|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 10, 2024 16:41:54 GMT
I have clearly explained what I meant about there being no beneficiaries i.e. no beneficiaries! Despite my repeatedly pointing this out to you, you purposely, for your own reasons have chosen to ignore this fact. You have ignored my explanation and rambled on about a system that included beneficiaries. (Even though if any could be found they would receive their inheritance after IHT had been paid on the estate, which was my original point). Your post is a willful dishonest and arrogant piece of foolishness. A repeated problem which you might seek to overcome in any reply you might choose to make. I've come to the conclusion that you really are as thick as your posts indicate that you must be to post such utter trash - the only other possibility is that you are Price Harry in disguise who prattles on pathetically about ''his truths''. There is no other possible conclusion as you too have your own version of ''fact'' which bears no relation whatsoever to reality and you have the brass neck to try to deny postings you have made in your own name . Yet you insist calling others who call out your utter bullsh*t dishonest , fools , arrogant , wilful, infantile, liars etc (apologies if I've missed out any of your standard insults ) I repeat for the terminally thick IHT has fuck all to do with the beneficiaries , it never has had It is paid by the executor of the deceased's estate If a testator leaves 20% of their estate to beneficiary A and beneficiary B is left 10%, beneficiary A receives 20% of the estate and beneficiary B receives 10% once probate is granted -they do not receive a reduced bequest. If the testator leaves £10000 to beneficiary A they receive £10000 after grant of probate . There is no reduction subject to sufficient funds in the estate (care costs are expensive). If there is no will then intestacy rules kick in (flow chart previously posted) to find if there are beneficiaries If intestacy rules fail - the crown cops the lot (thus 100% instead of 40% IHT) 1. You are not so stupid as to be unable to work out that the value of the estate is, as far as the inheritors are concerned, reduced by the imposition of IHT. 2. Yes paid by the executor --- but not out of his own pocket --- it is paid out of the value of the estate. 3. Yes, after IHT is paid. The rest of your comments have nothing to do with my position. IMO your posts are moronic, aggressive and overly childish. I have no further interest in trying to educate you. |
|
|
|
Post by ratcliff on Jan 10, 2024 17:02:17 GMT
I've come to the conclusion that you really are as thick as your posts indicate that you must be to post such utter trash - the only other possibility is that you are Price Harry in disguise who prattles on pathetically about ''his truths''. There is no other possible conclusion as you too have your own version of ''fact'' which bears no relation whatsoever to reality and you have the brass neck to try to deny postings you have made in your own name . Yet you insist calling others who call out your utter bullsh*t dishonest , fools , arrogant , wilful, infantile, liars etc (apologies if I've missed out any of your standard insults ) I repeat for the terminally thick IHT has fuck all to do with the beneficiaries , it never has had It is paid by the executor of the deceased's estate If a testator leaves 20% of their estate to beneficiary A and beneficiary B is left 10%, beneficiary A receives 20% of the estate and beneficiary B receives 10% once probate is granted -they do not receive a reduced bequest. If the testator leaves £10000 to beneficiary A they receive £10000 after grant of probate . There is no reduction subject to sufficient funds in the estate (care costs are expensive). If there is no will then intestacy rules kick in (flow chart previously posted) to find if there are beneficiaries If intestacy rules fail - the crown cops the lot (thus 100% instead of 40% IHT) 1. You are not so stupid as to be unable to work out that the value of the estate is, as far as the inheritors are concerned, reduced by the imposition of IHT. 2. Yes paid by the executor --- but not out of his own pocket --- it is paid out of the value of the estate. 3. Yes, after IHT is paid. The rest of your comments have nothing to do with my position. IMO your posts are moronic, aggressive and overly childish. I have no further interest in trying to educate you. Pillock (as another poster often labels your ridiculously stupid bullsh*t posts) |
|
