|
|
Post by jonksy on Jan 16, 2023 5:35:22 GMT
Did he ever have it in the first place?.....It makes a change to see an interviewer on the brussels broad casting company challenge a leftie.
Stammer fired back at BBC's Laura Kuenssberg after she confronted him over his broken promises as leader of the Labour Party. In a fiery interview, Ms Kuenssberg questioned whether the public could trust Sir Keir given his U-turns on policies from the NHS to tuition fees. The Labour leader appeared to lose it at one point, insisting that the BBC host was simply "not right".
Ms Kuenssberg said: "Do you want people to trust you?
"This is about you making commitments and then changing your mind."
Sir Keir responded: "I'm not sure you're right to assume the public will say that they prefer someone who dogmatically insists whatever the position was before can never change."
The BBC political host remarked on Sir Keir's "ruthlessness" as party leader, adding: "Part of that ruthlessness has been junking promises you made to your party.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2023 6:54:29 GMT
Did he ever have it in the first place?.....It makes a change to see an interviewer on the brussels broad casting company challenge a leftie.
Stammer fired back at BBC's Laura Kuenssberg after she confronted him over his broken promises as leader of the Labour Party. In a fiery interview, Ms Kuenssberg questioned whether the public could trust Sir Keir given his U-turns on policies from the NHS to tuition fees. The Labour leader appeared to lose it at one point, insisting that the BBC host was simply "not right".
Ms Kuenssberg said: "Do you want people to trust you?
"This is about you making commitments and then changing your mind."
Sir Keir responded: "I'm not sure you're right to assume the public will say that they prefer someone who dogmatically insists whatever the position was before can never change."
The BBC political host remarked on Sir Keir's "ruthlessness" as party leader, adding: "Part of that ruthlessness has been junking promises you made to your party.
I was in the party at the time he became leader. Many of us always suspected he was lying to us with his false promises. But there were enough gullible prats in the party who fell for his lies. You could tell he was lying simply by seeing who all his backers and supporters were. And if he could lie so blatantly to his own members to get elected, he can do it to the wider electorate. He is a man whose word is not to be trusted, with a proven track record of making false promises to get elected. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 16, 2023 9:35:48 GMT
Did he ever have it in the first place?.....It makes a change to see an interviewer on the brussels broad casting company challenge a leftie.
Stammer fired back at BBC's Laura Kuenssberg after she confronted him over his broken promises as leader of the Labour Party. In a fiery interview, Ms Kuenssberg questioned whether the public could trust Sir Keir given his U-turns on policies from the NHS to tuition fees. The Labour leader appeared to lose it at one point, insisting that the BBC host was simply "not right".
Ms Kuenssberg said: "Do you want people to trust you?
"This is about you making commitments and then changing your mind."
Sir Keir responded: "I'm not sure you're right to assume the public will say that they prefer someone who dogmatically insists whatever the position was before can never change."
The BBC political host remarked on Sir Keir's "ruthlessness" as party leader, adding: "Part of that ruthlessness has been junking promises you made to your party.
Kuenssberg's Tory DNA shows through again. |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Jan 16, 2023 9:40:41 GMT
Did he ever have it in the first place?.....It makes a change to see an interviewer on the brussels broad casting company challenge a leftie.
Stammer fired back at BBC's Laura Kuenssberg after she confronted him over his broken promises as leader of the Labour Party. In a fiery interview, Ms Kuenssberg questioned whether the public could trust Sir Keir given his U-turns on policies from the NHS to tuition fees. The Labour leader appeared to lose it at one point, insisting that the BBC host was simply "not right".
Ms Kuenssberg said: "Do you want people to trust you?
"This is about you making commitments and then changing your mind."
Sir Keir responded: "I'm not sure you're right to assume the public will say that they prefer someone who dogmatically insists whatever the position was before can never change."
The BBC political host remarked on Sir Keir's "ruthlessness" as party leader, adding: "Part of that ruthlessness has been junking promises you made to your party.
