|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jun 2, 2023 10:54:17 GMT
Why are you posting your opinion as if it was a fact? I believe in his head he actually believes both are the same thing. I've pointed this out before. Your beloved starme was head of the CPS when both the Saville and Rotherham grooming gangs come to light. Is that truthfull and factual enough for you Sun Shine? You're so thick that you can't even remember that I'm not a Labour supporter. Thicko. LOL... one of the wokiest lefty loons we have the forum now denying he's a lefty loon, we know you're a lefty loon because you backtrack on most things you post when you are caught out, then accuse posters of not knowing fact from fiction, you wouldn't know a fact if it crept up and slapped you across the kisser. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2023 11:13:07 GMT
 The image is of a tweet which was made by Richard Scorer Richard Scorer is this countrys leading prosecution lawyer for victims of child abuse, he has acted against schools, Churches and local councils. He was involved in prosecuting on behalf of the victims of John Worboys. He was also involved in The Independent Inquiry Into Child Sexual Abuse which investigated cases in and around Rochdale, including claims made against Cyril Smith. The tweet states this : As one of the lawyers who represented Savile's victims, I can confirm that the attacks on Kier Starmer over this are totally unjustified. Starmer did more than any other DPP to advance the rights of victims. No DPP can control every decision, but the Crown Prosecution Service was much better under his leadership.So climb out of the gutter Jonksy and put a sock in it |
|
|
|
Post by dodgydave on Jun 2, 2023 12:51:52 GMT
You are wrong here buddy. They turned a blind eye to his outrageous behaviour for years until Politico broke the story. It is all over the media... "He was well known for getting too close to women" "It was widely known that he took prostitutes into the Common bar and would brag about it". So no, Labour didn't suspend him at the first opportunity... they suspending him when his crimes were splattered all over the press. Should be an interesting interview when Starmer is asked when he was first aware of the allegations lol. The problem with Starmer's Labour is that they claim to be morally better than the Tories, then it turns out they are not... just like you have tried to take the moral high ground and have been totally wrong lol. If you have ALL THE DETAILS about when and why he could / should have been suspended, and the date he was suspended, please post, because I do not trust your anti Labour / Starmer posts. That way we will know whether your posts are mostly based upon opinion or not. Is there any hill you won't die on when it comes to left-wing politics? lol. For the millionth time, I am not anti-Labour, I have only ever voted Labour. I have lost 18 days to strike action this year ffs, is that the actions of a Tory? lol However, you are right about Starmer. I do not like him because instead of focusing on a positive vision he spends all his time pretending Labour are morally above the Tories... which is complete crap... and a stupid position to take because you can be attacked on it when something like this happens. It is not "opinion", MPs are openly talking about his behaviour to the press, and what he has been up to and it is all over the fucking media. This is not a new story, it has been dragging on for months, or are you going to try and pretend you haven't read about it? You don't believe he should have been suspended for taking prostitutes into the Commons bar and then bragging about it? lol. My, my, what high moral standards you have. If Starmer was this morality king that he claims to be, he would have taken action earlier, not when the press force him into it. Where were Raynor and Philips when this was happening? Sitting on their hands for party reasons, just like the Tories do. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 2, 2023 17:39:24 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jun 2, 2023 18:07:24 GMT
He will....Unlike a tory if they did the same. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jun 2, 2023 18:09:45 GMT
'Where was the BBC's outrage when Jimmy Savile and Rolf Harris were raping girls?' Andrew Tate blasts BBC after he gives first interview...which collapses when he demands to ask his own questions Andrew Tate today blasted the BBC over their attempts to 'vilify' him after he gave the broadcaster his first interview since being detained over sex trafficking charges. In a combative interview, Tate repeatedly dismissed the BBC's questions about allegations of rape, human trafficking and exploitation of women - and instead demanded to ask his own questions. When quizzed about a testimony from a woman who has accused Tate of rape and exploitation, the influencer responded by asking his own question and telling the BBC journalist: 'You're not the boss here because I've allowed you into my house.' Following the interview, which collapsed after Tate, 36, said he was doing the BBC a 'favour' by speaking to the broadcaster, the self-professed misogynist launched a scathing attack on the broadcaster. He tweeted: 'The mainstream media which vilify me, beg me for interviews under the guise of balanced journalism. The Matrix is desperate.' Tate claimed that whilst he had been vilified, the BBC was not similarly outraged when the broadcaster's presenters Jimmy Saville and Rolf Harris were grooming and raping girls. www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12152475/Andrew-Tate-blasts-BBC-gives-interview-collapses.html |
|
|
|
Post by dodgydave on Jun 3, 2023 0:28:09 GMT
It just gets worse for Starmer... www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-65783805Labour actively warned the new intake of 2019 to stay away from Geraint Davies, as well as TWENTY NINE others. So here we have a sex pest that has been preying on women for THE ENTIRE LEADERSHIP of Starmer and he did nothing till forced to by the media. More worringly, why didn't the senior women (Angela Rayner, Jess Philips, Lisa Nandy and Emily Thornberry) complain about his behaviour? |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Jun 3, 2023 12:03:36 GMT
LOL, hold the front page just found this. In 2009 the left wing Labour supporting Guardian described Sir Jimmy Saville as, no not a predatory paedophile, but a... ... prodigious philanthropist who was honoured for his charity work.
