|
|
Post by sheepy on Jun 12, 2023 9:01:57 GMT
I will give you a lifeline, how much has it cost everyone to keep Boris out of the shit, when it also hasn't changed the outcome? which incidentally he was constantly advised to get himself in the shit.
|
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Jun 12, 2023 9:15:12 GMT
Now it is time for the real world for a while I will check back later for your thoughts on the matter.
|
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Jun 12, 2023 9:53:01 GMT
The old administrative 'one-two'
"Prime minister, this is an emergency situation and this is what our experts advise"
Some time later -
"The new legislation forbids the eating of cakes and we have several long range photographs of you with a chocolate eclair in your mouth"
|
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jun 12, 2023 10:08:14 GMT
The old administrative 'one-two' "Prime minister, this is an emergency situation and this is what our experts advise "
Some time later -
"The new legislation forbids the eating of cakes and we have several long range photographs of you with a chocolate eclair in your mouth"Wouldn't it have been more accurate to say that the the new legislation forbade the eating of cake (and other things) within the communicable range to other people of a potential fatal disease? Eating cake wasn't proscribed per se . |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Jun 12, 2023 10:15:16 GMT
The old administrative 'one-two' "Prime minister, this is an emergency situation and this is what our experts advise "
Some time later -
"The new legislation forbids the eating of cakes and we have several long range photographs of you with a chocolate eclair in your mouth"Wouldn't it have been more accurate to say that the the new legislation forbade the eating of cake (and other things) within the communicable range to other people of a potential fatal disease? Eating cake wasn't proscribed per se . If you really wanted to be accurate, you could say that the new legislation potential forbids the eating of cake under circumstances that can easily become a matter of administrative discretion. If you still don't see the clown's red nose, you may well have a soviet mindset |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jun 12, 2023 10:17:12 GMT
Wouldn't it have been more accurate to say that the the new legislation forbade the eating of cake (and other things) within the communicable range to other people of a potential fatal disease? Eating cake wasn't proscribed per se . If you really wanted to be accurate, you could say that the new legislation potential forbids the eating of cake under circumstances that can easily become a matter of administrative discretion. If you still don't see the clown's red nose, you may well have a soviet mindset No, it had more to do with the communication of a potentially fatal disease. That's why the legislation was introduced. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jun 12, 2023 10:18:43 GMT
If you really wanted to be accurate, you could say that the new legislation potential forbids the eating of cake under circumstances that can easily become a matter of administrative discretion. If you still don't see the clown's red nose, you may well have a soviet mindset No, it had more to do with the communication of a potentially fatal disease. That's why the legislation was introduced. The only fatal discease we have in the UK is remnant itus and there is no known cure. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jun 12, 2023 10:22:59 GMT
No, it had more to do with the communication of a potentially fatal disease. That's why the legislation was introduced. The only fatal discease we have in the UK is remnant itus and there is no known cure. If left untreated, it can result in Brino. Hurrah! |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Jun 12, 2023 10:24:11 GMT
If you really wanted to be accurate, you could say that the new legislation potential forbids the eating of cake under circumstances that can easily become a matter of administrative discretion. If you still don't see the clown's red nose, you may well have a soviet mindset No, it had more to do with the communication of a potentially fatal disease. That's why the legislation was introduced. Darling reaches for the horn on the clown car. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jun 12, 2023 10:27:26 GMT
No, it had more to do with the communication of a potentially fatal disease. That's why the legislation was introduced. Darling reaches for the horn on the clown car. That's okay. Nobody will die. Unlike what could potentially have happened after Boris' little soiree. |
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Jun 12, 2023 10:44:21 GMT
For all those foolish enough to follow Ding's repetitious nonsense about the promise of enacting the referendum result being verbal, here's a page from the leaflet circulated to every home in the UK promising to enact the result, so troll he is:  |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jun 12, 2023 10:47:00 GMT
For all those foolish enough to follow Ding's repetitious nonsense about the promise of enacting the referendum result being verbal, here's a page from the leaflet circulated to every home in the UK promising to enact the result, so troll he is: View AttachmentThose highly-paid QC's overlooked that for three years? Yet, you spotted it straight away, and all without any legal training at all. Good work, Sal! |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Jun 12, 2023 10:47:27 GMT
To me there seems to be nothing 'cycling'. We have effectively had a Blair administration since 1997 - enforced after Bair's departure via legal mechanism - and now we are moving over to another 'Blair' administration Arguably, Mags, we have effectively had a Thatcher administration since 1979, for much the same reasons. Each successive administration has largely had its hands tied by its predecessor, Given the level of taxation and public spending you would struggle to argue that... |
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Jun 12, 2023 10:47:56 GMT
For all those foolish enough to follow Ding's repetitious nonsense about the promise of enacting the referendum result being verbal, here's a page from the leaflet circulated to every home in the UK promising to enact the result, so troll he is: View AttachmentThose highly-paid QC's overlooked that for three years? Yet, you spotted it straight away, and all without any legal training at all. Good work, Sal! Overpaid, as ever. |
|
|
|
Post by Einhorn on Jun 12, 2023 10:48:58 GMT
Those highly-paid QC's overlooked that for three years? Yet, you spotted it straight away, and all without any legal training at all. Good work, Sal! Overpaid, as ever. Well, if you compare their legal advice with your amateur hour legal opinion, maybe there's some justification. |
|
