|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 20, 2023 14:32:46 GMT
If in the future when things are designed and built enough to carry a comms satellite into working orbit, I have to ask why the UK is spending billions reinventing the wheel. The EU already had them circling the earth and helping us get from A to B every day. Brexit got the UK booted out of the more secure European system, known as EGNOS as a result of Brexit. It is also unable to access the secure encrypted signal from the wider European Galileo system.
This is why the UK has launched its own space-based augmentation system that pinpoints locations to aircraft, ships and driverless cars after Brexit meant the UK was ejected from the European alternative...
(ESA)'s Galileo global navigation satellite system is nothing more than a bunch of EUSSR crap. They have recently had to change their algorithm to stop people being diverted to bloody cart tracks and are now only using major hiways for directions along wiith the fucking thing being hacked by terroists every other day....
The newly activated UK “space-based augmentation system” (UKSBAS) works by adding an additional signal to GPS, which is run by the US Government. The extra signal makes it less vulnerable to interference and provides more accuracy, down to a few centimetres rather than several metres.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 20, 2023 14:36:15 GMT
Total rubbish. I may have left the aviation scene but I am still a qaualified certification stamp holder and I have certified AC's for both the FAA and the CAA even since leaving. Military aircraft have less restrictions than commercial Aircraft but still require a form one for certification which is a legal requirement in foriegn airspace.........They do not share the same stringent rules that are paramount for civil AC's. I refer you to the post before yours which comprehensively disproves you ukpoliticsdebate.boards.net/post/59686/thread But then I've worked with Boeing engineers on the mil side and had them explain to me the problems of weapon/aircraft and base aircraft re-certification. The four engine idea goes back a very long time FFS you may have worked for Boeing but not in a certification capacity......FFS you couldn't even explain on the other board on what ceritfication method was even used for your mythical inventions. |
|
|
|
Post by Baron von Lotsov on Feb 20, 2023 16:16:20 GMT
Brexit got the UK booted out of the more secure European system, known as EGNOS as a result of Brexit. It is also unable to access the secure encrypted signal from the wider European Galileo system.
This is why the UK has launched its own space-based augmentation system that pinpoints locations to aircraft, ships and driverless cars after Brexit meant the UK was ejected from the European alternative...
(ESA)'s Galileo global navigation satellite system is nothing more than a bunch of EUSSR crap. They have recently had to change their algorithm to stop people being diverted to bloody cart tracks and are now only using major hiways for directions along wiith the fucking thing being hacked by terroists every other day....
The newly activated UK “space-based augmentation system” (UKSBAS) works by adding an additional signal to GPS, which is run by the US Government. The extra signal makes it less vulnerable to interference and provides more accuracy, down to a few centimetres rather than several metres.
GLONASS and BeiDou were integrated for similar reasons. The more fixes you get the better the accuracy and reliability. |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 20, 2023 17:15:55 GMT
I refer you to the post before yours which comprehensively disproves you ukpoliticsdebate.boards.net/post/59686/thread But then I've worked with Boeing engineers on the mil side and had them explain to me the problems of weapon/aircraft and base aircraft re-certification. The four engine idea goes back a very long time FFS you may have worked for Boeing but not in a certification capacity......FFS you couldn't even explain on the other board on what ceritfication method was even used for your mythical inventions. Oh look he's lying again about that other place - you do seem obsessed with rewriting history to mask your failures Jonksy I never said I worked for Boeing, actually they were my subcontractor for a while. And you were the one who preposterously said EASA were not able to issue waivers for their own processes despite being shown some. Anyway I mustn't distract you from your muck stirring for brickies, how strange that someone who claims he could have certified military aircraft ends up cold, wet and covered in muck so often. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 20, 2023 19:16:19 GMT
FFS you may have worked for Boeing but not in a certification capacity......FFS you couldn't even explain on the other board on what ceritfication method was even used for your mythical inventions. Oh look he's lying again about that other place - you do seem obsessed with rewriting history to mask your failures Jonksy I never said I worked for Boeing, actually they were my subcontractor for a while. And you were the one who preposterously said EASA were not able to issue waivers for their own processes despite being shown some. Anyway I mustn't distract you from your muck stirring for brickies, how strange that someone who claims he could have certified military aircraft ends up cold, wet and covered in muck so often. You know jack shit about aviation certification......Yet another of your bullshit statements that you think is your entitlement. And as for me being a bricky at least it is honest and I enjoy the luxury of not signing my life away every fucking time I do up a nut or put in a cotter pin......I have certified more aircraft than you have had hot dnners..FFS.....You know full well that I started my working life as a bricky and I chose to go back to it when I knew aviation was toast during the pandemic and could go back to aviation any time I felt the need to do so..So keep digging as you enjoy making a total prat of yourself. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2023 19:21:10 GMT
The willy waving is getting a bit boring. Why don't some people discuss the topic instead of each other.
