|
|
Post by jonksy on Jan 15, 2023 13:34:53 GMT
They were just rules, not the frigging law. So the police didn't investigate then? 🤔 😂🤣 Only because they were pushed into it by the usual loony woke left. Even the MET security officers at No 10 didn’t give a toss about a few bloody drinks. But listening to usuals you would think it was the crime of the frigging century. But of course that’s the usual hipocritical and sanctimonious left. If it were a bloody crime Boris would have received more than a frigging FPN FFS. And what’s even more laughable was that the usuals think that warranted a figging criminal record…You couldn’t make it up how bloody dumb that thought is. And BTW it’s about time you PM’d your boss Steve as you are so far out of your own depth. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 15, 2023 13:38:49 GMT
So the police didn't investigate then? 🤔 😂🤣 Even the MET security officers at No 10 didn’t give a toss about a few bloody drinks. But listening to usuals you would think it was the crime of the frigging century. But of course that’s the usual hipocritical and sanctimonious left. If it were a bloody crime Boris would have received more than a frigging FPN FFS. And what’s even more laughable was that the usuals think that warranted a figging criminal record…You couldn’t make it up how bloody dumb that thought is. Proof please. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jan 15, 2023 13:41:09 GMT
Only because they were pushed into it by the usual loony woke left. Even the MET security officers at No 10 didn’t give a toss about a few bloody drinks. But listening to usuals you would think it was the crime of the frigging century. But of course that’s the usual hipocritical and sanctimonious left. If it were a bloody crime Boris would have received more than a frigging FPN FFS. And what’s even more laughable was that the usuals think that warranted a figging criminal record…You couldn’t make it up how bloody dumb that thought is. Proof please. You wouldn’t know proof if you fell arse over tit on it. I have better things to do on a Sunday afternoon rather than feeding the trolls. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Jan 15, 2023 13:42:00 GMT
None. He just can't construct a reply without saying "lefties wokes". 🙄
|
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jan 15, 2023 13:44:15 GMT
None. He just can't construct a reply without saying "lefties wokes". 🙄 Like I said you are way out of your depth. come back when you are fully armed. Toodle pip and have a nice day. |
|
|
|
Post by andrewbrown on Jan 15, 2023 13:59:01 GMT
None. He just can't construct a reply without saying "lefties wokes". 🙄 Like I said you are way out of your depth. come back when you are fully armed. Toodle pip and have a nice day. Don't think that I'll be taking any advice from someone who comes on a political forum but can't even spell the name of the leader of the opposition. And as for Steve, I think if you trawl my posts that I have hardly ever interacted with him. That's all in your imagination, not anything you've read. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jan 15, 2023 14:03:33 GMT
Like I said you are way out of your depth. come back when you are fully armed. Toodle pip and have a nice day. Don't think that I'll be taking any advice from someone who comes on a political forum but can't even spell the name of the leader of the opposition. And as for Steve, I think if you trawl my posts that I have hardly ever interacted with him. That's all in your imagination, not anything you've read. Yawwwwwwwnnnnn. And don’t think I will argue with idiots who seemed to think they had different voting slip to the rest of us in 2016.. Like I say you are way out of your depth. But if you want to carry on making your self look even more foolish that is your prerogative. |
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Jan 15, 2023 14:41:09 GMT
When is the beer and curry doc-drama being aired?? ......I think Boris will enjoy this, he is a master of debate, far more quick witted than any of his accusers and if this hearing is held in public i believe he will be clearly seen as the victim of a coup constructed by a group of anti-democratic, jealous puritans using the law as a vehicle against democracy.
Row breaks out as broadcasters plan to air Boris Johnson's Partygate hearing live on TV Major broadcasters are likely to air the entirety of Boris Johnson's testimony It will examine whether he misled MPs about law-breaking lockdown parties The former Prime Minister is expected to appear before the cameras next month
Boris, quick-witted?  lol It might surprise you but he is actually very quick on his feet and the thick as two short planks bumbling buffoon act he put on as mayor at the podium was just that. An act. He is, regrettably, not the finest example of intelligentsia but he is quite good at thinking at speed. I had the displeasure of having to deal with him while he was mayor and TFL wanted a travel advice email system invented. I was not surprised he was so supportive of, and defensive of the lawbreaking acts off his weirdo sidekick. Without Cummings to think stuff up he was hopeless. But quick on his feet when cornered ? Definitely, far more than Blair, Brown et al. |
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Jan 15, 2023 16:47:12 GMT
Boris, quick-witted?  lol I think you would be surprised. He is a prize prick in so many ways, I have explained a few in other posts on here However I had the misfortune to have to sit in on meetings with him when he was mayor of London. I tell you now, that bumbling buffoonery he out in at the podium was a complete piece of thespianism. I confronted him on his campaign trail over the bollocks on his bus, and while you could see the cogs whirring it took a fraction of a second for him to think of something and present it with a huge degree of utterly fake sincerity. When I took down Blind Pew Blunkett in St Stephens Entrance over his pissing about with my daughters ability to sit GCSEs he was absolutely buggered for an answer for ages, and when the select committee took down Blair over fast tracked visas with my help he was speechless and flabbergasted. Now in case you think this is some form of admiration, screw that. The blonde berk us a buffoon of the highest order, and without Cummings he was helpless hence his spirited defence of that prat’s lawbreaking, but the one thing I gave to hand him is an ability to think fast and make it sound convincing in the heat of the moment. Which makes him a dangerous opponent |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 15, 2023 22:43:00 GMT
You wouldn’t know proof if you fell arse over tit on it. I have better things to do on a Sunday afternoon rather than feeding the trolls.  |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 15, 2023 22:52:09 GMT
I think you would be surprised. He is a prize prick in so many ways, I have explained a few in other posts on here However I had the misfortune to have to sit in on meetings with him when he was mayor of London. I tell you now, that bumbling buffoonery he out in at the podium was a complete piece of thespianism. I confronted him on his campaign trail over the bollocks on his bus, and while you could see the cogs whirring it took a fraction of a second for him to think of something and present it with a huge degree of utterly fake sincerity. When I took down Blind Pew Blunkett in St Stephens Entrance over his pissing about with my daughters ability to sit GCSEs he was absolutely buggered for an answer for ages, and when the select committee took down Blair over fast tracked visas with my help he was speechless and flabbergasted. Now in case you think this is some form of admiration, screw that. The blonde berk us a buffoon of the highest order, and without Cummings he was helpless hence his spirited defence of that prat’s lawbreaking, but the one thing I gave to hand him is an ability to think fast and make it sound convincing in the heat of the moment. Which makes him a dangerous opponent Fast Tracked Visas? __"However Sir Alan Budd, chairman of the inquiry into the allegations, said that it was impossible to determine whether Blunkett had raised the case with officials as an example of problems with the immigration service, as he claims, or if he was intervening on a personal basis.