Kuenssberg's Tory DNA shows through again. What, to ask a would-be PM difficult questions? |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Jan 16, 2023 9:56:49 GMT
Kuenssberg's Tory DNA shows through again. 😂 |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 16, 2023 10:06:39 GMT
Kuenssberg's Tory DNA shows through again. What, to ask a would-be PM difficult questions? No, by imposing her own insinuations onto the "would-be PM". IMO, regardless of political persuasion of the person being interviewed an interviewer should be looking for clarification not insinuating guilt. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 16, 2023 10:08:23 GMT
Kuenssberg's Tory DNA shows through again. 😂 An idiot with no words ^^ |
|
|
|
Post by buccaneer on Jan 16, 2023 10:10:57 GMT
What, to ask a would-be PM difficult questions? No, by imposing her own insinuations onto the "would-be PM". IMO, regardless of political persuasion of the person being interviewed an interviewer should be looking for clarification not insinuating guilt. That's what the interviewer did. She was looking for clarification over what Starmer said and what he would do, as they were contradictory. |
|
|
|
Post by Red Rackham on Jan 16, 2023 10:13:21 GMT
An idiot with no words ^^ 😂 |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jan 16, 2023 10:28:40 GMT
Kuenssberg's Tory DNA shows through again. What, to ask a would-be PM difficult questions? If you asked him a direct question .. 'are you a liar'?
and he replied "yes"
we still wouldn't believe him lol
|
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 16, 2023 10:33:46 GMT
No, by imposing her own insinuations onto the "would-be PM". IMO, regardless of political persuasion of the person being interviewed an interviewer should be looking for clarification not insinuating guilt. That's what the interviewer did. She was looking for clarification over what Starmer said and what he would do, as they were contradictory. Starmer. Sir Keir responded: " I'm not sure you're right to assume the public will say that they prefer someone who dogmatically insists whatever the position was before can never change." Kuenessburg. The BBC political host remarked on Sir Keir's "ruthlessness" as party leader, adding: "Part of that ruthlessness has been junking promises you made to your party".
She had already had her answer, but dismissed it and replaced it with her own Tory faced OPINION. I would have told her to fuck off, making sure the mike was turned off of course  |
|
|
|
Post by Fairsociety on Jan 16, 2023 10:38:23 GMT
That's what the interviewer did. She was looking for clarification over what Starmer said and what he would do, as they were contradictory. Starmer. Sir Keir responded: " I'm not sure you're right to assume the public will say that they prefer someone who dogmatically insists whatever the position was before can never change." Kuenessburg. The BBC political host remarked on Sir Keir's "ruthlessness" as party leader, adding: "Part of that ruthlessness has been junking promises you made to your party".
She had already had her answer, but dismissed it and replaced it with her own Tory faced OPINION. I would have told her to fuck off, making sure the mike was turned off of course Starmer will jump on any old bandwagon if he thought it got him votes.
He waits to see what the public sway is, then he goes in the direction of the more popular.
It's not gone unnoticed that he's had a public dig at Sunak for using private health care, has he confirmed that he does not use private health care?
His predecessor Blair who lead the path of destruction for the NHS wouldn't be seen dead in a NHS hospital..... typical double standard hypocrisy of the Labour party.
|
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 16, 2023 10:45:33 GMT
Starmer. Sir Keir responded: " I'm not sure you're right to assume the public will say that they prefer someone who dogmatically insists whatever the position was before can never change." Kuenessburg. The BBC political host remarked on Sir Keir's "ruthlessness" as party leader, adding: "Part of that ruthlessness has been junking promises you made to your party".
She had already had her answer, but dismissed it and replaced it with her own Tory faced OPINION. I would have told her to fuck off, making sure the mike was turned off of course Starmer will jump on any old bandwagon if he thought it got him votes.
He waits to see what the public sway is, then he goes in the direction of the more popular.
It's not gone unnoticed that he's had a public dig at Sunak for using private health care, has he confirmed that he does not use private health care?
His predecessor Blair who lead the path of destruction for the NHS wouldn't be seen dead in a NHS hospital..... typical double standard hypocrisy of the Labour party.
It is beyond ridiculous to claim that Blair "lead the path of destruction for the NHS". Posting such an obviously unprovable distortion of reality make your post fit for nothing other than the trash bin. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2023 10:53:50 GMT
Kuenssberg's Tory DNA shows through again. What, to ask a would-be PM difficult questions? Not to mention reasonable ones. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 16, 2023 10:58:45 GMT
What, to ask a would-be PM difficult questions? If you asked him a direct question .. 'are you a liar'?
and he replied "yes"
we still wouldn't believe him lol
If Starmer told me that daylight would arrive tomorrow after a period of darkness overnight, I would have to fact check it from a more reliable source. lol |
|
