|
|
Post by sheepy on Apr 5, 2023 7:19:23 GMT
They seem to think that their own agendas come first, even when they are not in the best interest of the majority of people. This is minor compared with a lot of them. Its almost like they want a massive confrontation. |
|
|
|
Post by wapentake on Apr 5, 2023 9:25:55 GMT
Yeah and no Nazis in the family  Maybe not by DNA, but who knows what is hiding in the cupboard of history  No and no one complaining about others using verbal abuse as a tactic shortly after verbally abusing someone else. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Apr 5, 2023 13:13:50 GMT
No, my point has always to favour green energy. I don't know but I would not think it likely in the next five years, even longer if the war in Ukraine is not sorted out. I do however believe that green energy will play a part in reducing energy prices in the long run. I'll just remind you that our exchange started when I challenged you for saying "For instance wind energy is half as expensive as Gas"Well, it is not. You were wrong and you have used evasion and prevarication to go round in a circle. Waste of time, wasn't it? the only truth that I'm aware of is that it is cheaper to produce. There, now you have all the information and you can see how you jumped to the wrong conclusion. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Apr 5, 2023 13:14:52 GMT
Maybe not by DNA, but who knows what is hiding in the cupboard of history No and no one complaining about others using verbal abuse as a tactic shortly after verbally abusing someone else. Who said there was? |
|
|
|
Post by Dubdrifter on Apr 5, 2023 13:49:51 GMT
We don’t expect Charles to travel Easyjet or do-a-Greta and sail into Germany …but his Staff needs to address this issue and the RR transportation … just use this for visiting dignitaries and the Coronation etc. Nobody in the Country has set a GREENER EXAMPLE to the Nation than Charles in the way he has run and managed the Crown Estates … the MSM will always be there knocking and ridiculing him and all the Royals … the bad one’s are fair game … The Globalists don’t like any figurehead that might be a rallying point to counter the Totalitarian World Domination Agenda. That is why ALL Royals are blanket attacked these days … and the positives are ignored. So what jiggery-pokery is going on which says gas is 12p per kWh and electricity is 50p per kWh? Perhaps when we see the cheap electricity, we'll believe it. That particular claim has been made a few times on TV. But here is a report that makes a claim. Onshore wind is cheaper than coal, gas or nuclear energy when the costs of ‘external’ factors like air quality, human toxicity and climate change are taken into account, according to an EU analysis. The report says that for every megawatt hour (MW/h) of electricity generated, onshore wind costs roughly €105 (£83) per MW/h, compared to gas and coal which can cost up to around €164 and €233 per MW/h, respectively.
Nuclear power, offshore wind and solar energy are all comparably inexpensive generators, at roughly €125 per MW/h.
“This report highlights the true cost of Europe’s dependence on fossil fuels,” said Justin Wilkes, the deputy CEO of the European Wind Energy Association (EWEA). “Renewables are regularly denigrated for being too expensive and a drain on the taxpayer. Not only does the commission’s report show the alarming cost of coal but it also presents onshore wind as both cheaper and more environmentally-friendly.” www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/oct/13/wind-power-is-cheapest-energy-unpublished-eu-analysis-findsDid you factor in the expensive cost and environmental damage of turbine manufacture and the fact these sporadic generators last less than 20 years before scrapping. On and Offshore maintenance costs also need to be factored in, btw. Well he would wouldn’t he? As a German once said “I wish we still had a royal family” And a Brit replied “but you still do ” He did go and see the relatives whilst he was there. Of Course, but born and bred here that makes him British. Have you had your DNA done yet? DNA doesn’t determine whether you are entitled to British citizenship or residency status. In these days of acute sectarian behaviour by religious bullying factions … maybe some proportion of UK DNA should determine who should get a new style UK Passport!😋🤔 Quite a nice invite card - and Camilla should be Queen. It is. - I will look forward to one dropping through the letterbox Me too! …🤣😂 I’m a great support of Charles and his Conservation credentials … pity about this minor German glitch … blame the Staff … none of us can get good reliable staff these days … that don’t have a hidden agenda to undermine one …😋know what I mean, Dogburger?? My guess is maybe an ex-BBC/Guardian sleeper Hack got into the Palace transport and Security Division… trying to pull the Monarchy down … from the Inside? 🤔😎 |
|
|
|
Post by patman post on Apr 5, 2023 14:13:02 GMT
They seem to think that their own agendas come first, even when they are not in the best interest of the majority of people. This is minor compared with a lot of them. Its almost like they want a massive confrontation. I've just learned that the spouse of a King will be called Queen even though she is in fact a consort (eg, Queen Mary and Queen Alexandra).
However, this is another case of women's inequality — the spouse of a Queen regnant isn't called King (eg, Prince Albert and Prince Philip).
