|
|
Post by zanygame on Apr 19, 2023 18:06:45 GMT
£1.3million. The fee for delivering 200 illegal immigrants in a single boat.
No wonder they can't be stopped.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Apr 19, 2023 18:16:52 GMT
£1.3million. The fee for delivering 200 illegal immigrants in a single boat. No wonder they can't be stopped. Oh so those poor migrants don’t cross Europe on foot, picking berries and doing odd jobs to get them alive . They pay wads of money to criminals instead. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Apr 19, 2023 18:18:29 GMT
£1.3million. The fee for delivering 200 illegal immigrants in a single boat. No wonder they can't be stopped. Oh so those poor migrants don’t cross Europe on foot, picking berries and doing odd jobs to get them alive . They pay wads of money to criminals instead. Yep, 6.5k each. Whole families breaking themselves to get one member out. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Apr 20, 2023 9:58:43 GMT
Oh so those poor migrants don’t cross Europe on foot, picking berries and doing odd jobs to get them alive . They pay wads of money to criminals instead. Yep, 6.5k each. Whole families breaking themselves to get one member out. Whole families conspiring with criminals . |
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Apr 20, 2023 10:24:23 GMT
Oh so those poor migrants don’t cross Europe on foot, picking berries and doing odd jobs to get them alive . They pay wads of money to criminals instead. Yep, 6.5k each. Whole families breaking themselves to get one member out.
Surely the 6.5K is the fee for getting them in (the UK) since they were already out of wherever it was they originally came from?
|
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Apr 20, 2023 11:56:20 GMT
£1.3million. The fee for delivering 200 illegal immigrants in a single boat. No wonder they can't be stopped. It could be stopped. One direct method would be to use the special services to assassinate the people at the top of the organisations. News like that gets around quickly and the business model would fizzle out quickly. The UK government does this sort of thing occasionally when significant British security interests are at stake - but, apparently, not in this case.I have said if before - people trafficking is big business and has money to pay people with |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Apr 20, 2023 19:11:44 GMT
Yep, 6.5k each. Whole families breaking themselves to get one member out. Whole families conspiring with criminals . Usual petty answer. Don't you ever have anything proper to say. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Apr 20, 2023 19:15:20 GMT
Yep, 6.5k each. Whole families breaking themselves to get one member out.
Surely the 6.5K is the fee for getting them in (the UK) since they were already out of wherever it was they originally came from?
Not according to the interview I saw. The guy was from Somalia and said the traffickers want 6.5k to get you to your chosen destination in Europe. His choice was France. Another line was that a single boat containing 200 illegal immigrants netted the traffickers 1.3 million. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Apr 20, 2023 19:16:51 GMT
£1.3million. The fee for delivering 200 illegal immigrants in a single boat. No wonder they can't be stopped. It could be stopped. One direct method would be to use the special services to assassinate the people at the top of the organisations. News like that gets around quickly and the business model would fizzle out quickly. The UK government does this sort of thing occasionally when significant British security interests are at stake - but, apparently, not in this case.I have said if before - people trafficking is big business and has money to pay people withThe number of things special forces are supposedly capable of doing never ends. What do you think Red? |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Apr 21, 2023 0:00:25 GMT
Whole families conspiring with criminals . Usual petty answer. Don't you ever have anything proper to say. Usual petty reaction when you lose the argument . These people are finding £6.5K to pay criminals in order to illegally enter the UK . They should be taken to secure camps and everyday photos of the drab and Spartan camp should be sent to the people who financed them. Just to show them how their investment is doing . Pictures from Rwanda too , if they get their. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Apr 21, 2023 5:34:49 GMT
Usual petty answer. Don't you ever have anything proper to say. Usual petty reaction when you lose the argument . These people are finding £6.5K to pay criminals in order to illegally enter the UK . They should be taken to secure camps and everyday photos of the drab and Spartan camp should be sent to the people who financed them. Just to show them how their investment is doing . Pictures from Rwanda too , if they get their. I haven't made an argument. I gave some information for discussion. I'm pretty certain that even if your idea was feasible it would not work. However at least this is a proffered solution from you. |
|
|
|
Post by Dan Dare on Apr 21, 2023 8:10:38 GMT
The term 'camps' has such unfortunate historical connotations that I don't think the government of any liberal democracy would run the representational risk of putting asylum seekers in such places. Least of all the UK.
Although the Germans of all people did accommodate migrants in disused British Army barracks during the 2015 crisis.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Apr 21, 2023 9:20:03 GMT
Usual petty reaction when you lose the argument . These people are finding £6.5K to pay criminals in order to illegally enter the UK . They should be taken to secure camps and everyday photos of the drab and Spartan camp should be sent to the people who financed them. Just to show them how their investment is doing . Pictures from Rwanda too , if they get their. I haven't made an argument. I gave some information for discussion. I'm pretty certain that even if your idea was feasible it would not work. However at least this is a proffered solution from you. I discussed it when it was pointed out that these families were conspiring with criminals you didn’t have an answer so you projected that at me . These people are funding criminal gangs . They should be stopped . My idea would work if applied , once the criminals who conspired with traffickers found that their investment didn’t pay dividends then the criminal traffickers would have less people to traffick. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Apr 21, 2023 18:57:59 GMT
The term 'camps' has such unfortunate historical connotations that I don't think the government of any liberal democracy would run the representational risk of putting asylum seekers in such places. Least of all the UK. Although the Germans of all people did accommodate migrants in disused British Army barracks during the 2015 crisis. I agree its a tricky one. My best option is still to offer asylum sites outside the UK. All those arriving directly onto UK shores are immediately taken to one of the asylum centres in a third country. Rwanda would do. |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Apr 22, 2023 7:52:41 GMT
If the United States returns, it might be possible to set up significant international agreements to house such people in remote locations while they had various claims processed / denied. However, I now seriously doubt the United States will return.
|
|
