|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Mar 3, 2023 18:15:31 GMT
Lefties don’t give a shit about the ‘ minorities’ they pretend to champion. Imo they want to destroy every taboo in society so that they can reset it . Meanwhile they want to keep the unbelievers on their back foot , frightened to challenge the leftie hobby horse of today and worried in case they said something deemed as improper in the past .
Is the right answer. As time goes on I realise that lefties are the enemy and far more sinister than I had hitherto considered.
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 3, 2023 18:28:43 GMT
Lefties don’t give a shit about the ‘ minorities’ they pretend to champion. Imo they want to destroy every taboo in society so that they can reset it . Meanwhile they want to keep the unbelievers on their back foot , frightened to challenge the leftie hobby horse of today and worried in case they said something deemed as improper in the past .
Is the right answer. As time goes on I realise that lefties are the enemy and far more sinister than I had hitherto considered.
They represent everything that is wrong in this country, and the rot first set-in the last time Labour were in power under Blair, they've been left to fester for 13 years now, and they need to be extinguished before they do any more damage.
|
|
|
Post by Bentley on Mar 3, 2023 18:42:18 GMT
Lefties don’t give a shit about the ‘ minorities’ they pretend to champion. Imo they want to destroy every taboo in society so that they can reset it . Meanwhile they want to keep the unbelievers on their back foot , frightened to challenge the leftie hobby horse of today and worried in case they said something deemed as improper in the past .
Is the right answer. As time goes on I realise that lefties are the enemy and far more sinister than I had hitherto considered.
I think that many of them don’t even know it . They are latter day religious zealots that would willingly burn the unbeliever for the unbelievers own good.
|
|
|
Post by The Squeezed Middle on Mar 3, 2023 18:52:02 GMT
Yep. See my signature below.
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Mar 3, 2023 20:33:36 GMT
Ok
This is where i start by saying i didn’t come here to make friends.
I have no idea what went on here. Can i switch to a show i’ve seen and can comment upon ?
A few months ago we went to the Bristol Hippodrome to watch Bat Out Of Hell : The musical.
We took our grand daughter Melissa along with her mum, her aunt and her new uncle my son in law
Melissa is Twelve
But she is twelve going on 19, looks like a bloody greek goddess and i fear taking her to Spain where the age of consent is 14
She is let us not muck about a child actress its what she wants to do for a living she’s taking a lead role in the musical theatre kids performance of ‘Sister Act’ as one of the main supporting actresses playing one of the other Sister Mary’s, knows EXACTLY ehst makes a Nun a Nun and knows EXACTLY why you need a 16 year old to PLAY Tallulah in Bugsy Malone because North Carolina at the time the play and film are set had that as an age limit which is why the song says Talullah did her training in North Carolina….
So during ‘Paradise By The Dashboard Light’ the lead couple are cavorting horizontally in this open top Cadillac, and at the end both stand up most theatrically as the final power chord is played, her in that lacy lingerie fishnets and heels i personally associate with ‘moulin rouge’, HIM in … sod all except a two foot long padded furry jockstrap.
ALL the women in the audience screamed ‘GET IT OFF’
Including Melissa’s mum
She … buried her head in my shoulder and asked later about the performance said ‘WELL it might have been a BIT inappropriate’
Is she permanently damaged by tbis
Like hell she is.
BUT would i have taken her to see that a year or two back ?
Fuck NO!!!!
So here is the REAL point here.
At what age would an infant try to interpret what they saw at a performance of the kind these mothers came to. I’d really like to know what some child psychologist would say. The sort who say its unwise to have them anywhere near mum when you jump on her to do something about getting her a baby brother or sister.
Because that’s the thing really. Are any of those babies actually going to remember any of that ?
I don’t KNOW the answer. I’d be interested to hear if any professionals engage in the backdraft from this.
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 4, 2023 6:11:25 GMT
Family 'mortified' after being thrown out of Mother Goose panto for bringing their baby with them, after venue staff called security and escorted them out of the theatre The family passed 'multiple' members of staff with their baby without an issue John Goddard's wife was left in tears as security escorted them out of the theatre The conditions on the AMG website read 'babes in arms (children under 18 months) shall be admitted free of charge to those events they may attend (children's shows and Pantomimes only)'. Staff then called security and the family was taken into the foyer. www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11817947/Family-mortified-thrown-Mother-Goose-panto-bringing-baby.html
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Mar 4, 2023 11:24:34 GMT
Apologies Jonksy, just noticed this thread. I started the same thread after you. I'd delete it but others have commented and it would make their posts look pretty daft. Not to worry, it happens.