The open nature of the verdict has left many questions unanswered, and the Conservative Party is now calling for a judicial inquiry into the matter.
Budd emphasized his belief that there was no attempt "to destroy, conceal or withhold documents or information" from the investigation. |
|
|
|
Post by jonksy on Jan 15, 2023 22:53:52 GMT
You wouldn’t know proof if you fell arse over tit on it. I have better things to do on a Sunday afternoon rather than feeding the trolls. The usual badge of the trolls. |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 15, 2023 22:55:17 GMT
The usual badge of the trolls. You must have a pocket full of them then. |
|
|
|
Post by johnofgwent on Jan 15, 2023 23:13:59 GMT
I think you would be surprised. He is a prize prick in so many ways, I have explained a few in other posts on here However I had the misfortune to have to sit in on meetings with him when he was mayor of London. I tell you now, that bumbling buffoonery he out in at the podium was a complete piece of thespianism. I confronted him on his campaign trail over the bollocks on his bus, and while you could see the cogs whirring it took a fraction of a second for him to think of something and present it with a huge degree of utterly fake sincerity. When I took down Blind Pew Blunkett in St Stephens Entrance over his pissing about with my daughters ability to sit GCSEs he was absolutely buggered for an answer for ages, and when the select committee took down Blair over fast tracked visas with my help he was speechless and flabbergasted. Now in case you think this is some form of admiration, screw that. The blonde berk us a buffoon of the highest order, and without Cummings he was helpless hence his spirited defence of that prat’s lawbreaking, but the one thing I gave to hand him is an ability to think fast and make it sound convincing in the heat of the moment. Which makes him a dangerous opponent Fast Tracked Visas? __"However Sir Alan Budd, chairman of the inquiry into the allegations, said that it was impossible to determine whether Blunkett had raised the case with officials as an example of problems with the immigration service, as he claims, or if he was intervening on a personal basis.
The open nature of the verdict has left many questions unanswered, and the Conservative Party is now calling for a judicial inquiry into the matter.
Budd emphasized his belief that there was no attempt "to destroy, conceal or withhold documents or information" from the investigation.You’ve mixed the issues. My argument with Blunkett was while he was education secretary. I had the opportunity to belittle him over his decision not to override my daughters school’s decision to ban her from sitting the GCSEs she needed to further her career in case her failure impacted the league position. My argument with Blair was conducted by a parliamentary select committee. Shortly after getting into parliament he sent Stephen Byers and Patricia Hewitt to India to fill jumbo jets with wannabe software engineers. He promised them fast tracked visas on tbe basis there were no people with those skills. Working with a team including a known lobbyist a total of a thousand CVs were obtained for British passport holders in Britain with those skills seeking work. The Shadow Paymaster General Richard Ottaway took those and presented them to a select committee as proof Blair misled the house in declaring his fast tracked visa scheme was needed as no one with the requisite skills were available. Blair’s scheme was quietly dropped, but not before it had done the damage he intended |
|
|
|
Post by see2 on Jan 16, 2023 16:27:44 GMT
Fast Tracked Visas? __"However Sir Alan Budd, chairman of the inquiry into the allegations, said that it was impossible to determine whether Blunkett had raised the case with officials as an example of problems with the immigration service, as he claims, or if he was intervening on a personal basis.
The open nature of the verdict has left many questions unanswered, and the Conservative Party is now calling for a judicial inquiry into the matter.
Budd emphasized his belief that there was no attempt "to destroy, conceal or withhold documents or information" from the investigation.You’ve mixed the issues. My argument with Blunkett was while he was education secretary. I had the opportunity to belittle him over his decision not to override my daughters school’s decision to ban her from sitting the GCSEs she needed to further her career in case her failure impacted the league position. My argument with Blair was conducted by a parliamentary select committee. Shortly after getting into parliament he sent Stephen Byers and Patricia Hewitt to India to fill jumbo jets with wannabe software engineers. He promised them fast tracked visas on tbe basis there were no people with those skills. Working with a team including a known lobbyist a total of a thousand CVs were obtained for British passport holders in Britain with those skills seeking work. The Shadow Paymaster General Richard Ottaway took those and presented them to a select committee as proof Blair misled the house in declaring his fast tracked visa scheme was needed as no one with the requisite skills were available. Blair’s scheme was quietly dropped, but not before it had done the damage he intended Genuine congratulation's, well done. |
|
