|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 26, 2023 7:44:56 GMT
Says the man who accused FS of "sick posting". It was a sick post by him correctly called out by me. People that propagate or insinuate false false perceptions of the vaccines are net killing people and have likely net killed thousands. When they get abusive to having their opinions challenged then yes it's time to play tough. Show me a post of mine where I have been 'abusive' to you, so far you have told me to 'fuck off', and accused me of being happy at people dying.
You are very sick individual, and you have tried your best to destroy this thread, because it's not your view, so now you just want to troll it and spoil it for those posters who are making valid points, you are not the kind of poster this forum wants.
Goodbye.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 26, 2023 7:48:14 GMT
T There is no 'conspiracy theories', unless you are suggesting doctors are in on the conspiracy, why else would they want to find out why high numbers of seemingly you fit and healthy people are dropping down dead for no apparent reason.
It's just as well these doctors are having the initiative to call for these studies, if it was left to the likes of you they wouldn't want to get to the bottom of it in case they were accusing of being 'nutty conspiracy theorists'  Anyone that's seen your first and second posts in this thread very much knows there are sus conspiracy theories being bandied about about Covid vaccines. And do fuck off with your malevolent false accusation I don't want SADS investigated. What I don't want is tragic deaths like that of Emily Wilcock being exploited to promote your Icke-isms. The only abusive sick poster on this thread is YOU ^^ Says the man who accused FS of "sick posting". It was a sick post by him correctly called out by me. People that propagate or insinuate false false perceptions of the vaccines are net killing people and have likely net killed thousands. When they get abusive to having their opinions challenged then yes it's time to play tough. |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Aug 26, 2023 9:38:57 GMT
Fairsociety perhaps you don't understand that attacking the message isn't abuse, attacking the messenger is.
When challenged with referenced facts on your views you first used industrial level sarcasm (fair enough) but soon moved to call me a 'rude poster' then 'He's only been back 5 minutes and already causing trouble, now he wants to dictate what you can post ..... his usual MO' then accused me of being a 'BULLY' (your capitalisation) ironically tried to order me about with 'Do not respond to post or threads that 'get you upset', I've seen you whinging and whining on the Mods thread, and here you are doing exactly what you are moaning about on that thread.' then called me an obnoxious poster'.
It's what you do FS, it's what you've always done
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Aug 26, 2023 9:42:32 GMT
Fairsociety perhaps you don't understand that attacking the message isn't abuse, attacking the messenger is. When challenged with referenced facts on your views you first used industrial level sarcasm (fair enough) but soon moved to call me a 'rude poster' then 'He's only been back 5 minutes and already causing trouble, now he wants to dictate what you can post ..... his usual MO' then accused me of being a 'BULLY' (your capitalisation) ironically tried to order me about with 'Do not respond to post or threads that 'get you upset', I've seen you whinging and whining on the Mods thread, and here you are doing exactly what you are moaning about on that thread.' then called me an obnoxious poster'. It's what you do FS, it's what you've always done So you can't show me a post where I have been abusive towards you?
Thought not, as every one can read, it is you who has been the aggressor in this thread, you really do show your true colours.
|
|
|
|
Post by oracle75 on Aug 26, 2023 11:00:19 GMT
@abridgen · Last weekend I was informed by senior clinicians working in the NHS that the overwhelming majority of doctors and nurses now have serious concerns about the ‘safety and efficacy’ of the experimental Covid 19 vaccines. But when will they speak out? That is why they are EXPERIMENTAL, idiot. God help the UK if that is the average mentality of an MP. Have you just written that with a straight face? I wrote it yo point out that Brigden was not talking about the FINAL APPROVED vaccine but the EXPERIMENTAL ones. His words. Any experimental drug is potentially harmful. Though i very much doubt if the idiot understood the difference, but just thought it said something useful about the covid vaccine. And why someone thought what he said supports his serious doubts about the vaccine was a useful link. In fact it adds nothing at all. |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Aug 26, 2023 11:11:44 GMT
Fairsociety perhaps you don't understand that attacking the message isn't abuse, attacking the messenger is. When challenged with referenced facts on your views you first used industrial level sarcasm (fair enough) but soon moved to call me a 'rude poster' then 'He's only been back 5 minutes and already causing trouble, now he wants to dictate what you can post ..... his usual MO' then accused me of being a 'BULLY' (your capitalisation) ironically tried to order me about with 'Do not respond to post or threads that 'get you upset', I've seen you whinging and whining on the Mods thread, and here you are doing exactly what you are moaning about on that thread.' then called me an obnoxious poster'. It's what you do FS, it's what you've always done So you can't show me a post where I have been abusive towards you?
Thought not, as every one can read, it is you who has been the aggressor in this thread, you really do show your true colours.