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Mar 4, 2023 11:45:54 GMT
Because that’s the thing really. Are any of those babies actually going to remember any of that I don’t KNOW the answer. I’d be interested to hear if any professionals engage in the backdraft from this. Consciously - probably not. However, a child of that age will emotionally normalise anything it is exposed to regularly. Do you want to live in a society where ball gags / bondage and fetish gear are normalised? Some people certainly do and that's their likely motive here. As one advocate put it - the idea is to spill so much glitter in the carpet, society can't get it out
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Mar 4, 2023 12:26:29 GMT
Apologies Jonksy, just noticed this thread. I started the same thread after you. I'd delete it but others have commented and it would make their posts look pretty daft. Not to worry, it happens. Not a problem mate....Like I have stated prior great minds think alike.....I am as bad as the next man for starting a topic that is already in debate...LOL....I like to think it is the human factor....LOL
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Mar 4, 2023 13:59:36 GMT
Because that’s the thing really. Are any of those babies actually going to remember any of that I don’t KNOW the answer. I’d be interested to hear if any professionals engage in the backdraft from this. Consciously - probably not. However, a child of that age will emotionally normalise anything it is exposed to regularly. Do you want to live in a society where ball gags / bondage and fetish gear are normalised? Some people certainly do and that's their likely motive here. As one advocate put it - the idea is to spill so much glitter in the carpet, society can't get it outAnd that’s a fair point. The answer is NO i don’t want to live in a society where it is considered the norm to wander down the streets wearing it snd parading yourself as an instruction manual on how to use it, but then again i’m a child of the baby boomer generation for whom the great outdoors had no CCTV or police helicopters with FLIR capturing my antics with my girlfriend from five miles away. And perhaps as I’ve got older and ibuprofen is a more important and relevant pharmaceutical than the contraceptive pill, maybe my attitude has broadened. I might once have thought those using such ‘stage props’ rather weird… today i’m more ‘well whatever turns you on once your front door is closed, knock yourself out’ I doubt one such experience is likely to impact a child yet to be weaned onto solid food, but as you yourself say, and i agree, REGULAR exposure is another thing…
|
|
|
Post by Orac on Mar 4, 2023 14:24:39 GMT
Consciously - probably not. However, a child of that age will emotionally normalise anything it is exposed to regularly. Do you want to live in a society where ball gags / bondage and fetish gear are normalised? Some people certainly do and that's their likely motive here. As one advocate put it - the idea is to spill so much glitter in the carpet, society can't get it outI doubt one such experience is likely to impact a child yet to be weaned onto solid food, but as you yourself say, and i agree, REGULAR exposure is another thing… Sure. However, the notion that children will be rationed to one such experience each came from you, rather than the proponents. Lets see where the line is . Do you think a daily exposure to fettish and bondage gear of half an hour for three years is okay?
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Mar 4, 2023 15:15:35 GMT
I doubt one such experience is likely to impact a child yet to be weaned onto solid food, but as you yourself say, and i agree, REGULAR exposure is another thing… Sure. However, the notion that children will be rationed to one such experience each came from you, rather than the proponents. Lets see where the line is . Do you think a daily exposure to fettish and bondage gear of half an hour for three years is okay? Certainly not. And neither will social services. Although they rather like the idea of ensuring children are forced to gain ‘knowledge beyond their years’ through exposure to ‘sex education material’ produced by the Dept of Education. Such allegations work wonders at keeping parents on a knife edge. We had a run in with those scum about six years ago and they lost, but only because Sarah had a contract as a classroom assistant requiring her to teach that stuff, and a copy of the book in question, locked away in my office. My solicitor made mincemeat of them. Others without that firepower have not been so lucky.
|
|
|
Post by seniorcitizen007 on Mar 5, 2023 9:09:06 GMT
All forms of sexual experimentation driven by one's imagination rather than one's instinct lead to psychological, social, and physiological dysfunction. The sexual instinct, which is very subtle, needs to be allowed its freedom without interference from the mind. Successful pair-bonding, for life, should be presented as the ideal society should aim for.
In the 70s I lived in a large a squat in Hampstead where there was a gay and a lesbian. They were accepted and not put under any pressure. Both of them gave up their lifestyles and formed heterosexual relationships. I met the lesbian 20 years later and she was happily married with four children. The gay wasn't so successful ... his attempts to settle into a heterosexual relationship were disrupted by flashbacks to his childhood .. to parental interference with his sexual development. When he was in the squat he admitted he was attracted to women ...but was "afraid of them". Things happened in his childhood that made him so. When he was 11 his parents locked him in the bathroom for 3 hours after his school reported that he had been found in a cupboard with a girl.
There used to be a custom in Yorkshire where young teenagers who were showing reluctance to engage with the opposite sex were placed in a bed together ... a boy and girl from different families ... with clothes on that they couldn't remove.
I applied for a sheltered housing flat ... but decided not to move there because the women in charge was a dominant lesbian. I told a gay acquaintence of mine (who is happy being gay) about her. He laughed and said: "I know exactly what you mean". If I had told the housing people why I didn't want to move there I'd probably have got a very different response.
I have no problem with gays and lesbians who are not heterophobic or on a power trip. As for bisexuals .. if find them a right "pain in the neck" with their conviction that their sexual orientation is the way everybody should be (back in the 90s the BBC had ten minute slots between programs where bisexuals were allowed to say exactly this ... we should all be bisexual).
|
|
|
Post by walterpaisley on Mar 5, 2023 11:37:26 GMT
..they need to be extinguished before they do any more damage. I'm hoping you mean "electorally". Or do I need to start worrying?
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Mar 5, 2023 11:45:37 GMT
..they need to be extinguished before they do any more damage. I'm hoping you mean "electorally". Or do I need to start worrying? I said extinguished, not annihilating LOL ... although..
|
|