There's a lot of history, custom and practice, and tradition involved in running the UK's Royals and Head of State, but it appears their ranks are being slimmed down. Maybe now's not the time to worry about costs, but it might be interesting to compare the expenditures of, say, the complete costs of running the Presidents of France and the USA...
PS — on the charges of eco hypocrisy, are we sure that the Rolls Royce's and flights aren't running on low or zero carbon fuels...?
|
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Apr 5, 2023 14:23:04 GMT
They seem to think that their own agendas come first, even when they are not in the best interest of the majority of people. This is minor compared with a lot of them. Its almost like they want a massive confrontation. I've just learned that the spouse of a King will be called Queen even though she is in fact a consort (eg, Queen Mary and Queen Alexandra).
However, this is another case of women's inequality — the spouse of a Queen regnant isn't called King (eg, Prince Albert and Prince Philip).
There's a lot of history, custom and practice, and tradition involved in running the UK's Royals and Head of State, but it appears their ranks are being slimmed down. Maybe now's not the time to worry about costs, but it might be interesting to compare the expenditures of, say, the complete costs of running the Presidents of France and the USA...
PS — on the charges of eco hypocrisy, are we sure that the Rolls Royce's and flights aren't running on low or zero carbon fuels...?
The thing with Presidents they don't draw in the tourism attraction like the Royals, they generate more to the economy than they cost the UK tax payers, I'd say that was value for money...
It also owns more than half of Britain's shoreline and approximately 1,960,000 acres of agricultural land and forest. The average royal upkeep per annum cost UK taxpayers around £500 million, but Brand Finance estimates that the monarchy contributes £2.5 billion to the British economy in the same period.
... I mean let's face it, what US tourists want to catch a glimpse of creepy Joe.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Apr 5, 2023 14:25:00 GMT
I've just learned that the spouse of a King will be called Queen even though she is in fact a consort (eg, Queen Mary and Queen Alexandra).
However, this is another case of women's inequality — the spouse of a Queen regnant isn't called King (eg, Prince Albert and Prince Philip).
There's a lot of history, custom and practice, and tradition involved in running the UK's Royals and Head of State, but it appears their ranks are being slimmed down. Maybe now's not the time to worry about costs, but it might be interesting to compare the expenditures of, say, the complete costs of running the Presidents of France and the USA...
PS — on the charges of eco hypocrisy, are we sure that the Rolls Royce's and flights aren't running on low or zero carbon fuels...?
The thing with Presidents they don't draw in the tourism attraction like the Royals, they generate more to the economy than they cost the UK tax payers, I'd say that was value for money...
It also owns more than half of Britain's shoreline and approximately 1,960,000 acres of agricultural land and forest. The average royal upkeep per annum cost UK taxpayers around £500 million, but Brand Finance estimates that the monarchy contributes £2.5 billion to the British economy in the same period.
... I mean let's face it, what US tourists want to catch a glimpse of creepy Joe.
Only if he is behind bars... |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Apr 5, 2023 14:27:39 GMT
The thing with Presidents they don't draw in the tourism attraction like the Royals, they generate more to the economy than they cost the UK tax payers, I'd say that was value for money...
It also owns more than half of Britain's shoreline and approximately 1,960,000 acres of agricultural land and forest. The average royal upkeep per annum cost UK taxpayers around £500 million, but Brand Finance estimates that the monarchy contributes £2.5 billion to the British economy in the same period.
... I mean let's face it, what US tourists want to catch a glimpse of creepy Joe.
Only if he is behind bars... LOL |
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Apr 5, 2023 14:52:56 GMT
As pointed out earlier we cannot choose who our parents are or what they are, no can we pick who or what our relatives are, any way back to the King, he gave his first speech or the environment at the age of 21 years, he has campaigned vigorously ever since, he changed the farming methods on the lands he was made responsible for over many years. www.wired.co.uk/article/king-charles-iii-climate-environmental-activisBut as he states now he has to concentrate on other matters now he is King , but he still holds very strong views on the Environment and climate change |
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Apr 5, 2023 16:30:37 GMT
They seem to think that their own agendas come first, even when they are not in the best interest of the majority of people. This is minor compared with a lot of them. Its almost like they want a massive confrontation. I've just learned that the spouse of a King will be called Queen even though she is in fact a consort (eg, Queen Mary and Queen Alexandra).
However, this is another case of women's inequality — the spouse of a Queen regnant isn't called King (eg, Prince Albert and Prince Philip).
There's a lot of history, custom and practice, and tradition involved in running the UK's Royals and Head of State, but it appears their ranks are being slimmed down. Maybe now's not the time to worry about costs, but it might be interesting to compare the expenditures of, say, the complete costs of running the Presidents of France and the USA...
