|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 8, 2023 17:45:42 GMT
Unfortunately for Starmer/Labour illegal boat people might be the deciding factor on who wins the next GE, and it isn't looking good for lefty Labour. The whole frigging lot of em are a bunch of no hopers mate...Blair only got in because he could take a leisurely stroll along the beach whithout going arse over tit in the surf
The illegal boat people are the next generation of Labour voters, the more the merrier as far as Labour are concerned. |
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Mar 8, 2023 18:07:00 GMT
Yes indeed, earlier at PMQ's Sunak made Starmer look like a pro immigration lefty pillock, and it must be said, Starmers pro immigration past is rapidly catching up with him, and he doesn't like it does he. The highlights of todays PMQ's were: 1. Starmer describes all immigration law as, racist. 2. Starmer said it was a mistake to control immigration. 3. Starmer has always voted against tougher asylum laws. 4. The government introduced tougher sentences for people smugglers - Labour opposed it. 5. The government signed a deal with Rwanda - Labour opposed it. 6. The government are attempting to deport foreign offenders - Labour oppose it. And incredibly some people, some deluded people, want Labour in government and Starmer in number 10. I don't know whether to laugh or cry. I don't think Starmer woould ever admit his actions were to protect the incomes of members of his profession. |
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Mar 8, 2023 20:01:10 GMT
The usual lefty swamp will make sure this will never happen.....Along with the so-called HR lawyer parasites.......
Suella Braverman says 100 MILLION could claim UK asylum under current rules as she warns 'criminals are breaking into Britain daily' on 'waves' of Channel boats - and will not stop until they know they will be 'swiftly' removed
Mr Sunak spoke to Rwanda's president Paul Kagame before unveiling his plans, and pledged to continue working with him to ensure their stalled project works.
The Government has paid more than £140million to Rwanda but no flights forcibly carrying migrants to the capital of Kigali have taken off because of legal challenges.
A Downing Street spokeswoman said: 'The leaders committed to continue working together to ensure this important partnership is delivered successfully.'
Migrants entering UK illegally from today will be banned from claiming asylum New law will be 'applied retrospectively' for all channel crossings
Suella Braverman today warned that 100million people could be entitled to asylum in
the UK under current rules as she unveiled a radical overhaul
The PM on PMQ's time had that figure thrown at him by Starmer today, the PM told him he was wrong the Home Sec did not say it, that figure of 100 Million figure came from the UN as that is how many people they claim are on the move world wide |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 9, 2023 6:09:21 GMT
Just pull out of the woke ECHR.... Government to use delay strategy if European Court of Human Rights try to block immigration bill stopping small boat crossings in the Channel Government to implement immigration bill despite any human rights challenges The government are planning to fight any challenges from the European Court of Human Rights which would attempt to block the Prime Minister's new immigration bill banning small boats crossing the Channel. Ministers are putting together a delaying strategy to appeal any ruling the court could make against the UK and to implement the policy anyway during any legal processes. This could help the government avoid having the leave the ECHR in its entirety. Reportedly, government ministers believe that even if a final ruling is made against the UK for implementing the legislation, it is unlikely they will be required to implement the judgement immediately, and could ignore it for several years. This is because figures have suggested that around 40 per cent of leading judgements which are concerned with EU states made in the past decade had not had action taken yet, Whitehall sources told the Times www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11837943/Government-use-delay-strategy-European-Court-Human-Rights-try-block-immigration-bill.html |
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Mar 9, 2023 6:17:29 GMT
Just pull out of the woke ECHR.... Government to use delay strategy if European Court of Human Rights try to block immigration bill stopping small boat crossings in the Channel Government to implement immigration bill despite any human rights challenges The government are planning to fight any challenges from the European Court of Human Rights which would attempt to block the Prime Minister's new immigration bill banning small boats crossing the Channel. Ministers are putting together a delaying strategy to appeal any ruling the court could make against the UK and to implement the policy anyway during any legal processes. This could help the government avoid having the leave the ECHR in its entirety. Reportedly, government ministers believe that even if a final ruling is made against the UK for implementing the legislation, it is unlikely they will be required to implement the judgement immediately, and could ignore it for several years. This is because figures have suggested that around 40 per cent of leading judgements which are concerned with EU states made in the past decade had not had action taken yet, Whitehall sources told the Times www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11837943/Government-use-delay-strategy-European-Court-Human-Rights-try-block-immigration-bill.htmlThew ECHR would not be defending my rights to not want invasion by hundreds of thousands of people that the government needs to spend my money on and/or change my way of life. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 9, 2023 6:23:27 GMT
Just pull out of the woke ECHR.... Government to use delay strategy if European Court of Human Rights try to block immigration bill stopping small boat crossings in the Channel Government to implement immigration bill despite any human rights challenges The government are planning to fight any challenges from the European Court of Human Rights which would attempt to block the Prime Minister's new immigration bill banning small boats crossing the Channel. Ministers are putting together a delaying strategy to appeal any ruling the court could make against the UK and to implement the policy anyway during any legal processes. This could help the government avoid having the leave the ECHR in its entirety. Reportedly, government ministers believe that even if a final ruling is made against the UK for implementing the legislation, it is unlikely they will be required to implement the judgement immediately, and could ignore it for several years. This is because figures have suggested that around 40 per cent of leading judgements which are concerned with EU states made in the past decade had not had action taken yet, Whitehall sources told the Times www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11837943/Government-use-delay-strategy-European-Court-Human-Rights-try-block-immigration-bill.htmlThew ECHR would not be defending my rights to not want invasion by hundreds of thousands of people that the government needs to spend my money on and/or change my way of life. I see micron is now wanting even more money from the UK as tho the frogs haven't had enough to stop this influx into the UK.....I'm sure we can find some volunteers.
