Should Southern England leave the UK? (Revised)

Well, unlike Brexit, we don't call it Sexit (obviously because of human sex like male and female). We just want to call it "Southern England departure of the United Kingdom". It means England could be separated all-together and putting Southern England its own freedom by granting the country itself independence from the United Kingdom as my opinions show that it may have been lagging behind from the rest of the UK (details will be unveiled in the coming days).

In my upcoming report, while it is not possible to have a hard border to the North, the blue passports will be kept but with major changes including passports from Southern England to the remaining parts of the UK would be restricted to all residents of this country to protect the new Southern English identity but remains in place on deliveries for supplies for another decade while considering the plans to build the new supply factories in the SEN by 2034.

However, it is possible that the National Health Service (NHS) could be saved after independence but re-imagined under the new name with improvised services by reducing waiting times and ambulance delays (with newly-recruited Southern English and international front-liners) to help save people's lives.

There are those on the other side of the Tamar from me who want Cornwall to be an independent nation. Very few people anywhere take them seriously.

But they do have their own Cornish nationalist party - Mebyon Kernow - which manages to get a handful of councillors elected here and there, but thats about it.

The point I am getting at though is that breaking states up into ever smaller units for selfish reasons will make life worse for everyone. The richer South seceding from the rest of the nation for selfish reasons of not wanting to share their wealth would soon find itself getting poorer without the easy exploitation of the North. For one thing, very little of what comes out from under the North Sea is off southern coasts, there tends to be more farmland per head in the north, and the south comes by much of its wealth by it sucking out of other parts of the country, which these parts will seek to stop if they are cut loose. And we have already seen the import/export bureaucratic nightmare deriving from Brexit. Repeating that on smaller scales would utterly stifle prosperity and increase costs. If Scotland, which has an independent history as a nation, chooses independence, then fair enough. But there is no independent history for Southern England unless you go right back to the days of Alfred the Great's Wessex and the Danelaw.

For my upcoming report, it is possible to say that the Premier League could also survive the breakaway but with a few changes ahead:

• During Southern England's independence, the Premiere League would be split into two - although there would be some name changes as well. In Southern England, the original Premiere League could become the Mammoth League (named after the extinct mammal from the Ice Age era) while the other would be renamed the UK Football League after independence. But it means, before independence, many of the football matches would either postponed or cancelled that would affect many of the Southern-based clubs including Tottenham, Coventry, and Arsenal. It also mean that Manchester United, Manchester City, and other Northern-based football clubs would leave the Premier League for the first time since the league's formation in 1990.
• Due to Southern England's departure from Britain, football players would no longer be permitted to travel to the UK in playing against other football clubs - leading to the Southernisation of football in Southern England. As a result, the managers and players could change dramatically before the remaining matches can be replaced as it may be unlikely for the current Premier League season to continue and instead new football clubs would join the remaining clubs and new matches would be scheduled under the newly-created Mammoth League but the matches won't be started until Autumn 2024 at the most.

LOL. 

Reality…..ermmm ok 

Where’s your sense of humour 

In answer to the thread title…

I remember being in university with an utter twat who thought kent should declare UDI and leave the rest of the country to its iwn devices.

It didn’t take me long to show how the while body of independent republic of kentish folk would in short order die of thirst and / or hunger or freeze to death off the back of not having infrastructure to feed, water, house and keep warm its population most of whom would have to smuggle themselves into London to work. And this was the late 70’s

I suppose we could erect razor wire and shoot anyone trying to get into the UK from Kent. That should certainly suggest a few need to paddle back to France