Any chance ??
|
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 20, 2023 19:29:25 GMT
The willy waving is getting a bit boring. Why don't some people discuss the topic instead of each other. Any chance It's not willy waving, it's a sad liar from Devon telling lie after lie after lie and when he makes it personal I ain't always going to back away from pointing out how shabby that is. Come on do you really believe a guy who mixes muck for a living knows jack shit about how to certify a nuclear bomber as fit for such flying? |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 20, 2023 19:34:19 GMT
The willy waving is getting a bit boring. Why don't some people discuss the topic instead of each other. Any chance It wouldn't be so bad if some fuckwits knew what they were talking about and discussing the topic rather than waffling and making bullshit statements.......A certain member stated that UK civil aviation would be grounded because if we left the EUSSR we would be forced out of EASA....Not mentioning any names of course......Just more remainer bullshit to try their usual scare tactics......Funny enough the UK aviation was grounded along with every other country on the globe due to the pandemic and still hasn't fully recovered 100%. |
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Feb 20, 2023 19:37:03 GMT
Wouldn't an 8 engined aircraft also have to be recertified?
They are after all a different engine entirely and I would assume large bits of the nacelles would have to be redesigned as the fuel delivery system would have to connect in different places.
Different thrust would require new connecting points rated to be able to cope with the force and transfer it through the pylon without deformation. And can the spars of the aircraft cope with the extra thrust ? I would assume that at some point the B52's may need new wing spars due to fatigue life limitations.
|
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 20, 2023 19:37:38 GMT
A reminder of the unprovoked lie loaded shite from Jonksy that started this All conditional on getting to be lead contractor in a £6B UK military programme so has to be on UK soil. And a bloody good boost for UK industry..... I can Remember when you tried to make out Rolls Royce in the USA was American owned when they won the lucrative order of supplying and building the engines for the mighty B52 fleet..... Any excuse to see the negative for this country and you and the other UK traitors are there in a flash.....We are so much better now we are free of the EUSSR's clutches......Onwards and upwards for the UK from now on despite the arseholes who want to destroy our country and see our lives controlled by a faceless unaccountable bunch of areseholes in Brussels. Buy hey ho it's the sort of wankery so many in charge of this forum think is just fine and dandy |
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 20, 2023 19:42:56 GMT
Wouldn't an 8 engined aircraft also have to be recertified? They are after all a different engine entirely and I would assume large bits of the nacelles would have to be redesigned as the fuel delivery system would have to connect in different places. Different thrust would require new connecting points rated to be able to cope with the force and transfer it through the pylon without deformation. And can the spars of the aircraft cope with the extra thrust I would assume that at some point the B52's may need new wing spars due to fatigue life limitations. Not so much because the size, weight and aero footprint of these new engines are a good match for what's there already RB211 diameter ~2 metres J57 diameter ~ 1 metre And that is just one of the BIG differences, see also the link posted earlier for more detail |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 20, 2023 19:50:28 GMT
Wouldn't an 8 engined aircraft also have to be recertified? They are after all a different engine entirely and I would assume large bits of the nacelles would have to be redesigned as the fuel delivery system would have to connect in different places. Different thrust would require new connecting points rated to be able to cope with the force and transfer it through the pylon without deformation. And can the spars of the aircraft cope with the extra thrust I would assume that at some point the B52's may need new wing spars due to fatigue life limitations. All military Aircraft have to be certified regardles of how many engines they use. The B52's have always been powered by 8 engines from day one of their commision....The 8 engines are in two double pods per wing....The only time that certification by the FAA was over ruled by the military was in the Vietnam war when they were bombing Hanoi as the FAA were obliged by aviation law to pass on the information to civil aircraft in the vicinity of the airspace over Hanoi and of course then the North vienemese could mass their SAMS by the times that were given out by the FAA. So the military stopped providing the flight times for bombings for obviouse reasons.....A practise that is still currently in use today......why devulge your intentions to an enemy? |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Feb 20, 2023 19:55:22 GMT
Wouldn't an 8 engined aircraft also have to be recertified? They are after all a different engine entirely and I would assume large bits of the nacelles would have to be redesigned as the fuel delivery system would have to connect in different places. Different thrust would require new connecting points rated to be able to cope with the force and transfer it through the pylon without deformation. And can the spars of the aircraft cope with the extra thrust I would assume that at some point the B52's may need new wing spars due to fatigue life limitations. Not so much because the size, weight and aero footprint of these new engines are a good match for what's there already RB211 diameter ~2 metres J57 diameter ~ 1 metre And that is just one of the BIG differences, see also the link posted earlier for more detail What the fuck has that got to do with it.....Aero engines have progressed since the first B52's were created and smaller units now are far more powerfull than the large lumps they used to be..The J57 was introduced in the 50's we have progressed in leaps and bounds since then.....FFS the J157's didn't even have afterurn. |
|
|
|
Post by Montegriffo on Feb 20, 2023 19:59:33 GMT
A reminder of the unprovoked lie loaded shite from Jonksy that started this And a bloody good boost for UK industry..... I can Remember when you tried to make out Rolls Royce in the USA was American owned when they won the lucrative order of supplying and building the engines for the mighty B52 fleet..... Any excuse to see the negative for this country and you and the other UK traitors are there in a flash.....We are so much better now we are free of the EUSSR's clutches......Onwards and upwards for the UK from now on despite the arseholes who want to destroy our country and see our lives controlled by a faceless unaccountable bunch of areseholes in Brussels. Buy hey ho it's the sort of wankery so many in charge of this forum think is just fine and dandy If Jonsky's posts really bother you that much Steve I recommend the block function. |
|
|
|
Post by Pacifico on Feb 20, 2023 22:31:26 GMT
Wouldn't an 8 engined aircraft also have to be recertified? Yes - of course. Any major change to the original type certificate needs recertification. |
|
