|
Post by wapentake on Feb 1, 2024 19:05:43 GMT
Yes it seems he had a conviction for flashing and sexual assault,clearly if you’re a guest here from Afghanistan or anywhere else that conviction should’ve triggered an immediate deportation order.
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 1, 2024 19:11:09 GMT
If this man is indeed Yazidi, I would have thought there is every chance that he is a refugee here. While a domestic issue or sadly a “honour” issue still look most likely, the severe facial injury, the violence to the child and the fact that the police say they don’t know the motive for the attack don’t seem to fit that explanation. I imagine we will know more in the next few days. And that excuses the arsehole how exactly dappy?
|
|
|
Post by dappy on Feb 1, 2024 19:17:18 GMT
No motivation can possibly justify such an attack of course.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 1, 2024 20:17:08 GMT
Iirc Yazidis were violently oppressed by ISIS .
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Feb 1, 2024 20:47:54 GMT
Iirc Yazidis were violently oppressed by ISIS . According to locals he’s an Afghan,who knows for sure though.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 1, 2024 20:53:06 GMT
The fruits of multiculturalism.
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Feb 1, 2024 21:33:36 GMT
Diversity is our Strength™.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 1, 2024 22:00:46 GMT
Looks like he’s got a history of sexual assaults too.
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Feb 1, 2024 22:02:27 GMT
Abdul really is the poster boy for a failed asylum system.
Twice rejected for asylum on the 3rd attempt his claim was allowed - then a convicted sex attacker - now a manhunt underway for an attack that left 9 injured..
One wonders what this guy has to do before he is deported?.
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Feb 1, 2024 22:04:47 GMT
www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68167793Hey Dappy, this gets better by the minute … So this guy jumped in the back of a lorry and arrived here seven years ago, got done for exposing himself and sexual assault, for which apparently he got a community work order, which was completed by 2020. Denied asylum TWICE he got lucky (or maybe had a judge appointed to meet a diversity quota ?) third time round But as Dappy says, it’s good to wait for the facts. I can’t wait to see who the defence and judge at his immigration hearing were…. Sounds like just the sort of cutizen Starmer would fight to get the vote for…
|
|
|
Post by dappy on Feb 1, 2024 22:47:37 GMT
It’s always right to wait for the facts John. There are still many questions to understand in respect of the attack and the motivation. We should know more in due course.
If you want to talk asylum, let’s talk asylum. If you read my posting history you will see that I have been consistent that while we absolutely should accept people who need asylum, our process is shambolic and broken. I have been consistent in arguing that decision making should be sped up and that appeals restricted to one. We should learn from other countries in respect of their acceptance criteria - most accept a much lower percentage of claims. And of course we need to tighten up deporting those who fail Clearly someone who has committed a serious criminal offence should not be eligible for asylum. Why is our system so poor?. Because successive Home Secretaries over many years have been far more interested in tabloid headlines with nonsense schemes like Rwanda instead of doing the unglamorous but necessary boring job of fixing the system. Yet again the consequences of the likes of Johnson and Patel and Braverman’s power games have real life consequences.
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Feb 1, 2024 22:56:25 GMT
He was idiotically given asylum.
|
|
|
Post by Dogburger on Feb 2, 2024 6:11:34 GMT
He was idiotically given asylum. On the say of a Priest who vouched for him apparently at the third time of asking as a Christian convert .The system is obviously completely broken ,we have imported the third world into the UK so why are we so surprised when they bring their third world shit with them ? And still they come .
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Feb 2, 2024 7:52:35 GMT
So Abdul had his asylum claim rejected twice but was allowed after he (supposedly) converted to Christianity. How does that work? - I thought asylum seekers were supposed to be fleeing for their lives, their religion is irrelevant to that.
Of course this case almost exactly mirrors that of the Liverpool bomber Emad Jamil Al-Swealmeen – who blew himself up outside a women’s hospital on Remembrance Sunday in 2021. Emad was another one who made a conversion to Christianity to improve his chances of being granted asylum after first being rejected.
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Feb 2, 2024 8:50:30 GMT
So Abdul had his asylum claim rejected twice but was allowed after he (supposedly) converted to Christianity. How does that work? - I thought asylum seekers were supposed to be fleeing for their lives, their religion is irrelevant to that. Just a guess? Perhaps , after his conversion, he could argue that he could not return safely. "Your safety becomes our problem" is very easily exploited
|
|