|
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Mar 9, 2023 9:05:36 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by sheepy on Mar 9, 2023 9:10:56 GMT
Most likely because common sense long ago left the building. |
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Mar 13, 2023 9:59:05 GMT
Yes indeed, earlier at PMQ's Sunak made Starmer look like a pro immigration lefty pillock, and it must be said, Starmers pro immigration past is rapidly catching up with him, and he doesn't like it does he. The highlights of todays PMQ's were: 1. Starmer describes all immigration law as, racist. 2. Starmer said it was a mistake to control immigration. 3. Starmer has always voted against tougher asylum laws. 4. The government introduced tougher sentences for people smugglers - Labour opposed it. 5. The government signed a deal with Rwanda - Labour opposed it. 6. The government are attempting to deport foreign offenders - Labour oppose it. And incredibly some people, some deluded people, want Labour in government and Starmer in number 10. I don't know whether to laugh or cry. As we are not that far away from the next GE the last thing Labour want is for any new legislation that may actually stem the tide of alleged Asylum Seekers from crossing the Channel being brought in by the Tories , Labour know that should it work the voters will vote for the Tories and not Labour, that is why IMO Labour will not support it, they are that desperate to win the next election. |
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Mar 13, 2023 10:08:42 GMT
Yes indeed, earlier at PMQ's Sunak made Starmer look like a pro immigration lefty pillock, and it must be said, Starmers pro immigration past is rapidly catching up with him, and he doesn't like it does he. The highlights of todays PMQ's were: 1. Starmer describes all immigration law as, racist. 2. Starmer said it was a mistake to control immigration. 3. Starmer has always voted against tougher asylum laws. 4. The government introduced tougher sentences for people smugglers - Labour opposed it. 5. The government signed a deal with Rwanda - Labour opposed it. 6. The government are attempting to deport foreign offenders - Labour oppose it. And incredibly some people, some deluded people, want Labour in government and Starmer in number 10. I don't know whether to laugh or cry. Put it all together and ask yourself, what kind of vested interest does this strongly imply? There is a great deal of money in people trafficking. The whole thing could be easily closed down over a weekend, but has been allowed to continue for years. |
|
|
|
Post by Morgan on Mar 13, 2023 10:14:18 GMT
Yes indeed, earlier at PMQ's Sunak made Starmer look like a pro immigration lefty pillock, and it must be said, Starmers pro immigration past is rapidly catching up with him, and he doesn't like it does he. The highlights of todays PMQ's were: 1. Starmer describes all immigration law as, racist.
2. Starmer said it was a mistake to control immigration. 3. Starmer has always voted against tougher asylum laws. 4. The government introduced tougher sentences for people smugglers - Labour opposed it. 5. The government signed a deal with Rwanda - Labour opposed it. 6. The government are attempting to deport foreign offenders - Labour oppose it. And incredibly some people, some deluded people, want Labour in government and Starmer in number 10. I don't know whether to laugh or cry. As we are not that far away from the next GE the last thing Labour want is for any new legislation that may actually stem the tide of alleged Asylum Seekers from crossing the Channel being brought in by the Tories , Labour know that should it work the voters will vote for the Tories and not Labour, that is why IMO Labour will not support it, they are that desperate to win the next election. |
|
|
|
Post by Morgan on Mar 13, 2023 10:16:50 GMT
Do you have an authoritative link to verify that statement?
|
|
|
|
Post by oracle75 on Mar 13, 2023 10:43:57 GMT
Any new plan offered by the current government will take longer to pass through both Houses and to set up than the Tories have left, not to mention measuring success.
All this stuff is window dressing, more promises they have no way of delivering.
You cant be serious to think the Tories have made any promises that have actually worked out for the improvement of the country...
|
|
|
|
Post by Handyman on Mar 13, 2023 12:34:23 GMT
Do you have an authoritative link to verify that statement? I don't do links for my personal opinion |
|
|
|
Post by Toreador on Mar 13, 2023 17:34:42 GMT
Do you have an authoritative link to verify that statement? I don't do links for my personal opinion Missing links is you then.  |
|
