Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 17, 2023 13:07:28 GMT
Good God, Rees Mogg admitted it. Where did prisoners come from?"The Coalition Government could be forced to water down controversial plans to allow prisoners to vote in elections as Conservative MPs prepare to join forces with Labour to sabotage the proposal. The threat of a Tory rebellion grew as ministers disclosed that 28,770 prisoners would be entitled to vote under their plans – including 5,991 convicted of violence against the person, 1,753 of sexual offences, 2,486 of robbery and 4,188 of burglary." Don't tell me you missed that .... LOL
I told you Starmer wants your pets voting as long as it's a vote for Labour.
You need to read it all. "He said his 1996 words were a legal analysis, not a political viewpoint." This is 3 decades old, is that all you have? |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on May 17, 2023 13:30:22 GMT
Don't tell me you missed that .... LOL
I told you Starmer wants your pets voting as long as it's a vote for Labour.
You need to read it all. "He said his 1996 words were a legal analysis, not a political viewpoint." This is 3 decades old, is that all you have? Since when has Feb 2021 been 3 decades? |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on May 17, 2023 15:12:20 GMT
You need to read it all. "He said his 1996 words were a legal analysis, not a political viewpoint." This is 3 decades old, is that all you have? Since when has Feb 2021 been 3 decades? Since when has the sun been a reliable source of information? |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on May 17, 2023 15:20:23 GMT
Since when has Feb 2021 been 3 decades? Since when has the sun been a reliable source of information? Well you don't like the Sun, Daily Mail, Daily Express, I bet you believe everything you read in the lefty papers, it's how lefties operate. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 17, 2023 16:29:14 GMT
You need to read it all. "He said his 1996 words were a legal analysis, not a political viewpoint." This is 3 decades old, is that all you have? Since when has Feb 2021 been 3 decades? Since it was 1996. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 17, 2023 16:30:16 GMT
Since when has the sun been a reliable source of information? Well you don't like the Sun, Daily Mail, Daily Express, I bet you believe everything you read in the lefty papers, it's how lefties operate. I, for one, do not read the national papers. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on May 17, 2023 16:42:11 GMT
Since when has Feb 2021 been 3 decades? . Well you don't like the Sun, Daily Mail, Daily Express, I bet you believe everything you read in the lefty papers, it's how lefties operate. I, for one, do not read the national papers. So now you admit you haven't read a national paper since 1996 |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on May 18, 2023 7:06:55 GMT
Since when has the sun been a reliable source of information? Well you don't like the Sun, Daily Mail, Daily Express, I bet you believe everything you read in the lefty papers, it's how lefties operate. Your comment is only to be expected from someone so easily led by three of the more right-wing biased newspapers. First of all I am not a lefty, and secondly, it is not how I "operate". It wasn't just right-wing newspapers I gave up on in the 1970s/80s, it was ALL newspapers. I have never read any newspaper on anything like a regular basis since then. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2023 8:07:59 GMT
I, for one, do not read the national papers. So now you admit you haven't read a national paper since 1996Did I say that? No. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on May 18, 2023 8:37:17 GMT
Well you don't like the Sun, Daily Mail, Daily Express, I bet you believe everything you read in the lefty papers, it's how lefties operate. Your comment is only to be expected from someone so easily led by three of the more right-wing biased newspapers. First of all I am not a lefty, and secondly, it is not how I "operate". It wasn't just right-wing newspapers I gave up on in the 1970s/80s, it was ALL newspapers. I have never read any newspaper on anything like a regular basis since then. Thanks for clarifying why you know so little about what's going on in the real world, and always asking posters to 'explain', it's all becoming clear now.
It doesn't make you left or right if you read all media sources, it gives you a sense of balance, and then it's up to you to work out the logic, it does you no favours calling out any posters for being liars or quoting lies simply because you don't read or agree with the content.
|
|
|
|
Post by see2 on May 18, 2023 8:58:21 GMT
Your comment is only to be expected from someone so easily led by three of the more right-wing biased newspapers. First of all I am not a lefty, and secondly, it is not how I "operate". It wasn't just right-wing newspapers I gave up on in the 1970s/80s, it was ALL newspapers. I have never read any newspaper on anything like a regular basis since then. Thanks for clarifying why you know so little about what's going on in the real world, and always asking posters to 'explain', it's all becoming clear now.
