|
Post by Vinny on Feb 9, 2023 22:28:29 GMT
No, he lives in yours, I barely give that old wrinkled prune a thought in the week, never mind the day.
But you, you're obsessed.
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 10, 2023 1:29:00 GMT
I am getting tired of smart-alec aggressive bullshit from you and the others who don't know what they are talking about. What taxes would I be talking about if not those related to GDP? Income tax? National insurance? VAT? Inheritance tax? Corporation tax? No. I referred to all taxation relative to GDP, or what people pay on general productivity. As for military spending, the official graph tells you that more numbers might be invested in the military but less as part of GDP. For decades I am getting really tired of aggressive profanity being spewed out of the mouth of babes. Who play semantics, gotchas and cut and paste lies. And who believe anything Murdoch wants you to believe. It is sad to see the power of the unelected media who shape politics. You can squawk sovereignty as much as you like. Murdoch still lives in your head. No you're getting distressed by reality and people quoting facts at you to challenge your delusions. You need to seek professional help
|
|
|
Post by oracle75 on Feb 10, 2023 7:26:26 GMT
You need to stop second guessing and throwing personal comments about. Then you might understand how to stay on topic.
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Feb 10, 2023 7:33:59 GMT
[Officer Crabtree]Good moaning!
|
|
|
Post by oracle75 on Feb 10, 2023 7:35:55 GMT
If you are going to deny what I wrote, this is what you should be discussing. So let's have your analysis of UK tax rates relative to its GDP, compared to other countries. And the clear graph which shows that while the government put more money into the military it has progressively been a smaller and smaller percentage of taxes raised on national GDP, so in context, has invested less and less over years. And stop the infantile personal attacks. If six year old level of conversation is the best you can do, don't bother.
|
|
|
Post by oracle75 on Feb 10, 2023 7:37:30 GMT
I am getting tired of smart-alec aggressive bullshit from you and the others who don't know what they are talking about. What taxes would I be talking about if not those related to GDP? Income tax? National insurance? VAT? Inheritance tax? Corporation tax? No. I referred to all taxation relative to GDP, or what people pay on general productivity. As for military spending, the official graph tells you that more numbers might be invested in the military but less as part of GDP. For decades I am getting really tired of aggressive profanity being spewed out of the mouth of babes. Who play semantics, gotchas and cut and paste lies. And who believe anything Murdoch wants you to believe. It is sad to see the power of the unelected media who shape politics. You can squawk sovereignty as much as you like. Murdoch still lives in your head. No you're getting distressed by reality and people quoting facts at you to challenge your delusions. You need to seek professional help So far no one has quoted any relevant facts which address the subject. I am still waiting.
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Feb 10, 2023 7:58:13 GMT
You have no idea what the UK economy would be doing now had we voted to stay instead of leave. It's all emotion, get over it Kim.
Do not try to cherry pick statistics to suit your ego.
Many a place in the EU has worse inflation and worse living costs and higher unemployment than the UK.
Good day to you.
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Feb 10, 2023 10:25:37 GMT
If you are going to deny what I wrote, this is what you should be discussing. So let's have your analysis of UK tax rates relative to its GDP, compared to other countries. And the clear graph which shows that while the government put more money into the military it has progressively been a smaller and smaller percentage of taxes raised on national GDP, so in context, has invested less and less over years. And stop the infantile personal attacks. If six year old level of conversation is the best you can do, don't bother. What's that got to do with Brexit - military spending?
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 10, 2023 10:40:06 GMT
No you're getting distressed by reality and people quoting facts at you to challenge your delusions. You need to seek professional help So far no one has quoted any relevant facts which address the subject. I am still waiting. read my posts above and the links in them You made a load of false suppositions to back your position
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Feb 10, 2023 10:49:33 GMT
UK economy grew by 4% in 2022 well above #IMF prediction and despite 0.5% hit from strikers in December. 🇬🇧 was the fastest growing economy in the #G7 last year.
L Fox.
Ouch.
|
|
|
Post by oracle75 on Feb 10, 2023 11:23:49 GMT
UK economy grew by 4% in 2022 well above #IMF prediction and despite 0.5% hit from strikers in December. 🇬🇧 was the fastest growing economy in the #G7 last year. L Fox. Ouch. Will the UK economy have the slowest growth in G7 next year IMF says? The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has warned that the UK faces the slowest rate of growth in the G7 next year. The IMF predicts that UK economic growth will fall to 0.5% in 2023, which is considerably lower than its previous prediction of 1.2%, which was forecast in April. www.maxwellsaccountants.co.uk › ... IMF warns UK is set for slowest rate of growth of G7 countries
|
|
|
Post by Vinny on Feb 10, 2023 11:26:41 GMT
|
|
|
Post by oracle75 on Feb 10, 2023 11:33:29 GMT
So far no one has quoted any relevant facts which address the subject. I am still waiting. read my posts above and the links in them You made a load of false suppositions to back your position I replied to the two links you posted. And proved both wrong because they were not relative to GDP. Nor have you defended your assertions with figures relative to GDP. It is no good saying you grew because you put a hundred million into the military when your economy grew by say 10 percent. You ar cutting a smaller piece of a growing pie and saying you are growing the military. Whatever figures you want to quote cannot be divorced from the country's GDP. It is a common lie told by politicians who tell you how much they have spent on something while never telling you how that compares to last year or what size of the pie that is. And next time you think about replying, I just laugh when you think telling someone they are wrong is not backed up by links. Just who do you think you are when you don't even understand the basics of economics and spend your life in here defending the indefensible with unsupported rubbish.
|
|
|
Post by oracle75 on Feb 10, 2023 11:38:11 GMT
UK economy grew by 4% in 2022 well above #IMF prediction and despite 0.5% hit from strikers in December. 🇬🇧 was the fastest growing economy in the #G7 last year. L Fox. Ouch. Will the UK economy have the slowest growth in G7 next year IMF says? The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has warned that the UK faces the slowest rate of growth in the G7 next year. The IMF predicts that UK economic growth will fall to 0.5% in 2023, which is considerably lower than its previous prediction of 1.2%, which was forecast in April. www.maxwellsaccountants.co.uk › ... IMF warns UK is set for slowest rate of growth of G7 countries BTW today's economic news is that the UK economy narrowly missed recession (two consecutive quarters of negative growth) last year because the economy is flatlining. Again no link so I am unimpressed with your "facts".
|
|
|
Post by Steve on Feb 10, 2023 12:23:08 GMT
read my posts above and the links in them You made a load of false suppositions to back your position I replied to the two links you posted. And proved both wrong because they were not relative to GDP. Nor have you defended your assertions with figures relative to GDP. It is no good saying you grew because you put a hundred million into the military when your economy grew by say 10 percent. You ar cutting a smaller piece of a growing pie and saying you are growing the military. Whatever figures you want to quote cannot be divorced from the country's GDP. It is a common lie told by politicians who tell you how much they have spent on something while never telling you how that compares to last year or what size of the pie that is. And next time you think about replying, I just laugh when you think telling someone they are wrong is not backed up by links. Just who do you think you are when you don't even understand the basics of economics and spend your life in here defending the indefensible with unsupported rubbish. All you proved was when proven wrong you move the goalposts and pretend you posted about spend:GDP when actually you posted about 'budget' You are the unacceptable face of remain and leave's best recruiting sergeant. Please don't post again
|
|