|
Post by johnofgwent on Dec 11, 2023 11:58:48 GMT
I agree that there are many different way to go about it, but it's something that has been questioned since CCTV was first being introduced to monitor the people. The surveillance police state is evolving as fast as techonology. That's true, they need cameras to watch the cameras! so take two bombs next time
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Dec 11, 2023 15:50:49 GMT
Every camera that is destroyed will be replaced at the taxpayers' expense. Destroy enough of them and the fines will go up.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 11, 2023 15:57:48 GMT
Every camera that is destroyed will be replaced at the taxpayers' expense. Destroy enough of them and the fines will go up. How about a ULEZ referendum in Greater London?
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Dec 11, 2023 16:04:26 GMT
Every camera that is destroyed will be replaced at the taxpayers' expense. Destroy enough of them and the fines will go up. How about a ULEZ referendum in Greater London? Sure, let's have one on income tax, duty on cigarettes and free beer while we are at it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 11, 2023 16:29:46 GMT
Every camera that is destroyed will be replaced at the taxpayers' expense. Destroy enough of them and the fines will go up. How about a ULEZ referendum in Greater London? It won't happen in an authoritarian nanny state.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 11, 2023 16:54:17 GMT
How about a ULEZ referendum in Greater London? Sure, let's have one on income tax, duty on cigarettes and free beer while we are at it. same, more, more
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Dec 11, 2023 17:54:52 GMT
It will be fine Mr Khan said so, once they are in place everybody will settle down.
|
|