PS — on the charges of eco hypocrisy, are we sure that the Rolls Royce's and flights aren't running on low or zero carbon fuels...?
He is taking the piss, I wouldn't be thinking he is so far above everyone else it won't be biting back either. |
|
|
|
Post by Dogburger on Apr 5, 2023 18:34:45 GMT
It is , I will look forward to one dropping through the letterbox Chosing something to wear could be a bugger tho mate... Im not expecting front row fella . Maybe my Sunday best would do if they hide me behind a pillar  |
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Apr 5, 2023 18:36:53 GMT
They seem to think that their own agendas come first, even when they are not in the best interest of the majority of people. This is minor compared with a lot of them. Its almost like they want a massive confrontation. I've just learned that the spouse of a King will be called Queen even though she is in fact a consort (eg, Queen Mary and Queen Alexandra).
However, this is another case of women's inequality — the spouse of a Queen regnant isn't called King (eg, Prince Albert and Prince Philip).
There's a lot of history, custom and practice, and tradition involved in running the UK's Royals and Head of State, but it appears their ranks are being slimmed down. Maybe now's not the time to worry about costs, but it might be interesting to compare the expenditures of, say, the complete costs of running the Presidents of France and the USA...
PS — on the charges of eco hypocrisy, are we sure that the Rolls Royce's and flights aren't running on low or zero carbon fuels...?
It was the Kings later Mothers wish a wish she held for years that Camilla be given the title of Queen |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2023 19:28:24 GMT
I'll just remind you that our exchange started when I challenged you for saying "For instance wind energy is half as expensive as Gas"Well, it is not. You were wrong and you have used evasion and prevarication to go round in a circle. Waste of time, wasn't it? the only truth that I'm aware of is that it is cheaper to produce. There, now you have all the information and you can see how you jumped to the wrong conclusion. So it's my fault you got it wrong. Take responsibility for your own errors, there's a good chap. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Apr 5, 2023 19:57:24 GMT
We don’t expect Charles to travel Easyjet or do-a-Greta and sail into Germany …but his Staff needs to address this issue and the RR transportation … just use this for visiting dignitaries and the Coronation etc. Nobody in the Country has set a GREENER EXAMPLE to the Nation than Charles in the way he has run and managed the Crown Estates … the MSM will always be there knocking and ridiculing him and all the Royals … the bad one’s are fair game … The Globalists don’t like any figurehead that might be a rallying point to counter the Totalitarian World Domination Agenda. That is why ALL Royals are blanket attacked these days … and the positives are ignored. That particular claim has been made a few times on TV. But here is a report that makes a claim. Onshore wind is cheaper than coal, gas or nuclear energy when the costs of ‘external’ factors like air quality, human toxicity and climate change are taken into account, according to an EU analysis. The report says that for every megawatt hour (MW/h) of electricity generated, onshore wind costs roughly €105 (£83) per MW/h, compared to gas and coal which can cost up to around €164 and €233 per MW/h, respectively.
Nuclear power, offshore wind and solar energy are all comparably inexpensive generators, at roughly €125 per MW/h.
“This report highlights the true cost of Europe’s dependence on fossil fuels,” said Justin Wilkes, the deputy CEO of the European Wind Energy Association (EWEA). “Renewables are regularly denigrated for being too expensive and a drain on the taxpayer. Not only does the commission’s report show the alarming cost of coal but it also presents onshore wind as both cheaper and more environmentally-friendly.” www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/oct/13/wind-power-is-cheapest-energy-unpublished-eu-analysis-findsDid you factor in the expensive cost and environmental damage of turbine manufacture and the fact these sporadic generators last less than 20 years before scrapping. On and Offshore maintenance costs also need to be factored in, btw. Of Course, but born and bred here that makes him British. Have you had your DNA done yet? DNA doesn’t determine whether you are entitled to British citizenship or residency status. In these days of acute sectarian behaviour by religious bullying factions … maybe some proportion of UK DNA should determine who should get a new style UK Passport!😋🤔 It is. - I will look forward to one dropping through the letterbox Me too! …🤣😂 I’m a great support of Charles and his Conservation credentials … pity about this minor German glitch … blame the Staff … none of us can get good reliable staff these days … that don’t have a hidden agenda to undermine one …😋know what I mean, Dogburger?? My guess is maybe an ex-BBC/Guardian sleeper Hack got into the Palace transport and Security Division… trying to pull the Monarchy down … from the Inside? 🤔😎 1. In your opinion. Necessary duties that will take Charles thousands of miles will not be green, that is an obvious reality' If Charles could make them green he would. 2. I did not factor in anything, I did not do the assessment. All energy production have their costs and their maintenance. 3. Why state the obvious? No one suggested it did. |
|
