|
|
Post by steppenwolf on Mar 3, 2024 7:32:20 GMT
I think that the Electoral Commission (or whoever's job it is) should monitor what goes on in the mayoral election. They should check the mosques for imams who tell people who to vote for (illegal) and the people who go round collecting signed ballots. Best of all the postal vote should either be banned or only be eligible for people who have a genuine reason for not being able to vote personally. Also they should cross check the ballots for loads of people living in 1 bed flats and dead people voting. It's not that hard to do but it's never done. Maybe in the past voting fraud was minimal but it's rife in the muslim community and always has been.
Peter Cardwell was saying yesterday that he couldn't believe how lax the rules around postal votes were. In Northern Ireland it's actually very difficult to get a postal vote unless you're severely disabled and even then you have to get approval. Yet in Rochdale I think most of the votes were postal. It's a joke.
|
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Mar 3, 2024 9:38:23 GMT
Blair removed all the checks on postal votes
In common with many similar working men and women, my application for a postal vote in the eighties was granted after I ticked the box declaring that my job took me away from home making it difficult to travel back to vote.
Other reasons including disability were available, but unless you met one then a postal vote was never a 'right'. Ironically I think getting a proxy to vote for you was actually easier
Blair saw postal votes as a way to engage a wider audience but immediately we started to see inappropriate levels of 'activist canvasser engagement' in the process leading to the point where by 2010 the electoral commission had a voluntary code of conduct in place and invited all candidates and parties to declare their support for and adherence to their code.
I of course was delighted to sign up
The only party that didn't round my way was Labour
|
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Mar 3, 2024 9:45:58 GMT
And Khan does nothing but accuse others of made-up phobias.......Absurd the amount of damage Khan has done to London in just 8 years. One of the previous envys of the world.
Manhunt for moped rider who opened fire on pub with a shotgun while being chased by police: Two suspects flee Clapham Common on foot after gunning down two women and 'running over' a third,,,
Police will today continue to hunt for a moped driver who opened fire on a south Londonistan pub with a shotgun during a police chase.
Detectives said the gunman and a second suspect are still at large after shooting two women at The Belle Vue pub in Clapham Common and running over a third before fleeing from the scene on foot - leaving behind the weapon and the moped.
The gunman had fired the suspected shotgun from the moped while the pair were being chased by police officers near Clapham Common South Side.
I have no doubt that a greater blame lies with the shite found on the Social Media sites, than has anything to do with Khan. But that wouldn't matter to the get Khan brigade. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Mar 3, 2024 9:48:31 GMT
Just part and parcel of life in a big city … Yes. "Terrorism is just part and parcel of life in a big city" as Khan memorably said. Isn't it an incredible coincidence that London has been taken over by muslim extremists while under the rule of Sadiq Khan - who is a hard-line muslim. Yet the BBC and the Left say it's nothing to do with Khan. Should Khan say, 'You are a Muslim, therefore you cannot live in London' ? |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 3, 2024 9:52:46 GMT
Yes. "Terrorism is just part and parcel of life in a big city" as Khan memorably said. Isn't it an incredible coincidence that London has been taken over by muslim extremists while under the rule of Sadiq Khan - who is a hard-line muslim. Yet the BBC and the Left say it's nothing to do with Khan. Should Khan say, 'You are a Muslim, therefore you cannot live in London' ? No, he should say 'You are a terrorist Muslim, therefore you cannot live in London', if you are a peaceful law abiding Muslim you are welcome in London.
That's what we should be hearing from Khan, but he refuses to denounce any form of terrorism, especially if it's related to Muslims.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 3, 2024 9:58:28 GMT
Should Khan say, 'You are a Muslim, therefore you cannot live in London' ? No, he should say 'You are a terrorist Muslim, therefore you cannot live in London', if you are a peaceful law abiding Muslim you are welcome in London.
That's what we should be hearing from Khan, but he refuses to denounce any form of terrorism, especially if it's related to Muslims.
Thats if you could find the useless wanker.. He always seems to be AWOL when the shit hits the fan.. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Mar 3, 2024 10:11:55 GMT
Polls are just an attempt to give credibility to it . Where are these polls taking place , Brick lane ? No Tower Hamlets mate LOL ...Dare I mention his demographis or colour as I wouldn't want to upset the lefty showflakes?
Tower Hamlets mayor was elected after corrupt campaign, high court told
This article is more than 9 years old
Residents of London borough allege Lutfur Rahman and his workers filled out other people’s ballot papers and smeared his opponents as racist
In 2021, 43.8% of usual residents in the City of London reported having "No religion" Percentage of usual residents by religion, City of London 0% 2011 2021 ClassificationcomparisonsPercentage in City of London Percentage in undefined No religion 34.2% to 43.8% Christian 45.3% to 34.7% Buddhist 1.2% to 1.1% Hindu 2.0% to 2.4% Jewish 2.3% to 2.1% Muslim 5.5% to 6.3% ----------- Leaving 93.7% non-Muslims. Sikh 0.2% to 0.1% Other 0.4% to 0.6% Not answered 8.8% to 8.9% |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Mar 3, 2024 10:16:15 GMT
Should Khan say, 'You are a Muslim, therefore you cannot live in London' ? No, he should say 'You are a terrorist Muslim, therefore you cannot live in London', if you are a peaceful law abiding Muslim you are welcome in London.
That's what we should be hearing from Khan, but he refuses to denounce any form of terrorism, especially if it's related to Muslims.