It doesn't make you left or right if you read all media sources, it gives you a sense of balance, and then it's up to you to work out the logic, it does you no favours calling out any posters for being liars or quoting lies simply because you don't read or agree with the content.
Reading newspapers is one thing but promoting political mud slinging by newspapers and adding your own biased lies to it, as you have done in this case, clearly exposes that you are easily led by the mud slingers and therefore you absolutely lack both balance and logical processes, having left both out of your thoughts and out of your posts. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on May 18, 2023 9:05:24 GMT
Thanks for clarifying why you know so little about what's going on in the real world, and always asking posters to 'explain', it's all becoming clear now.
It doesn't make you left or right if you read all media sources, it gives you a sense of balance, and then it's up to you to work out the logic, it does you no favours calling out any posters for being liars or quoting lies simply because you don't read or agree with the content.
Reading newspapers is one thing but promoting political mud slinging by newspapers and adding your own biased lies to it, as you have done in this case, clearly exposes that you are easily led by the mud slingers and therefore you absolutely lack both balance and logical processes, having left both out of your thoughts and out of your posts. See there you go again calling people liars, you just can't help yourself can you.
It shows your ignorance the amount of people and times you call multiple posters liars, because you aren't in charge of the facts or have little to no knowledge on a subject you resort to your comfort zone of calling people liars, posters have to specify to you that they are giving you a 'opinion' so you can't call them liars, but even then you still call a opinion a lie.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, including you, in my opinion you are a uneducated nitwit, does that make it true?, well that's up to other people to judge for themselves and form their own 'opinion'.
|
|
|
|
Post by see2 on May 18, 2023 9:13:24 GMT
Reading newspapers is one thing but promoting political mud slinging by newspapers and adding your own biased lies to it, as you have done in this case, clearly exposes that you are easily led by the mud slingers and therefore you absolutely lack both balance and logical processes, having left both out of your thoughts and out of your posts. See there you go again calling people liars, you just can't help yourself can you.
It shows your ignorance the amount of people and times you call multiple posters liars, because you aren't in charge of the facts or have little to no knowledge on a subject you resort to your comfort zone of calling people liars, posters have to specify to you that they are giving you a 'opinion' so you can't call them liars, but even then you still call a opinion a lie.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, including you, in my opinion you are a uneducated nitwit, does that make it true?, well that's up to other people to judge for themselves and form their own 'opinion'.
YOU POSTED: ---" He's con artists, and who wants a deceiving, lying, treacherous, self-serving loser like him as our next Prime Minister. That is your opinion posted as a fact. And ---"The only way Starmer can win elections is through fraud, he's just admitted it."Again that is your opinion posted as a fact. In short your lies used to bolster the mud slinging by the Express. |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on May 18, 2023 9:31:26 GMT
See there you go again calling people liars, you just can't help yourself can you.
It shows your ignorance the amount of people and times you call multiple posters liars, because you aren't in charge of the facts or have little to no knowledge on a subject you resort to your comfort zone of calling people liars, posters have to specify to you that they are giving you a 'opinion' so you can't call them liars, but even then you still call a opinion a lie.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion, including you, in my opinion you are a uneducated nitwit, does that make it true?, well that's up to other people to judge for themselves and form their own 'opinion'.
YOU POSTED: ---" He's con artists, and who wants a deceiving, lying, treacherous, self-serving loser like him as our next Prime Minister. That is your opinion posted as a fact. And ---"The only way Starmer can win elections is through fraud, he's just admitted it."Again that is your opinion posted as a fact. In short your lies used to bolster the mud slinging by the Express. So now you can't distinguish between a opinion and fact?
We have to specify for the benefit of your stupidity that we are forming our opinions on what knowledge we gather on a topic.
Ok for the benefit of you it is my OPINION
Starmer is a con artist
who is deceiving, lying, treacherous, self-serving loser
the only way he can win elections is through fraud
^^this is all my opinion based on logic formed on information available in the public domain.
|
|