That's the Guardian for you. No, that was the accepted view at the time. JIMMY Savile was once a national treasure until his horrific crimes came to light after his death. He was originally admired for his extensive charity work and was even knighted - before calls for the honour to be taken away after his vile sex attacks were later exposed after his death. Saville was knighted in 1990. That ^ is rubbish. The BBC knew about Saville for years, most people in TV were aware of persistent rumours regarding Saville and his activities. That is why the BBC kept him well away from the annual Children in Need telethon. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jun 3, 2023 12:08:32 GMT
No, that was the accepted view at the time. JIMMY Savile was once a national treasure until his horrific crimes came to light after his death. He was originally admired for his extensive charity work and was even knighted - before calls for the honour to be taken away after his vile sex attacks were later exposed after his death. Saville was knighted in 1990. That ^ is rubbish. The BBC knew about Saville for years, most people in TV were aware of persistent rumours regarding Saville and his activities. That is why the BBC kept him well away from the annual Children in Need telethon. So did starmer mate when he was head of the CPS. |
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Jun 3, 2023 12:21:31 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jun 3, 2023 23:05:07 GMT
Peter Mandelson had four dates scheduled in the diary to see Jeffrey Epstein... after the tycoon's jail term Mandelson was due to meet Jeffrey Epstein four times between 2010 and 2013 The four meetings were set despite Epstein being registered as a sex offender Peter Mandelson was scheduled to have four meetings with Jeffrey Epstein after the tycoon served time in prison for having sex with underage girls. The paedophile's private calendars reveal that the ex-Labour Cabinet Minister was due to meet the financier between 2010 and 2013, even though he was a registered sex offender. The diaries even suggest Lord Mandelson stayed at his £63 million New York mansion in 2012. The Mail on Sunday can also reveal that Prince Andrew was so comfortable in Epstein's home he invited a close friend over for tea. The calendars were revealed as part of hundreds of documents handed over by Epstein's estate during an investigation by the government of the US Virgin Islands, where he had a private island. www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12155999/Peter-Mandelson-four-dates-scheduled-diary-Jeffrey-Epstein.html |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Jun 3, 2023 23:49:35 GMT
That is tragic, it's disgraceful. If I'd have know that I'd never have watched the film. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Jun 3, 2023 23:55:15 GMT
Peter Mandelson had four dates scheduled in the diary to see Jeffrey Epstein... after the tycoon's jail term Mandelson was due to meet Jeffrey Epstein four times between 2010 and 2013 The four meetings were set despite Epstein being registered as a sex offender Peter Mandelson was scheduled to have four meetings with Jeffrey Epstein after the tycoon served time in prison for having sex with underage girls. The paedophile's private calendars reveal that the ex-Labour Cabinet Minister was due to meet the financier between 2010 and 2013, even though he was a registered sex offender. The diaries even suggest Lord Mandelson stayed at his £63 million New York mansion in 2012. The Mail on Sunday can also reveal that Prince Andrew was so comfortable in Epstein's home he invited a close friend over for tea. The calendars were revealed as part of hundreds of documents handed over by Epstein's estate during an investigation by the government of the US Virgin Islands, where he had a private island. www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12155999/Peter-Mandelson-four-dates-scheduled-diary-Jeffrey-Epstein.htmlThere is in all likelihood people who are still quietly flapping in case their associations with Epstein come to light. Mandelson doesn't surprise me, he always was a slippery bugger. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jun 6, 2023 21:02:04 GMT
No, that was the accepted view at the time. JIMMY Savile was once a national treasure until his horrific crimes came to light after his death. He was originally admired for his extensive charity work and was even knighted - before calls for the honour to be taken away after his vile sex attacks were later exposed after his death. Saville was knighted in 1990. That ^ is rubbish. The BBC knew about Saville for years, most people in TV were aware of persistent rumours regarding Saville and his activities. That is why the BBC kept him well away from the annual Children in Need telethon. Don't refer to my post as rubbish without proving your accusation, which incidentally sounds like hindsight righty garbage. (So called 'persistent rumours' are not evidence.) |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Jun 7, 2023 10:09:50 GMT
That ^ is rubbish. The BBC knew about Saville for years, most people in TV were aware of persistent rumours regarding Saville and his activities. That is why the BBC kept him well away from the annual Children in Need telethon. Don't refer to my post as rubbish without proving your accusation, which incidentally sounds like hindsight righty garbage. (So called 'persistent rumours' are not evidence.) Rubbish. |
|
