|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 11, 2023 15:59:29 GMT
It was a joke Steve 🙄. Vinny Jones is being lined up for the job . 👍 Nah Des UKIP Lynam with Matt le Tissier as pundit Yup. They can claim that Starmer is like Stalin with the full support of you lefties , right? |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 11, 2023 16:03:01 GMT
So you can't answer the question Red. Well nothing new there then Oh do stop blubbing you big girls blouse. Anyone who describes the BBC as a 'Tory owned broadcaster' deserves to be laughed at. LOL. |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Mar 11, 2023 16:12:18 GMT
So you can't answer the question Red. Well nothing new there then Oh do stop blubbing you big girls blouse. Anyone who describes the BBC as a 'Tory owned broadcaster' deserves to be laughed at. LOL. No if you understood English you would have seen I asked if it had become such? But with former Tory candidate and local party chairman Tim Davie as Director General and loans for Boris fixer Richard Sharp as Chairman it does rather look like they are owned doesn't it And your pathetic attempts to divert off the issue of no action on Alan Sugars numerous pro Tory angry man tweets are noted. We know why you won't answer. |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 11, 2023 16:14:52 GMT
Oh do stop blubbing you big girls blouse. Anyone who describes the BBC as a 'Tory owned broadcaster' deserves to be laughed at. LOL. No if you understood English you would have seen I asked if it had become such? But with former Tory candidate and local party chairman Tim Davie as Director General and loans for Boris fixer Richard Sharp as Chairman it does rather look like they are owned doesn't it And your pathetic attempts to divert off the issue of no action on Alan Sugars numerous pro Tory angry man tweets are noted. We know why you won't answer. Come back when Sugar tweets a claim that Starmer is very much like Stalin. |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Mar 11, 2023 16:17:17 GMT
No if you understood English you would have seen I asked if it had become such? But with former Tory candidate and local party chairman Tim Davie as Director General and loans for Boris fixer Richard Sharp as Chairman it does rather look like they are owned doesn't it And your pathetic attempts to divert off the issue of no action on Alan Sugars numerous pro Tory angry man tweets are noted. We know why you won't answer. Come back when Sugar tweets a claim that Starmer is very much like Stalin. Well there is this  |
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 11, 2023 16:19:13 GMT
Come back when Sugar tweets a claim that Starmer is very much like Stalin. Well there is this Yup. Sack him. Did he tweet this before the new director general? If not, that’s a different matter. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 11, 2023 16:20:04 GMT
Oh do stop blubbing you big girls blouse. Anyone who describes the BBC as a 'Tory owned broadcaster' deserves to be laughed at. LOL. No if you understood English you would have seen I asked if it had become such? But with former Tory candidate and local party chairman Tim Davie as Director General and loans for Boris fixer Richard Sharp as Chairman it does rather look like they are owned doesn't it And your pathetic attempts to divert off the issue of no action on Alan Sugars numerous pro Tory angry man tweets are noted. We know why you won't answer. I understood what you said, which was: ' Because it's become the Tory owned broadcaster perchance'. That's pretty unoquivocal, assuming you understand English. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 11, 2023 16:22:38 GMT
This is so predictable, so routine it's almost boring. Steve the appeaser sticking up for the left wing BBC. I mean come on honestly, hands up who's surprised...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2023 18:21:59 GMT
By implication, that means you believe the BBC can only be the mouthpiece of the state and have on its discussion programmes people from an approved list of vetted candidates who won't rock the boat.
Sounds more like policy from China, North Korea, or Russia...
No it doesn't. It means, if you work for the BBC and are a publicly recognisable figure, you have to keep a substantial part of your private opinions, to yourself. I think everyone understands this, but those who seem to hate this country do seem to be incredibly dishonest. It's like I said earlier, people can still follow him around and nobody is trying to silence him on Twitter or elsewhere. It was the fact that he was repetitively spreading political propaganda whilst believing he's above everyone else at the BBC (an egotistic hypocritie and, erm, git).
Brendan, who is more genuinely liberal than everyone at the BBC combined, may educate him:
|
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Mar 11, 2023 18:50:31 GMT
Good link, B4. Thanks
|
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Mar 11, 2023 18:50:32 GMT
This is so predictable, so routine it's almost boring. Steve the appeaser sticking up for the left wing BBC. I mean come on honestly, hands up who's surprised... Fuck off misrepresenting me. Even a one eyed drunkard could see I'm not 'sticking up for the BBC' here |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 11, 2023 18:51:43 GMT
This is so predictable, so routine it's almost boring. Steve the appeaser sticking up for the left wing BBC. I mean come on honestly, hands up who's surprised... Fuck off misrepresenting me. Even a one eyed drunkard could see I'm not 'sticking up for the BBC' here LOL, I sense I may have hit a nerve. |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Mar 11, 2023 18:53:51 GMT
No it doesn't. It means, if you work for the BBC and are a publicly recognisable figure, you have to keep a substantial part of your private opinions, to yourself. I think everyone understands this, but those who seem to hate this country do seem to be incredibly dishonest. It's like I said earlier, people can still follow him around and nobody is trying to silence him on Twitter or elsewhere. It was the fact that he was repetitively spreading political propaganda whilst believing he's above everyone else at the BBC (an egotistic hypocritie and, erm, git).
Brendan, who is more genuinely liberal than everyone at the BBC combined, may educate him:
That's to miss the point The issue at hand is the BBC with its Royal Charter as national broadcaster is apparently saying it will not use presenters that are seen disagree with its Chairman and DG's Tory politics (but those that publicly endorse them are just fine) Very corrosive to democracy. |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Mar 11, 2023 18:55:10 GMT
Fuck off misrepresenting me. Even a one eyed drunkard could see I'm not 'sticking up for the BBC' here LOL, I sense I may have hit a nerve. Well it does always distress me to see the dimwitted exposing their dimwittedness and shallow pathetic attempts at bullying |
|
|
|
Post by dodgydave on Mar 11, 2023 18:55:15 GMT
No it doesn't. It means, if you work for the BBC and are a publicly recognisable figure, you have to keep a substantial part of your private opinions, to yourself. I think everyone understands this, but those who seem to hate this country do seem to be incredibly dishonest. It's like I said earlier, people can still follow him around and nobody is trying to silence him on Twitter or elsewhere. It was the fact that he was repetitively spreading political propaganda whilst believing he's above everyone else at the BBC (an egotistic hypocritie and, erm, git).
Brendan, who is more genuinely liberal than everyone at the BBC combined, may educate him:
Pretty much sums up my thoughts. Hate speech (calling people Nazis) is allowed when is suits their morals lol. This may be of interest to you too. Lefties defending a fucking tax dodger haha: order-order.com/2023/03/10/linekers-bbc-defiance-could-be-about-swerving-his-5-million-tax-bill/ |
|
