|
|
Post by Handyman on Jan 30, 2024 20:52:30 GMT
Serial child killer Lucy Letby has had an initial bid to challenge her convictions for murdering seven babies and attempting to kill another six refused by the Court of Appeal.
The 34-year-old former nurse lodged an application for permission to appeal against her convictions in September.
A judge has since refused her application after considering the case documents, a judicial spokeswoman said.
Letby was sentenced to multiple whole life orders in August.
The offences took place at the Countess of Chester Hospital's neonatal unit where Letby worked between June 2015 and June 2016.
|
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Feb 3, 2024 19:45:40 GMT
Serial child killer Lucy Letby has had an initial bid to challenge her convictions for murdering seven babies and attempting to kill another six refused by the Court of Appeal. The 34-year-old former nurse lodged an application for permission to appeal against her convictions in September. A judge has since refused her application after considering the case documents, a judicial spokeswoman said. Letby was sentenced to multiple whole life orders in August. The offences took place at the Countess of Chester Hospital's neonatal unit where Letby worked between June 2015 and June 2016. Give you Credit you.also post about crimes Committed by White English . Funny the usual. Right wingers of justice haven't commented on this Awful Crime. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Feb 3, 2024 19:52:34 GMT
Serial child killer Lucy Letby has had an initial bid to challenge her convictions for murdering seven babies and attempting to kill another six refused by the Court of Appeal. The 34-year-old former nurse lodged an application for permission to appeal against her convictions in September. A judge has since refused her application after considering the case documents, a judicial spokeswoman said. Letby was sentenced to multiple whole life orders in August. The offences took place at the Countess of Chester Hospital's neonatal unit where Letby worked between June 2015 and June 2016. Give you Credit you.also post about crimes Committed by White English . Funny the usual. Right wingers of justice haven't commented on this Awful Crime. Don't be daft, lefty: It was the subject of multiple threads over dozens of pages when it was current news. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 3, 2024 19:53:59 GMT
Serial child killer Lucy Letby has had an initial bid to challenge her convictions for murdering seven babies and attempting to kill another six refused by the Court of Appeal. The 34-year-old former nurse lodged an application for permission to appeal against her convictions in September. A judge has since refused her application after considering the case documents, a judicial spokeswoman said. Letby was sentenced to multiple whole life orders in August. The offences took place at the Countess of Chester Hospital's neonatal unit where Letby worked between June 2015 and June 2016. Give you Credit you.also post about crimes Committed by White English . Funny the usual. Right wingers of justice haven't commented on this Awful Crime. If you bothered to check you would have found these threads …among more . |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Feb 3, 2024 19:55:16 GMT
Yes, lefty - this board continued just fine in your absence.
|
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Feb 3, 2024 20:42:34 GMT
OK far enough I was on about this Thread not seen the others I was away at the time. But think you proven my point so has the other Guy . Only posting on this Thread to comment about me .when this thread been about at least four Days. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 3, 2024 20:45:10 GMT
OK far enough I was on about this Thread not seen the others I was away at the time. But think you proven my point so has the other Guy . Only posting on this Thread to comment about me .when this thread been about at least four Days. If your point is that you made a false statement because you didn’t bother t check then you have proven your point . Other than that , you haven’t . |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Feb 4, 2024 0:33:51 GMT
Serial child killer Lucy Letby has had an initial bid to challenge her convictions for murdering seven babies and attempting to kill another six refused by the Court of Appeal. The 34-year-old former nurse lodged an application for permission to appeal against her convictions in September. A judge has since refused her application after considering the case documents, a judicial spokeswoman said. Letby was sentenced to multiple whole life orders in August. The offences took place at the Countess of Chester Hospital's neonatal unit where Letby worked between June 2015 and June 2016. She was found guilty in crown court, and before she appeared in that court the prosecuting authorities would have had to jump through many hoops to dot the i's and cross the t's in order to satisfy the jury and trial judge that she was guilty as charged. Which they were. The only reason she challenged her conviction is because a lefty lawyer told her that as a convicted mass murderer she had a right to appeal. The fact that it's a pointless appeal doesn't matter, it makes absolutely no difference to Lucy Letby. What does matter is that at public expense, left wing lawyers are making an absolute killing. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Feb 4, 2024 5:20:05 GMT
OK far enough I was on about this Thread not seen the others I was away at the time. But think you proven my point so has the other Guy . Only posting on this Thread to comment about me .when this thread been about at least four Days. Said the person who only posted to make a false allegation against people that he doesn't agree with.
That's called trolling, lefty. Plain and simple.
|
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Feb 4, 2024 9:01:08 GMT
I usually ignore him as I think he is not the full shilling or badly informed a rather sad individual , Letby is probably the worst baby killer this country has ever had to deal with, WTF has ethnicity or colour got to do with anything.
People of all shapes sizes backgrounds and ethnicities appear in our Courts year in year out, it is their actions and behaviour that are Judged not their ethnicity
She like all convicted persons has the right to appeal against either conviction or sentence, the Court of Appeal evaluated the case against her and dismissed her appeal no grounds to allow an appeal at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by Totheleft on Feb 4, 2024 12:28:22 GMT
I usually ignore him as I think he is not the full shilling or badly informed a rather sad individual , Letby is probably the worst baby killer this country has ever had to deal with, WTF has ethnicity or colour got to do with anything. People of all shapes sizes backgrounds and ethnicities appear in our Courts year in year out, it is their actions and behaviour that are Judged not their ethnicity She like all convicted persons has the right to appeal against either conviction or sentence, the Court of Appeal evaluated the case against her and dismissed her appeal no grounds to allow an appeal at all. , it is their actions and behaviour that are Judged not their ethnicity I like to differ on that |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Feb 4, 2024 12:30:02 GMT
I usually ignore him as I think he is not the full shilling or badly informed a rather sad individual , Letby is probably the worst baby killer this country has ever had to deal with, WTF has ethnicity or colour got to do with anything. People of all shapes sizes backgrounds and ethnicities appear in our Courts year in year out, it is their actions and behaviour that are Judged not their ethnicity She like all convicted persons has the right to appeal against either conviction or sentence, the Court of Appeal evaluated the case against her and dismissed her appeal no grounds to allow an appeal at all. , it is their actions and behaviour that are Judged not their ethnicity I like to differ on that You sound a bit racist . |
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Feb 6, 2024 0:03:41 GMT
I still think in cases this clear cut there's a place for rope.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 6, 2024 12:48:21 GMT
I still think in cases this clear cut there's a place for rope. It was a case based on circumstantial evidence. She was always there when the babies were injured or died. That is how the case was based. Although I am in favour of the death penalty, I wouldn't use it in her case, just in case. |
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Feb 7, 2024 16:55:02 GMT
I still think in cases this clear cut there's a place for rope. It was a case based on circumstantial evidence. She was always there when the babies were injured or died. That is how the case was based. Although I am in favour of the death penalty, I wouldn't use it in her case, just in case. Yes significant the circumstantial evidence lots of it found at her home, however as the Judge summing up at the end of her trial, judge Mr Justice Goss told the jury it was a case in which the prosecution "substantially, but not wholly" relied on circumstantial evidence Lots of expert witness testimony members of nursing staff Doctors who raised the alarm , Pathologists, etc, the Court of Appeal read all the evidence and the decision was no grounds on which to make an appeal against conviction |
|