Khan does not have the ability to determine who is and who is not a terrorist. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Mar 3, 2024 10:17:24 GMT
No, he should say 'You are a terrorist Muslim, therefore you cannot live in London', if you are a peaceful law abiding Muslim you are welcome in London.
That's what we should be hearing from Khan, but he refuses to denounce any form of terrorism, especially if it's related to Muslims.
Thats if you could find the useless wanker.. He always seems to be AWOL when he shit hits the fan.. Why don't you post facts instead of opinions? |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 3, 2024 10:24:51 GMT
No, he should say 'You are a terrorist Muslim, therefore you cannot live in London', if you are a peaceful law abiding Muslim you are welcome in London.
That's what we should be hearing from Khan, but he refuses to denounce any form of terrorism, especially if it's related to Muslims.
Khan does not have the ability to determine who is and who is not a terrorist. He has the police and intelligence service at his disposal, he has CCTV footage of terrorists marching through London blatantly waving racist banners and chanting hate crimes of antisemitism, while supporting Hamas, why isn't Khan sitting with the intelligence services and hunting these terrorists down?
Because he doesn't want to, because secretly he supports them, exactly what Lee Anderson has accused him of, because Lee Anderson has probably being privy to secret service information regarding Khans connections
|
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Mar 3, 2024 14:36:33 GMT
No Tower Hamlets mate LOL ...Dare I mention his demographis or colour as I wouldn't want to upset the lefty showflakes?
Tower Hamlets mayor was elected after corrupt campaign, high court told
This article is more than 9 years old
Residents of London borough allege Lutfur Rahman and his workers filled out other people’s ballot papers and smeared his opponents as racist
In 2021, 43.8% of usual residents in the City of London reported having "No religion" Percentage of usual residents by religion, City of London 0% 2011 2021 ClassificationcomparisonsPercentage in City of London Percentage in undefined No religion 34.2% to 43.8% Christian 45.3% to 34.7% Buddhist 1.2% to 1.1% Hindu 2.0% to 2.4% Jewish 2.3% to 2.1% Muslim 5.5% to 6.3% ----------- Leaving 93.7% non-Muslims. Sikh 0.2% to 0.1% Other 0.4% to 0.6% Not answered 8.8% to 8.9% Why have you tried to divert the thread away from Tower Hamlets to the irrelevant City of London? Don't you know that they are completely different places ? |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Mar 3, 2024 15:57:51 GMT
Khan does not have the ability to determine who is and who is not a terrorist. He has the police and intelligence service at his disposal, he has CCTV footage of terrorists marching through London blatantly waving racist banners and chanting hate crimes of antisemitism, while supporting Hamas, why isn't Khan sitting with the intelligence services and hunting these terrorists down?
Because he doesn't want to, because secretly he supports them, exactly what Lee Anderson has accused him of, because Lee Anderson has probably being privy to secret service information regarding Khans connections
His job is running London, not immigration. Your insinuations and opinions only exposes your total bias. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 3, 2024 16:09:25 GMT
He has the police and intelligence service at his disposal, he has CCTV footage of terrorists marching through London blatantly waving racist banners and chanting hate crimes of antisemitism, while supporting Hamas, why isn't Khan sitting with the intelligence services and hunting these terrorists down?
Because he doesn't want to, because secretly he supports them, exactly what Lee Anderson has accused him of, because Lee Anderson has probably being privy to secret service information regarding Khans connections
His job is running London, not immigration. Your insinuations and opinions only exposes your total bias. Don't be daft you silly old fool, he has not ONCE condemned any of these Palestine/Hamas protest marches, with their Racist antisemitic hate chants, any human with a spark of decency in them would condemn this behaviour, this isn't just any human this is the Mayor of London we are talking about ....... he should be Horrified and mortified and SAY SO OUT LOUD. ......... The shithouse little racist weasel. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Mar 3, 2024 16:16:02 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Mar 3, 2024 16:49:45 GMT
In 2021, 43.8% of usual residents in the City of London reported having "No religion" Percentage of usual residents by religion, City of London 0% 2011 2021 ClassificationcomparisonsPercentage in City of London Percentage in undefined No religion 34.2% to 43.8% Christian 45.3% to 34.7% Buddhist 1.2% to 1.1% Hindu 2.0% to 2.4% Jewish 2.3% to 2.1% Muslim 5.5% to 6.3% ----------- Leaving 93.7% non-Muslims. Sikh 0.2% to 0.1% Other 0.4% to 0.6% Not answered 8.8% to 8.9% Why have you tried to divert the thread away from Tower Hamlets to the irrelevant City of London? Don't you know that they are completely different places ? Yes, Tower Hamlets, although still in London does have an independent elected Mayer of its own. So thanks for the reminder. Perhaps Jonksy's reference to Kharnage misled me. The OP refers to Mayoral elections and the Muslim vote which was shown to be fraudulent 9 years ago. Today Muslims in tower Hamlets represent just under than half the population there. Nevertheless I do see Muslims as an increasing threat in terms of politics. I have no doubt that once they become the majority in some areas the UK will start to have real problems. Unfortunately the huge lie by the Palestinian Muslim Arabs and much of the Arab world, which seems to be widely accepted, that they are the long suffering victims of Israeli violence, so easily unites Muslims in whatever course they wish to take. IMO, until that lie is quashed there will be no way the threat from an ever more united Muslim movement in the UK can be stopped. Because while that lie exists, even non-Muslims get roped in. |
|