 I just quoted several to you |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Aug 26, 2023 11:36:44 GMT
OK government members. The rules were a government decision, and government members decided to ignore them including the PM. You seem determined to defend them. Please come back when you find your grown up debating skills. God almighty. After all that you still argue against a point I never made . I never claimed that you originally made that point. I just happened to have made the point that wasn't clear enough for you, so I clarified it for you. You still have not found your grown up debating skills, perhaps you never had any? |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 26, 2023 11:42:50 GMT
God almighty. After all that you still argue against a point I never made . I never claimed that you originally made that point. I just happened to have made the point that wasn't clear enough for you, so I clarified it for you. You still have not found your grown up debating skills, perhaps you never had any? So you thought you would wander off the point I made , got caught and posted even more projection. Sad but predictable. The reality is that you never read the posts properly and tried to refute a point that was never made . Now we will go through the same old shit where you do everything you can to obfuscate and follow up every post with a projection . |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Aug 26, 2023 11:43:47 GMT
God almighty. After all that you still argue against a point I never made . I never claimed that you originally made that point. I just happened to have made the point that wasn't clear enough for you, so I clarified it for you. You still have not found your grown up debating skills, perhaps you never had any? That's a bit rich, lol. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Aug 26, 2023 12:00:09 GMT
The moment this sort of information is exaggerated or misrepresented it becomes a conspiracy theory. Nothing wrong with the actual information and concern shown by the BMJ. You also overlook the fact that the BMJ are not in charge of the full facts, most Vaccinations have trials of five years or more, COVID had a trial of 12 months.
The data and statistics of the COVID Vaccine are still in its infancy, give it five years and the true scale of side-effects/deaths due to the Vaccine will be clearer.
Right now the BMJ are confirming YES there is a link between the COVID vaccine and deaths in young people.
No conspiracy theory, so far it's a case of ... 'what you don't want to hear'.
Covid vaccine had a 12 month trial, and was considered a necessity at a point when the Covid pandemic struck. so what's wrong with that. Obviously the fear was at that time, that the Covid pandemic would or could follow in the footsteps of the horrific pandemics that preceded it. The stock of kit for fighting such pandemics that were supposed to have been kept up to date but wasn't proves that Pandemics are predicted to occur and the country should be tuned up to fight them. As far as I'm aware there is no dispute about the Covid vaccine deaths and young people, but that is hindsight. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Aug 26, 2023 12:02:09 GMT
I never claimed that you originally made that point. I just happened to have made the point that wasn't clear enough for you, so I clarified it for you. You still have not found your grown up debating skills, perhaps you never had any? That's a bit rich, lol. Reflecting your own attitude, it wasn't really needed you were already sussed LOL |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Aug 26, 2023 12:23:38 GMT
I never claimed that you originally made that point. I just happened to have made the point that wasn't clear enough for you, so I clarified it for you. You still have not found your grown up debating skills, perhaps you never had any? So you thought you would wander off the point I made , got caught and posted even more projection. Sad but predictable. The reality is that you never read the posts properly and tried to refute a point that was never made . Now we will go through the same old shit where you do everything you can to obfuscate and follow up every post with a projection . 1. A distortion of the truth, but never mind it is what I expect from you. 2. An untruth that is a pure product of your imagination. SO, let me remind you of where YOU started: Page 3. Your post. "I made this point a while ago on a forum far far away and it didn’t seem to sink in. Partygate and Beergate is pretty compelling evidence that the people who were privy to COVID ‘ experts ‘ at the highest level( at the time ) were not frightened of the disease and didn’t feel that COVID was dangerous enough to heed the instructions given to the public.
Your post clearly describes Covid as not being a dangerous enough illness for Boris and his friends to heed the instructions given to the public. That is a direct attack upon the danger of Covid despite the mass deaths taking place. Not a very bright thing to post was it?
Now lets see your projection as you attempt to obfuscate your way out that reality  |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Aug 26, 2023 12:24:53 GMT
Reflecting your own attitude, it wasn't really needed you were already sussed LOL Sharp as ever see2, in fact I'm cut to the quick. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 26, 2023 12:36:56 GMT
So you thought you would wander off the point I made , got caught and posted even more projection. Sad but predictable. The reality is that you never read the posts properly and tried to refute a point that was never made . Now we will go through the same old shit where you do everything you can to obfuscate and follow up every post with a projection . 1. A distortion of the truth, but never mind it is what I expect from you. 2. An untruth that is a pure product of your imagination. SO, let me remind you of where YOU started: Page 3. Your post. "I made this point a while ago on a forum far far away and it didn’t seem to sink in. Partygate and Beergate is pretty compelling evidence that the people who were privy to COVID ‘ experts ‘ at the highest level( at the time ) were not frightened of the disease and didn’t feel that COVID was dangerous enough to heed the instructions given to the public.
Your post clearly describes Covid as not being a dangerous enough illness for Boris and his friends to heed the instructions given to the public. That is a direct attack upon the danger of Covid despite the mass deaths taking place. Not a very bright thing to post was it?
Now lets see your projection as you attempt to obfuscate your way out that reality You don’t even understand your own post and have proven that you didn’t undermine mine. You are the one who rolls out ‘ opinion ‘ and ‘ assumption’ as an attempt to refute a point , yet there you are telling me that ‘ didn’t feel” COVID was dangerous equals COVID was not dangerous. YOU”Is that what they ACTUALLY said, or is that just the assumptions made by people like yourself?“ and there you posting your assumption as fact. You have just supported my point that you have no idea what you read, make up stuff in your head then project your ignorance ..thanks 😁 |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Aug 26, 2023 12:48:01 GMT
Reflecting your own attitude, it wasn't really needed you were already sussed LOL Sharp as ever see2, in fact I'm cut to the quick. Trying to debate with see2 is a cross between arguing with a spoilt 7 year old and an elderly uncle with dementia. |
|
