|
Post by Steve on Aug 25, 2023 17:11:07 GMT
That's you can't disprove it so it must be true logical fallacy. Neither you or I could actually prove that Boris Johnson wasn't an alien reptilian from Mars in a clever disguise but I really don't think it's true. You however could position some sort of evidence that 'it is known that Khan was either used by Scientists for pumping in more money that would make their policies a political winner or at least conspired with them to force his policy through against an unwilling public.'. Well if it was true you could. Can you? No most definitely you who said it wasn't known, but it seems it most definitely known according to the media. So crack on then show us the evidence that counter claims it didn't happen. Except we already know you don't have any. So you say it's in the media, well post a link then because Google can't find one to back you. Hence why I said it was no so known.
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Aug 25, 2023 17:15:14 GMT
No most definitely you who said it wasn't known, but it seems it most definitely known according to the media. So crack on then show us the evidence that counter claims it didn't happen. Except we already know you don't have any. So you say it's in the media, well post a link then because Google can't find one to back you. Hence why I said it was no so known. It is in the original post and has been all over the mainstream media for days and as you on this thread and denying it, crack on and prove different.
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Aug 25, 2023 17:16:00 GMT
That's a quote of Nick Fletcher, the Tory MP for Don Valley who as a member of Parliament's Petitions Committee introduced two anti-ULEZ petitions earlier this year. As Mandy Rice Davies would put it: "well he would say that wouldn't he"As a point of fact he has no relevant scientific qualifications.
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Aug 25, 2023 17:17:42 GMT
That's a quote of Nick Fletcher, the Tory MP for Don Valley who as a member of Parliament's Petitions Committee introduced two anti-ULEZ petitions earlier this year. As Mandy Rice Davies would put it: "well he would say that wouldn't he"As a point of fact he has no relevant scientific qualifications. I have given you enough chances to prove everyone else wrong when trying muddy the waters at least have something to back it up.
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Aug 25, 2023 17:19:45 GMT
So you say it's in the media, well post a link then because Google can't find one to back you. Hence why I said it was no so known. It is in the original post and has been all over the mainstream media for days and as you on this thread and denying it, crack on and prove different. ^ No it is not in the original post ukpoliticsdebate.boards.net/post/135486/thread And judging by your failure to post a link it isn't 'in our mainsteam media for days' either
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Aug 25, 2023 17:22:01 GMT
It is in the original post and has been all over the mainstream media for days and as you on this thread and denying it, crack on and prove different. ^ No it is not in the original post ukpoliticsdebate.boards.net/post/135486/thread And judging by your failure to post a link it isn't 'in our mainsteam media for days' either I know you don't have the intelligence to read it but instead rely on pure bullshit. now do you have any evidence or not? last time of asking.
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Aug 25, 2023 18:37:18 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Aug 25, 2023 18:39:32 GMT
Does any intelligent poster want to back with evidence this assertion of facts by sheepy? (as sheepy can't) But then it is known that Khan was either used by Scientists for pumping in more money that would make their policies a political winner or at least conspired with them to force his policy through against an unwilling public. Are they both guilty, probably, was anything scientific pointing out what they were doing was more political than scientific buried, without doubt!
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Aug 25, 2023 18:45:22 GMT
LOL I know I should show him some sympathy but this care in the community lark is getting boring.
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Aug 25, 2023 18:47:38 GMT
LOL I know I should show him some sympathy but this care in the community lark is getting boring. Still can't back up your assertion then. Go cry to the loser in your mirror about how it's so nasty you've been shown up to be a liar. This site has no 'fake information rule' which is lucky for you but also makes stupid fake stories fair go to be shown up as what they are.
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Aug 25, 2023 18:49:11 GMT
LOL
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Aug 25, 2023 19:20:32 GMT
Funny he had to change his post when it was pointed out, oh yes I am so lucky to have him.
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Aug 25, 2023 22:05:18 GMT
Funny he had to change his post when it was pointed out, oh yes I am so lucky to have him. What are you going on about now?
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Aug 25, 2023 22:18:01 GMT
Funny he had to change his post when it was pointed out, oh yes I am so lucky to have him. What are you going on about now? Well at the moment I trying to steer a thread back on course by having an intelligent conversation, whereas trying to explain that even in simple language is beyond you obviously.
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Aug 25, 2023 22:30:04 GMT
What are you going on about now? Well at the moment I trying to steer a thread back on course by having an intelligent conversation, whereas trying to explain that even in simple language is beyond you obviously. Who do you say changed what post?
|
|