|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Mar 26, 2023 20:39:50 GMT
I say the Met police are racist. What, all of them? |
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Mar 26, 2023 20:41:40 GMT
I say the Met police are racist. What, all of them? No, just the one that Zany knows. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Mar 26, 2023 20:52:09 GMT
I couldn't give a flying fuck about the next sentence. Anymore than I would "Hitler was a bad man but.." zany using profanaties who would have thunked it? You don't know the difference between using a swear word to exaggerate a point and using swear words to describe a person. Probably a bit subtle for you. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 26, 2023 21:01:53 GMT
No, just the one that Zany knows. It's what exists behind the mask that matters. It's a hatefilled anxiety toward facts and reason, topped off with personal attacks for those who confidently destroyed his nonsense. |
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Mar 26, 2023 21:33:09 GMT
No, just the one that Zany knows. Ah, the voice in his head. That explains it. Dear old Zany, he cares you know. Even if he has absolutely no idea what he's caring about. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 27, 2023 0:00:27 GMT
zany using profanaties who would have thunked it? You don't know the difference between using a swear word to exaggerate a point and using swear words to describe a person. Probably a bit subtle for you. You are a typical hypocriticle remnant. But I would expect no more from a bumburgh deciple who is as subtle as a fart in an elevator. And a blatant user of strawmen to boot. |
|
|
|
Post by Equivocal on Mar 27, 2023 5:26:53 GMT
zany using profanaties who would have thunked it? You don't know the difference between using a swear word to exaggerate a point and using swear words to describe a person. Probably a bit subtle for you. Indeed, and just look at the loss of dramatic impact when Selznick insisted on changing Mitchell's original, "Look, luv, I don't give two fucks" to "Frankly, my dear,........... |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Mar 27, 2023 6:36:46 GMT
No, just the one that Zany knows. Ah, the voice in his head. That explains it. Dear old Zany, he cares you know. Even if he has absolutely no idea what he's caring about. Can I have a link to your news filter. The one that creates the lovely world you live in. Only all the MSN say the Met are institutionally racist. Even Met Police commissioner Rowley privately admits force is institutionally racist despite public denials. |
|
|
|
Post by zanygame on Mar 27, 2023 6:43:03 GMT
You don't know the difference between using a swear word to exaggerate a point and using swear words to describe a person. Probably a bit subtle for you. You are a typical hypocriticle remnant. But I would expect no more from a bumburgh deciple who is as subtle as a fart in an elevator. And a blatant user of strawmen to boot. That's it, well done. Its putting the "You are" at the beginning that makes it a personal insult. I would report it because it encourages others to trash the conversations by filling the threads with this crap, but the Mods are involved in the conversations and do nothing. So this site is destined to follow the last one, which is a shame. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 27, 2023 7:12:48 GMT
You are a typical hypocriticle remnant. But I would expect no more from a bumburgh deciple who is as subtle as a fart in an elevator. And a blatant user of strawmen to boot. That's it, well done. Its putting the "You are" at the beginning that makes it a personal insult. I would report it because it encourages others to trash the conversations by filling the threads with this crap, but the Mods are involved in the conversations and do nothing. So this site is destined to follow the last one, which is a shame. Your the one that started it...Like I stated your are just another remnant hypocritical lefty. |
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Mar 27, 2023 7:35:50 GMT
You are a typical hypocriticle remnant. But I would expect no more from a bumburgh deciple who is as subtle as a fart in an elevator. And a blatant user of strawmen to boot. That's it, well done. Its putting the "You are" at the beginning that makes it a personal insult. I would report it because it encourages others to trash the conversations by filling the threads with this crap, but the Mods are involved in the conversations and do nothing. So this site is destined to follow the last one, which is a shame.
Is flouncing imminent? |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Mar 27, 2023 8:06:24 GMT
Moderator note -
All posters should be aware that you should not insult other posters gratuitously. I think some of this is going to happen now and then because we all have flaws and late nights, but, if you are only posting to insult someone you should first reflect on the possibility you could be reported and, if this happens a lot, it can wear out the moderators and cause your account to be suspended for few days.
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 27, 2023 9:43:34 GMT
You are a typical hypocriticle remnant. But I would expect no more from a bumburgh deciple who is as subtle as a fart in an elevator. And a blatant user of strawmen to boot. That's it, well done. Its putting the "You are" at the beginning that makes it a personal insult. I would report it because it encourages others to trash the conversations by filling the threads with this crap, but the Mods are involved in the conversations and do nothing. So this site is destined to follow the last one, which is a shame. FFS ZG stop blubbing. Responding to a post you disagree with/don't like is not a legal requirement. |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Mar 27, 2023 9:53:10 GMT
Zany is not the subject of this conversation - back on track pls
|
|
|
|
Post by patman post on Mar 27, 2023 10:11:18 GMT
There were 6,192 police officers licensed to carry firearms in England and Wales as of 2022. Firearms officers are in several units, not just one branch.
Where firearms support is needed, it is carried out by specially trained and accredited firearms officers known as authorised firearms officers (AFOs).
In the Met, firearms support is primarily provided by MO19 Specialist Firearms Command. There are also firearms officers in a number of other units, such as Aviation Policing, Royalty and Specialist Protection Command, and the Parliamentary and Diplomatic Protection Command.
There are multiple levels of armed officers. Officers undergo rigorous selection and training to become a firearms officer. Their initial, and continued training, is dependent on the role they’re operationally required to perform. All training is governed by the College of Policing’s ‘National Police Firearms Training Curriculum’ (NPFTC). The curriculum, in tandem with the Met’s chief firearms instructor, ensures that the relevant training modules are completed by all officers within their specific role profile.
All this is stated by the Met:
Yeah, yeah - I know all that.
Now can you tell us who the gung-ho, Dirty Harry types are, please?I don't think you did know all that (or you may have forgotten) — otherwise why did you post:
Who are they then? Can you name some? And do you realise that firearms is already a separate branch?
The gung-ho Dirty Harry types are like those who were so hyped up they slaughtered Jean Charles de Menezes by shooting him seven times in the head.
Their actions were so bad that an Old Bailey jury ruled that London’s Metropolitan Police had broken health and safety laws and unnecessarily put the public at risk in the hours before shooting Jean Charles de Menezes, an innocent Brazilian electrician, who was mistaken for a suicide bomber and shot dead at Stockwell Tube station the day after the failed 21 July bombings in 2005.
Not only that, the Met closeted the firearms officers together after the shooting to agree their statements before being questioned. The met also made false allegations about the clothing and the way De Menezes made his way to Stockwell and on to the tube. The Met also produced a doctored composite photo of De Menezes and terrorist Hussain Osman to excuse the killing...
|
|
