as long as we remain signatories to the ECHR and come under the influence of the ECtHR. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Mar 13, 2024 14:07:16 GMT
I don't have much of an issue with this scheme, but I do wonder
a) what's in it for Rwanda, as the previous scheme was reciprocal?
b) is it an admission that the current scheme won't get off the ground?
c) who would it act as a deterrent for?
|
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Mar 13, 2024 14:13:49 GMT
my thoughts exactly. If they want the £3k they need to open an account with the bank of Rwanda and claim it in person there and if they transfer it in to dollars they'll have $3,838.47 exchange rate, so they'll make $838.47 before they hit the tarmac. 🙈 |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 13, 2024 14:58:29 GMT
I don't have much of an issue with this scheme, but I do wonder Well of course you have no issue with it. Lefties always enjoy pissing other peoples money up the wall. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 13, 2024 15:00:58 GMT
I don't have much of an issue with this scheme, but I do wonder Well of course you have no issue with it. Lefties always enjoy pissing other peoples money up the wall. andrea hasn't even realised that Rwanda use the dollar and the RWF, he just looks for excuses to be outraged. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Mar 13, 2024 16:29:17 GMT
Well of course you have no issue with it. Lefties always enjoy pissing other peoples money up the wall. andrea hasn't even realised that Rwanda use the dollar and the RWF, he just looks for excuses to be outraged. In what world have you interpreted "I don't have much of an issue with this scheme" as being "outraged"? My guess is you didn't actually read what I wrote. 🙃 |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 13, 2024 17:05:29 GMT
andrea hasn't even realised that Rwanda use the dollar and the RWF, he just looks for excuses to be outraged. In what world have you interpreted "I don't have much of an issue with this scheme" as being "outraged"? My guess is you didn't actually read what I wrote. 🙃 Why would I need to Andy? Your posts are all the same. Anyhing that NORMAL people think or post you post the exact opposite... |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Mar 13, 2024 19:20:02 GMT
Right, so am I outraged here or am I OK with the proposal?
And then when you've answered that, there were the 3 points that I raised... 🙄
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 13, 2024 19:59:58 GMT
Right, so am I outraged here or am I OK with the proposal? And then when you've answered that, there were the 3 points that I raised... 🙄 You have no point to make Andy apart from the same old same old.. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Mar 13, 2024 20:08:36 GMT
I don't have much of an issue with this scheme, but I do wonder
a) what's in it for Rwanda, as the previous scheme was reciprocal?
b) is it an admission that the current scheme won't get off the ground?
c) who would it act as a deterrent for?
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 13, 2024 20:15:14 GMT
I don't have much of an issue with this scheme, but I do wonder a) what's in it for Rwanda, as the previous scheme was reciprocal? b) is it an admission that the current scheme won't get off the ground? c) who would it act as a deterrent for? Whoa there Andy hold your horses. You want your questions asnwered but are not prepared to answer any questions asked too you....I have been waiting for months now for you to answer the simple question of stating just "one good thing that khans has done for london" and am still awaiting the answer... |
|
